New Horizons in Cardioprotection Recommendations From the 2010 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop

Coronary heart disease is the largest major killer of American men and women and accounted for 1 of every 6 deaths in the United States in 2007.1 The annual incidence of myocardial infarction in the United States is estimated to be 935 000, with 610 000 new cases and 325 000 recurrent attacks. Survivors have a much higher chance of suffering from congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Prognosis after an acute myocardial ischemic injury is primarily dependent on the amount of myocardium that undergoes irreversible injury.2–4 Large transmural infarcts yield a higher probability of cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias, adverse remodeling, and development of late chronic heart failure. Although it has been known since the early 1970s that the size of a myocardial infarction can be modified by various therapeutic interventions,5 early coronary artery reperfusion by fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention, including balloon angioplasty with or without stenting, remains the only established intervention capable of consistently reducing infarct size in humans. Although reperfusion has led to significant advances in patient care and reduction in hospital mortality, delays in seeking medical attention and inherent limitations in initiating fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention dictate that additional substantive improvements in morbidity and mortality can be achieved only with the development of new adjunctive therapies coupled with reperfusion. In addition, reperfusion therapy itself may induce reperfusion injury, a phenomenon that may encompass stunned myocardium, no-reflow phenomenon, and lethal myocardial cell death. If this injury could be prevented or minimized by administration of adjunctive therapy, then the net benefit of reperfusion could be enhanced. The problem of acute ischemic injury and myocardial infarction is not limited to patients with acute coronary artery syndrome. It remains a major problem in cardiac surgery as well. It is well documented that the incidence of myocardial necrosis after surgery, as determined by creatine kinase MB enzyme release and troponin levels, ranges somewhere between 40% and 60%, and, depending on its clinical definition, the incidence of myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery may be as high as 19%. The intermediate and long-term implications are considerable. In a recent retrospective analysis of 18 908 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and in whom long-term follow-up was available, it was shown that myocardial enzyme elevation within the first 24 hours of surgery was associated with increasing mortality over the course of months to years. This study confirms earlier reports that even small enzyme elevations after surgery are associated with worse long-term outcomes.4