Evaluation of the activity of ertapenem against gonococcal isolates exhibiting a range of susceptibilities to cefixime

Results: The isolates comprised 42 different molecular types as defined by NG-MAST. The susceptibility of the clinical isolates to ertapenem was similar to that of cefixime, with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of R ¼ 0.89. The MIC90 and MIC50 values of ertapenem were 0.25 and 0.12 mg/L, respectively, while those of cefixime were 0.12 and 0.06 mg/L, respectively. However, these isolates were more susceptible to ceftriaxone than ertapenem, with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of R ¼ 0.65 and ceftriaxone MIC90 and MIC50 values of 0.03 and 0.016 mg/L, respectively. The isolates that were least susceptible to ertapenem were all non-producers of penicillinase. However, one isolate that was highly resistant to cefixime and ceftriaxone was more susceptible to ertapenem than either cefixime or ceftriaxone. Conclusions: This study has shown that ertapenem is not a suitable alternative for first-line treatment for gonorrhoea but that it may be useful for the treatment of highly resistant infections.