Application of CGF in repair of bone defects around dental implants and its clinical significance

Objective To investigate the application of CGF in the repair of bone defects around dental implants and its clinical significance. Methods A total of 68 patients with bone defects around the dental implants treated at our hospital between January, 2017 and December, 2018 were enrolled. The random number table was used to divided them into a control group (n=34) and an observation group (n=34). The control group was treated with conventional bone implant repair method, and the observation group applied CGF in the treatment of bone defect around the dental implant. After the operation, the two components were compared. The treatment results of the two groups were evaluated and compared. The healing degree in both groups, the pain, and the presence or absence of infection were compared. Results 10 days after the operation, the normal level of mask, mucosal color point bleeding, and the pale or even erosive mucous were (110.2±2.4), (95.4±1.5), and (17.8±2.5) in the observation group, which were better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). 10 days after the surgery, the painless rate and no infection rate were higher in the observation group than in the control group (79.41% vs. 38.23% and 79.41% vs. 67.64%, both P<0.05). Conclusion Application of CGF in the repair of bone defects around dental implants not only can reduce the patients’ infection rate, but also can shorten the treatment time, and is effective, so it is worthy of popularization and application. Key words: CGF; Bone defect around dental implants; Defect repair; Clinical effect