Comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal upper calyceal stones with two approaches

Objective To investigate and compare the effects of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal upper calyceal stones with approaches through upper edge of the 1 lth rib and lower edge of the 11th fib.Methods Two hundred and sixteen cases of kidney stones in our hospital from July 2008 to July 2010 were reviewed.Of which 66 patients were renal calyceal stones.Thirty-two patients underwent the approach through upper edge of the 11th rib (group A),with 15 males and 17 females,with a mean age of 42 years.Ten cases with stone were located on the left side,right 21 cases,and bilateral 1 case,with calculi average maximum diameter of 1.9 cm.Thirty-four cases underwent the approach through lower edge of the 11th path (B group),with 14 males and 20 females,with a mean age of 44 years.Thirteen cases with stone were located on the left side,right 21 cases,with calculi average maximum diameter of 1.7 cm.The two groups underwent minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy holmium laser lithotripsy lithotomy.The average puncture time,one-time success rate of puncture and disposable stone-free rate were compared.Results Puncture time of group A was 3.0-14.0 min,with an average of 5.8 min,and group B was 3.0-17.0 min with an average of 6.4 min.The disposable puncture success rate of the two groups was 100％.Disposable stone-free rate was 100％ in group A (32/32),and 88％ in group B (30/34) (P ＜ 0.05).There were no pneumothorax,hemothorax,abdominal viscera injury in two groups.Conclusions The minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy through the approach of upper edge of the llth fib was better than through the approach of conventional lower edge of 11 subcostal margin,with shorter percutaneous renal access distance,and higher stone-free rate. Key words: Nephrostomy, percutaneous;  Renal upper calyceal stones;  11 rib