Meeting the National Mesothelioma Audit standards in clinical practice: How achievable is it?
2019
Introduction: The National Mesothelioma Audit Report 2018 highlighted variability in care of patients diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma (Royal College of Physicians, 2018; 9-11). We reviewed our practice during 2014-2018. Methods: Data for mesothelioma diagnoses in 2014-18 were obtained from the Somerset Cancer Registry and electronic patient records. Results: 59 patient notes were reviewed; 84.7% were male. Mean age was 75 years (range 50-90). Performance status (PS) was recorded in 55 (93.2%). 44 (74.6%) patients had video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). 56 (94.9%) had pathological confirmation of mesothelioma; with pathological subtype in 44 (74.6%). 3 patients had no pathological confirmation. 2 were not investigated further due to PS 3; both died within 50 days of diagnosis. 1 had an inconclusive biopsy and the MDT felt histology would not change management. 30 (50.8%) received anti-cancer treatment: 20 (33.9%) chemotherapy, 14 (23.7%) radiotherapy (4 patients both). 17 of 37 patients with PS 0-1 received chemotherapy (45.9%). Conclusion: Audit standards were exceeded in recording PS and obtaining pathological diagnosis, but not in recording pathological subtype (Table 1). Chemotherapy rate was lower than expected despite all PS 0-1 patients being referred to oncology. This could be due to rapidly declining PS or patient choice. The findings highlight the aggressive nature of the disease and impact on treatment options.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI