POS1122 PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF THE PROTECT CLINICAL TRIAL: PEGLOTICASE EFFICACY AND SAFETY IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

Background: The prevalence of gout is high in kidney transplant (KT) recipients (up to 13%), largely because of decreased kidney function and calcineurin inhibitor use.1 Residual chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to decreased urate lowering therapy clearance and drug interactions make managing gout in KT recipients challenging. Studies show that successful treatment with pegloticase, a pegylated uricase, leads to marked reductions in serum uric acid (sUA)2 and a subsequent decrease in overall urate load and tophi burden.3 However, pegloticase use in solid organ transplant recipients has not been systematically studied or well-characterized in the literature.4,5 Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of pegloticase in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout. Methods: This ongoing multicenter, open-label, efficacy and safety study of pegloticase in KT recipients (NCT04087720) included patients with uncontrolled gout sUA ≥7 mg/dL, urate lowering therapy [ULT] contraindication/inefficacy, and with either visible tophi, chronic gouty arthritis, or ≥2 flares in past year, who were KT recipients (KT >1 year prior), had a functioning graft (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥15 ml/min/1.73m2), and were on a stable immunosuppressant regimen. Pegloticase (8 mg infusion) was administered biweekly for 24 weeks (12 infusions) followed by a safety visit 30 days after the last infusion and 3-month post-treatment follow up visit. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients who were serum uric acid responders during Month 6 (sUA Results: Preliminary findings of this study included 15 patients (12 male, 53.5±11.0 years of age) with uncontrolled gout (6.2±6.0 years since diagnosis) who had received a donor kidney 15.1±6.6 years earlier. At the time of analysis, 5 patients had completed the 24-week treatment period and 8 remained on therapy (last visit sUA 1 patient included gout flare, pyrexia, arthralgia, and nasal congestion. No anaphylaxis or infusion reactions occurred. Conclusion: Initial findings suggest that pegloticase therapy is effective at reducing sUA in most KT recipients while preserving renal function. Results suggest that in the setting of profound urate lowering with pegloticase in KT patients, eGFR remains stable and patients experience clinically beneficial reductions in pain and disability with an absence of unexpected safety findings. References: [1]Clive DM. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;May11(5):974-9. [2]Sundy JS, et al. JAMA 2011;306:711-720. [3]Mandell BF, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2018;20:286. [4]Freyne B. Transplant Proc 2018;50:4099-101. [5]Hershfield MS, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R63. Disclosure of Interests: Abdul Abdellatif Speakers bureau: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Lin Zhao Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Paul M. Peloso Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Katya Cherny Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Brad Marder Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, John Scandling Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics plc, Kenneth Saag Consultant of: Arthrosi, Atom Bioscience, Horizon, LG Pharma, Mallinkrodt, SOBI, Takeda, Grant/research support from: Horizon, SOBI, Shanton.