Inhibitor studies of purified haemopoietic (myeloid) cell esterases: Evidence for the existence of distinct enzyme species

Abstract Human myeloid cells synthesize and express two major species of esterase, defined by isoelectric focusing (IEF). The first of these (MonEst) is specifically associated with haemopoietic cells of monocytic lineage, whereas the other species (ComEst) is common to all myeloid cells (granulocytes and monocytes) irrespective of lineage affiliation. Having recently purified these two species of human myeloid cell esterase, this present study extensively investigated the effects of 17 different inhibitors on their ability to hydrolyse the synthetic substrate alpha-naphthyl acetate (αNA). Significant inhibition of both ComEst and MonEst was exerted by 1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and 1.0 mM diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), but the patterns of inhibition for the two esterase species with the remaining compounds studied differed considerably; for example, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), 5.0 × 10 −3 M dichloroisocoumarin (DCIC) and 0.1 mM N- tosyl - l - phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) all inhibited MonEst but not ComEst. Mechanisms of inhibition were also examined and these studies established that SDS, PMSF, DCIC and TPCK irreversibly inactivated MonEst whilst the inhibition of ComEst by SDS was reversible. Analysis of inhibition kinetics further showed that (a) the reversible inhibition of both ComEst and MonEst by sodium fluoride (NaF) was noncompetitive (with K i , values of 1.28 and 0.01 mM, respectively, indicating a marked difference in sensitivity); (b) the inhibition of MonEst by PMSF was of ‘mixed’ noncompetitive-competitive type; and (c) that DEPC exerted noncompetitive inhibition with similar K i values (0.05 mM) for both esterase species. These observations unequivocably demonstrate that ComEst and MonEst are unrelated enzyme species, with a common ability to hydrolyse αNA, and that these esterases show marked differences with respect to their active sites as adjudged by inhibitor sensitivities. These observations are particularly relevant to the histochemical analysis of these enzymes and to the elucidation of their in vivo functions.