The analysis of quantitative hemodynamics and luminal pressure may add valuable information to aid treatment strategies and prognosis for aortic dissections. This work directly compared in vitro 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), catheter-based pressure measurements, and computational fluid dynamics that integrated fluid-structure interaction (CFD FSI). Experimental data was acquired with a compliant 3D-printed model of a type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) that was embedded into a physiologically tuned flow circuit. In vitro flow and pressure information were used to tune the CFD FSI Windkessel boundary conditions. Results showed very good overall agreement of complex flow patterns, true to false lumen flow splits, and pressure distribution. This work demonstrates feasibility of a tunable experimental setup that integrates a patient-specific compliant model and provides a test bed for exploring critical imaging and modeling parameters that ultimately may improve the prognosis for patients with aortic dissections.
The analysis of quantitative hemodynamics and luminal pressure may add valuable information to aid treatment strategies and prognosis for aortic dissections. This work directly compared in vitro 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), catheter-based pressure measurements, and computational fluid dynamics that integrated fluid-structure interaction (CFD FSI). Experimental data was acquired with a compliant 3D-printed model of a type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) that was embedded into a physiologically tuned flow circuit. In vitro flow and pressure information were used to tune the CFD FSI Windkessel boundary conditions. Results showed very good overall agreement of complex flow patterns, true to false lumen flow splits, and pressure distribution. This work demonstrates feasibility of a tunable experimental setup that integrates a patient-specific compliant model and provides a test bed for exploring critical imaging and modeling parameters that ultimately may improve the prognosis for patients with aortic dissections.
Geometric distortions along the phase encoding direction caused by off-resonant spins are a major issue in EPI based functional and diffusion imaging. The widely used blip up/down approach estimates the underlying distortion field from a pair of images with inverted phase encoding direction. Typically, iterative methods are used to find a solution to the ill-posed problem of finding the displacement field that maps up/down acquisitions onto each other. Here, we explore the use of a deep convolutional network to estimate the displacement map from a pair of input images.We trained a deep convolutional U-net architecture that was previously used to estimate optic flow between moving images to learn to predict the distortion map from an input pair of distorted EPI acquisitions. During the training step, the network minimizes a loss function (similarity metric) that is calculated from corrected input image pairs. This approach does not require the explicit knowledge of the ground truth distortion map, which is difficult to get for real life data.We used data from a total of Ntrain = 22 healthy subjects to train our network. A separate dataset of Ntest = 12 patients including some with abnormal findings and unseen acquisition modes, e.g. LR-encoding, coronal orientation) was reserved for testing and evaluation purposes. We compared our results to FSL's topup function with default parameters that served as the gold standard. We found that our approach results in a correction accuracy that is virtually identical to the optimum found by an iterative search, but with reduced computational time.By using a deep convolutional network, we can reduce the processing time to a few seconds per volume, which is significantly faster than iterative approaches like FSL's topup which takes around 10min on the same machine (but using only 1 CPU). This facilitates the use of a blip up/down scheme for all diffusion-weighted acquisitions and potential real-time EPI distortion correction without sacrificing accuracy.
Discuss foundational concepts for artificial intelligence (AI) and review recent literature on its application to aortic disease.Machine learning (ML) techniques are rapidly evolving for the evaluation of aortic disease - broadly categorized as algorithms for aortic segmentation, detection of pathology, and risk stratification. Advances in deep learning, particularly U-Net architectures, have revolutionized segmentation of the aorta and show potential for monitoring the size of aortic aneurysm and characterizing aortic dissection. These algorithms also facilitate application of more complex technologies including analysis of flow dynamics with 4D Flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational simulation of fluid dynamics for aortic coarctation. In addition, AI algorithms have been proposed to assist in 'opportunistic' screening from routine imaging exams, including automated aortic calcification score, which has emerged as a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Finally, several ML algorithms are being explored for risk stratification of patients with aortic aneurysm and dissection, in addition to prediction of postprocedural complications.Multiple ML techniques have potential for characterization and risk prediction of aortic aneurysm, dissection, coarctation, and atherosclerotic disease on computed tomography and MRI. This nascent field shows considerable promise with many applications in development and in early preclinical evaluation.
