HERMeS Thruster Magnetic Field Topology Optimization Study: Performance, Stability, and Wear Results

NASA's Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) 12.5kW Technology Demonstration Unit-1 (TDU-1) has been the subject of extensive technology maturation in preparation for flight system development. The TDU-1 thruster implements a magnetically shielded field topology and has demonstrated the elimination of the discharge channel erosion as a life limiting mechanism. Extensive wear testing the TDU Hall thrusters has identified the thruster front pole covers as the next life limiting component. This effort aims to explore and investigate alternate magnetic field topologies to assess whether reductions in the front pole cover erosion can be attained while still maintaining very low erosion rates on the discharge channel walls. Four candidate magnetic field topologies that reduce the effectiveness of the shielding along the discharge channel walls with the intent to also reduce the erosion rates along the front pole covers were designed. Three of the four candidate magnetic field topologies (B1, B2, and B4) have been manufactured and were subjected to an extensive test campaign that includes laser induced fluorescence (LIF), performance, stability, wear, plume, and thermal characterization. In Phase I, LIF measurements along the discharge chamber centerline found that upstream retraction of the thruster's peak magnetic field does result in an upstream shift of the acceleration zone but the magnitude of the shift does not correspond one-to-one to the shift in the location of the peak radial magnetic field magnitude. Phase II test segment results found at a normalized thruster magnetic field setting of 1, the thruster performance was very similar for all configurations. Discharge current waveforms ripple data indicated that configurations Bo, B1, and B2 has similar oscillatory profiles with the B2 configuration transitioning to higher oscillatory mode at 400V instead of the 450V observed for configurations B0 and B1. Configuration B4 ripple data indicates that the thruster was operating in a very oscillatory mode above 350V. Inner front pole cover erosion rates for configuration B1 were approximately 65% relative to B0 and the erosion rates for configuration B2 were 40% relative to B0. Analysis of the performance, stability, and wear test results of configurations B0, B1, B2, and B4 indicates that configuration B2 may present an alternative option for B0 because it mostly maintained the same performance and stability as configuration B0 but with 40% of the inner front pole cover erosion rate.