A contrast analysis of Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic surgery comparative for the treatment of cervical stump cancer

Objective To compare the clinical data of Da Vinci robotic and laparoscpic surgical treatment of cervical stump cancer, discuss the Da Vinci robotic safety and advantage. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 9 cases of cervical stump cancer patients in hospital(clinical stage for Ⅰb1-Ⅱa2) who undergoing radical hysterectomy in Jilin Province Tumor Hospital from Oct. 2014 to Oct. 2016, 4 cases of cervical stump cancer undergoing robot radical hysterectomy(robot group)and 5 cases of cervical stump cancer undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy(traditional laparoscopic group). Results The operation time were(151.3 ± 10.4)min and(150.3 ± 13.2)min, the operation blood loss were(108.5 ± 26.5)ml and(232.5 ± 18.5)ml, the activity time after surgery were(1.5 ± 0.8)d and (2.3 ± 0.5)d, postoperative urinary tube pull out time were(8.5 ± 0.5)d and(14.6 ± 1.3)d, postoperative pain VAS score were(4.8 ± 0.9)and (6.4 ± 1.4), the exhaust time after surgery were(1.4 ± 0.6)d and(2.6 ± 0.7)d, the the length of time after the surgery(10.4 ± 1.7)d and(15.2 ± 2.1)d in robot group and traditional laparoscopic. The operation time there was no statistically significant (P> 0.05). All the rest of the project the differenct was statistically significant (P< 0.05). Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for cervical stump cancer is safe and feasible. Key words: Cervical stump cancer; Da Vinci robotic; Laparoscopy