Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed to treat early colorectal cancer. However, additional surgery for pathological T1 colorectal cancer (pT1CRC) after ER is controversial because of the imprecise prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Recently, several patients of pT1CRC with lymphoid follicular replacement (LFR) without LNM have been reported. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and risk of LNM in patients with pT1CRC with LFR.
We investigated the efficacy and safety of radial incision and cutting as a novel dilation method for strictures just before endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with metachronous esophageal cancer localized on the distal side of strictures and determined the optimal dilation method. Consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas localized on the distal side of severe strictures were investigated retrospectively and assigned to a radial incision and cutting (19 patients; 23 lesions) or an endoscopic balloon dilation (20 patients; 20 lesions) group. We evaluated the passage success rates of cap-wearing endoscopes with diameters ≥8.9 mm, the procedural success, en bloc resection, complete resection, major adverse event rates, and total procedure times. Compared to the endoscopic balloon dilation group, the passage success rate of a conventional endoscope with a transparent cap (87% vs. 50%) and procedural success rate (96% vs. 63%) were significantly higher in the radial incision and cutting group. The mean procedure time of 'dilation and ESD' was significantly shorter in the radial incision and cutting group than in the endoscopic balloon dilation group. Neither group experienced any serious adverse events. Radial incision and cutting followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection was effective and safe in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas localized on the distal side of severe benign esophageal strictures. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a cap-wearing endoscope was possible with radial incision and cutting, and the procedure time was shorter than that for endoscopic balloon dilation.
: Esophageal strictures are generally classified into malignant due to advanced cancer and benign strictures after treatment for esophageal cancer. Several endoscopic procedures including ablation technique and stent placement, are used for patients with malignant esophageal strictures in our oncology practice. And, there is a potential for the development of severe esophageal stricture after curative treatment including esophagectomy, radiotherapy and endoscopic resection (ER), if the esophageal cancer can be cured. The aim of this narrative review article is to introduce landmark studies about endoscopic treatment or prevention esophageal stricture in oncology and to discuss about the unsolved issue or future direction. The primary endoscopic procedure for mechanically improving benign esophageal strictures is endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), and incision treatment or stent placement is applied for refractory cases. Regarding ER for esophageal cancer, post-intervention stricture rates are approximately 15% and the risk of stricture is associated with the lesion’s size. Therefore, prophylactic treatments mainly steroid administration to prevent stricture after ER of early esophageal cancer was introduced and showed the favorable clinical outcome. Endoscopic intervention is effective and safety treatment to surgical treatment for patients with malignant and benign esophageal strictures. However, several unresolved issues remain in the endoscopic management of esophageal stricture and further development is necessary in our oncological practice.
Few reports have detailed improvements in the quality of colonoscopies with continuous training post-fellowship completion. We examined the changes in colonoscopy performance among trainees during our advanced endoscopy training program.
Abstract Background and study aims: Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is indicated for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and has shown favorable short-term outcomes. However, re-stricture after RIC may occur in the long term, and RIC is performed repeatedly in such cases, but the efficacy and safety of repeated RIC are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the repeated RIC for refractory benign esophageal strictures after surgical and non-surgical treatment. Patients and methods: Between April 2008 and September 2019, we enrolled patients who were treated with the first RIC for benign esophageal strictures. The RIC was indicated for the refractory stricture and repeatedly performed for re-refractory esophageal stricture after RIC. We retrospectively evaluated the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate, and adverse events (AEs) in the first RIC and repeated RICs. Results: Forty-six patients (39 men, 7 women; median age, 71 years, range 49–85) were included. RIC was performed once in 24 patients (non-repeated RIC group) and two or more times in 22 patients (repeated RIC group). In all patients, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first RIC were 42.3 %. In the repeated RIC group, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first and repeated RICs were 18.2 % vs 18.2 %, respectively. No AEs were noted. Conclusions: Repeated RIC could be effective in the short-term and safe even for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture after the first RIC. However, it cannot be considered curative treatment for refractory stricture because of poor long-term results.
Background and study aims Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a highly technical procedure mainly due to the distinctive shape of the stomach and diverse locations of lesions. We developed a new gastric ESD training model (G-Master) that could accurately recreate the location of the stomach and assessed the reproducibility of located lesions in the model. Methods The model comprises a simulated mucous membrane sheet made of konjac flour and a setting frame, which can simulate 11 locations of the stomach. We assessed the reproducibility of each location in the model by assessing the procedure speed and using a questionnaire that was distributed among experts. In the questionnaire, each location was scored on a six-point scale for similarity of locations. Results The mean score for all locations was high with > 4 points. Regarding locations, lower anterior and posterior walls had medium scores with 3 to 4 points. The procedure speed was slower in the greater curvature of the upper and middle gastric portions, where ESD is considered more difficult than the overall procedure speed. Conclusions The new gastric ESD training model appears to be highly reproducible for each gastric location and its application for training in assuming actual gastric ESD locations.
Aims Benign esophageal strictures after any treatment of esophageal cancer are often refractory to conventional dilation. Radial incision and cutting (RIC) method is indicated for refractory cases and showed the favorable outcome in the short term. However, some cases develop re-stricture in the long term and RIC is tried to perform repeatedly for such cases. As its efficacy and safety have not been reported yet, we aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of second RIC.
