The laboratory aspects of proteinuria
2016
Introduction. The existence of proteinuria may be overlooked by applying the
test strips. The aim of this study has been to determine the discrepancy
between the findings of proteinuria detected by test strips when compared to
the results of its testing with the sulfosalicylic acid. Material and
Methods. The study sample consisted of 1106 subjects, who were divided into
the proteinuria positive (test strips showed the presence of isolated
proteinuria), and proteinuria negative group (microscopic examination
revealed the presence of >10 fresh red blood cells/μL, and/or >1 dysmorphic
erythrocyte/μL, and/or >10 leukocytes/μL, and/or> 1 cylinder, and/or >1
nonsquamous epithelial cells/μL, and/or >100 bacteria/μL). Both groups had
the urine tested with sulfosalicylic acid. The chemical and microscopic
examination of the urine was done by the analyzer LabUMat-UriSed. Results.
Proteinuria was confirmed with the sulfosalicylic acid test in 96.5% of
subjects from group 1 and in 85.3% of subjects from group 2. Among the
patients with the negative finding of proteinuria on the test strip and with
the positive sulfosalicylic acid test there was a significantly higher number
of those with pathological findings of erythrocytes, leukocytes, bacteria and
cylinders in the urine when compared to those of the same group with negative
sulfosalicylic acid test. Conclusion. Sulfosalicylic acid test should be
performed in cases of pathological microscopic findings in the urine in case
of the presence of >10 fresh erythrocytes/μL and/or >1 dysmorphic
erythrocyte/μL and/or >10 leukocytes/μL and/or >1 cylinder (except hyaline)
and/or >1 nonsquamous epithelial cells/μL and/or >100 bacteria/μL even if the
test strip examination is negative for proteinuria.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI