A Challenging Criterion for Premature Ejaculationfrom a Wider Perspective: Evaluation withIntravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)

In today’s world of innovation and technology, every effort gets its correspondence in terms of reaching the best way of practice. Men’s healthcare is also receiving its share from the ongoing prospective studies of diagnosis and treatment. When we consider the sexual life cycle, premature ejaculation has been a complicating issue for men ever after. It has been one of the most challenging problems in urology for ages. However, premature ejaculation, itself, has been a somehow subjectively measured complaint and a quite difficult issue to diagnose. Although men attend to urology clinic themselves when they suffer from premature ejaculation, it also bothers their female partners when the diagnosis and treatment were both taken into consideration. Since the history taking during urologic examination only depends on the male patient and the diagnosis is established according to his complaints, the situation can be IELT is a relatively simple and easy-to-understand method of evaluation of patients’ response to treatment of premature ejaculation. Partners’ attendance to measurement of IELT is a challenging approach to evaluate these patients’ problems. We aimed to re-assess the usability of this way of measurement of response to treatment of premature ejaculation.