Development of atmospheric tracer methods to measure methane emissions from natural gas facilities and urban areas.

Environ. Sci. Techno/. 1995, 29, 1468-1 479 Introduction Tracer -Methods To Measure Downloaded by UNIV OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE on August 26, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1995 | doi: 10.1021/es00006a007 Gas Faciliies and U h n Areas BRIAN K. LAMB,*,’ J. BARRY MCMANUS,* JOANNE H. SHORTER,* CHARLES E . KOLB,* BYARD MOSHER,$ R O B E R T C . HARRISS,§ EUGENE ALLWINE,’ DENISE BLAHA,$ T O U C H E H O W A R D , ” A L E X GUENTHER,l ROBERT A. LOTT,A ROBERT SIVERSON,’ HAL WESTBERG,’ AND PAT ZIMMERMAN- Laboratory for Atmospheric Research, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2910, Center for Chemical and Environmental Physics, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, Indaco Air Quality Services, Inc., Pullman, Washington 99163, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80303, and Gas Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois 60631 -3562 A new, integrated methodologyto locate and measure methane emissions from natural gas systems has been developed. Atmospheric methane sources are identified by elevated ambient CH4 concentrations measured with a mobile laser-based methane analyzer. The total methane emission rate from a source is obtained by simulating the source with a sulfur hexafluoride (SFS) tracer gas release and by measuring methane and tracer concentrations along downwind sampling paths using mobile, real-time analyzers. Combustion sources of methane are dis- tinguished from noncombustion sources by concur- rent ambient carbon dioxide measurements. Three variations on the tracer ratio method are described for application to (1) small underground vaults, (2) above- ground natural gas facilities, and (3) diffuse methane emissions from an entire town. Results from controlled releases and from replicate tests demonstrate thatthe tracer ratio approach can yield total emission rates to within approximately &15%. The estimated accuracy of emission estimates for urban areas with a variety of diffuse emissions is &50%. Methane (CH4) has been a contributor to the increasing burden of greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere for more than a century (1). Faced with significant risks identified in scenarios of increasing greenhouse gas con- centrations, many countries are developing plans to reduce emissions. However, uncertainties in specific source emission rates for CH4 and other non-COz greenhouse gases currently limit the quantitative risk-benefit analysis needed to answer key policy questions related to the socioeconomic impacts of large-scale mitigation actions (2, 3 ) . Initial attempts to estimate CH4 losses to the atmosphere from natural gas production and use assumed that emis- sions could be approximated by industry reports of “unac- counted for” gas (e.g., ref 4). Unaccounted for gas, defined as the difference between the amount of natural gas metered into a system and the amount of gas metered out of a system, does not account for gas losses from wells to the processing plant, gas used as fuel in facilities, theft of gas, meter inaccuracies, and differences in accounting procedures between companies (4,5). Thus, the unaccounted for gas estimates cannot unambiguously be considered an upper or lower bound on emissions (5). Extrapolation of engi- neering estimates or data obtained from component by component sniffing methods also leads to large uncertain- ties in estimated emissions. In the United Kingdom, the British Gas Company estimates CH4 emissions from gas distribution system components to be less than 1% of throughput, while others estimate losses as high as 11% of gas throughput (6). A recent estimate of CH4 leakage from the natural gas system in the former Soviet Union, which was characterized as “tentative and highly conditional” suggested a range of total losses from 3.3% to 7% of gas production ( 7 ) . The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Gas Research Institute (GRI) have recently sponsored an integrated field measurement and analysis program to better define methane emissions from the U.S. natural gas system. Drawing on initial measurements using some of the techniques reported here as weil as engineering estimates, GRI has developed a preliminary estimate of methane emissions from the gas industry that equals approximately 1.5 i 0.5% of annual throughput (8). In the case of CH4 emissions due to the use of natural gas, there is an added motivation for correctly prescribing the methane source strength. Since natural gas typically produces 32-45% less COz per unit of thermal output compared to coal and 30% less compared to fuel oil, switching from coal and fuel oil to natural gas has the potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and reduce global warming (5). However, CH4 is a more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 on a molecule for molecule basis (9- 1 I). As a result, increasing the usage of natural gas may * To whom correspondence should be addressed: e-mail address: blamb@wsu.edu. + Washington State University. Aerodyne Research, Inc. 5 University of New Hampshire. I’ Indaco Air Quality Services, Inc. National Center for Atmospheric Research. A Gas Research Institute. 1468 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 29, NO. 6, 1995 0013-936)(/95/0929-1468$09.00/0 @ 1995 American Chemical Society