Abstract Introduction: Mildly injured and “worried well” patients can have profound effects on the management of a mass-casualty incident. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and lessons learned from an event that occurred on 28 August 2005 near the central bus station in Beer-Sheva, Israel. The unique profile of injuries allows for the examination of the medical and operational aspects of the management of mild casualties. Methods: Data were collected during and after the event, using patient records and formal debriefings.They were processed focusing on the characteristics of patient complaints, medical response, and the dynamics of admission. Results: A total of 64 patients presented to the local emergency department, including two critical casualties. The remaining 62 patients were mildly injured or suffered from stress. Patient presentation to the emergency department was bi-phasic; during the first two hours following the attack (i.e., early phase), the rate of arrival was high (one patient every three minutes), and anxiety was the most frequent chief complaint.During the second phase, the rate of arrival was lower (one patient every 27 minutes), and the typical chief complaint was somatic. Additionally, tinnitus and complaints related to minor trauma also were recorded frequently. Psychiatric consultation was obtained for 58 (91%) of the patients. Social services were involved in the care of 47 of the patients (73%).Otolaryngology and surgery consultations were obtained for 45% and 44%, respectively. The need for some medical specialties (e.g., surgery and orthopedics) mainly was during the first phase, whereas others, mainly psychiatry and otolaryngology, were needed during both phases. Only 13 patients (20%) needed a consultation from internal medicine. Conclusions: Following a terrorist attack, a large number of mildly injured victims and those experiencing stress are to be expected, without a direct relation to the effectiveness of the attack. Mildly injured patients tend to appear in two phases. In the first phase, the rate of admission is expected to be higher. Due to the high incidence of anxiety and other stress-related phenomena, many mildly injured patients will require psychiatric evaluation. In the case of a bombing attack, many of the victims must be evaluated by an otolaryngologist.
Introduction: The Emergency Department (ED) is the hospital’s main gateway, as well as the initial site for diagnosis and emergency medical care. In recent years, ED overcrowding is worsening in Israel and world-wide. Overcrowding has been shown to adversely affect patient service and care, fostering patient and caregiver dissatisfaction, as well as lowering quality of care and even increasing mortality. A main driver of ED overcrowding is ED patient boarding due to limited inpatient bed availability in conjunction with hospital policy. Measuring median length of ED stay (LOS) for admitted vs. discharged patients can serve as a simple indicator for the severity of the access block over time and between facilities. Method: ED operational data from the computerized system of four hospitals in Israel were collected over a year and analyzed. In parallel data was collected regarding hospital capacity and ED volumes. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: The Mean ED LOS was significantly higher for ED patients needing admission in all hospitals. Mean ED LOS for admitted vs. discharged patients was 227 min vs.431 in hospital A, 215 min vs. 222 in hospital B, 198 min vs. 440 in hospital C and 167 min vs. 190 in hospital D. The discrepancy in LOS for admitted patients was not related to the total hospital bed capacity or the hospital ED patient volume. Conclusion: ED boarding is a major challenge for ED's and hospitals worldwide and a significant contributor to ED overcrowding. A tool to assess boarding is proposed. The tool calculates the ratio of median ED LOS between patients admitted to the hospital and those discharged. Slightly higher LOS among those admitted is to be expected, considering the fact that they usually present with more complex medical problems. In this study the LOS ratios were 1.03, 1.12, 1.90 and 2.22.
Terrorist attacks have occurred in Tel-Aviv that have caused mass-casualties. The objective of this study was to draw lessons from the medical response to an event that occurred on 19 January 2006, near the central bus station, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The lessons pertain to the management of primary triage, evacuation priorities, and rapid primary distribution between adjacent hospitals and the operational mode of the participating hospitals during the event.Data were collected in formal debriefings both during and after the event. Data were analyzed to learn about medical response components, interactions, and main outcomes. The event is described according to Disastrous Incidents Systematic AnalysiS Through-Components, Interactions and Results (DISAST-CIR) methodology.A total of 38 wounded were evacuated from the scene, including one severely injured, two moderately injured, and 35 mildly injured. The severe casualty was the first to be evacuated 14 minutes after the explosion. All of the casualties were evacuated from the scene within 29 minutes. Patients were distributed between three adjacent hospitals including one non-Level-1 Trauma Center that received mild casualties. Twenty were evacuated to the nearby, Level-1 Sourasky Medical Center, including the only severely injured patient. Nine mildly injured patients were evacuated to the Sheba Medical Center and nine to Wolfson Hospital, a non-Level-1 Trauma Center hospital. All the receiving hospitals were operated according to the mass-casualty incident doctrine.When a mass-casualty incident occurs in the vicinity of more than one hospital, primary triage, evacuation priority decision-making, and rapid distribution of casualties between all of the adjacent hospitals enables efficient and effective containment of the event.
The widespread utilization of social media in recent terror attacks in major European cities should raise a "red flag" for the emergency medical response teams. The question arises as to the impact of social media during terror events on the healthcare system. Information was published well before any emergency authority received a distress call or was requested to respond. Photos published at early stages of the attacks, through social media were uncensored, presenting identifiable pictures of victims. Technological advancements of recent years decrease and remove barriers that enable the public to use them as they see fit. These attacks raise ethical considerations for the patients and their rights as they were outsourced from the medical community, into the hands of the public. The healthcare system should leverage social media and its advantages in designing response to terror, but this requires a re-evaluation and introspection into the current emergency response models.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) among many medical professions is growing. Many health care systems have formed control mechanisms to ensure proper utilization of MRI. This western world trend is also valid in the Israeli Air Force (IAF). At the time of the study, two methods existed for consideration of MR requests in the IAF: (1) consideration by a primary reviewer, no clinical guidelines (applied to all MR examination requests, knee MR excluded). (2) Consideration by a primary reviewer according to basic clinical guidelines established by the Israeli Defense Forces medical section and by communication with an orthopedic specialist (applied to knee MR requests). Both methods did not include consultation with established criteria (such as American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria).To evaluate the appropriateness of the current regulatory methods of MRI utilization in the IAF by comparing approval/rejection decisions to established ACR criteria.The study is a retrospective analysis of written records of air force personnel, for whom MRI was requested by a specialist. We gathered information regarding the clinical problem and the final decision concerning approval or rejection of the MRI request. We then consulted with the ACR appropriateness criteria. In case a matching ACR clinical variant was found, an appropriateness value was assigned to the request. Otherwise, the request was noted as "ACR irrelevant". We predetermined to label all studies with an ACR value of 1 to 3 as inappropriate, 4 to 6 as "gray zone," and 7 to 9 as appropriate. We then compared the ACR-based decision to the original outcome of the request.The overall approval rate for MRI requests evaluated by a primary reviewer only was 96%. The overall approval rate for MRI requests evaluated by a primary reviewer, basic clinical guidelines, and specialist consultation was 51%. Among the four most prevalent MR requests types (brain, knee, spine, and shoulder), requests in the 7 to 9 scale (appropriate requests) accounted for 52%. Regarding appropriate requests, there was a 100% approval rate by a primary reviewer only compared with 17% for requests considered by a primary reviewer, basic guidelines, and specialist consultation (83% of appropriate requests were rejected by this method). Requests in the 1 to 3 scale (inappropriate requests) accounted for 3% of all requests. In this group, there was a 100% approval rate by both methods of consideration. Requests in the 4 to 6 scale (gray zone requests) also accounted for 3% of the total and requests which could not be assigned an ACR appropriateness value (ACR-irrelevant requests) accounted for 42% of total requests. The rate of approval of these requests by a primary reviewer only and by a primary reviewer, guidelines, and consultant was 97% and 83%, respectively.Both MR approval mechanisms that were applied in the IAF have not shown a strong correlation with ACR appropriateness criteria, with significant rates of both overuse and underuse of MRI. The high rate of requests that could not be assigned an ACR appropriateness value may indicate a need to broaden the appropriateness criteria coverage of clinical conditions and variants.
Utilizing social media in an emergency can enhance abilities to locate and evacuate casualties more rapidly and effectively, and can contribute towards saving lives following a disaster, through better coordination and collaboration between search and rescue teams.An exercise was conducted in order to test a standard operating procedure (SOP) designed to leverage social media use in response to an earthquake, and study whether social media can improve joint Israeli-Jordanian search and rescue operations following a regional earthquake.First responders from both Jordan and Israel were divided into two mixed groups of eight people each, representing joint (Israeli-Jordanian) EMS teams. Simulated patients were dispersed throughout the Ben-Gurion University Campus. The first search and rescue team used conventional methods, while the second team also used social media channels (Facebook and Twitter) to leverage search and rescue operations.Eighteen EMS and medical professionals from Israel and Jordan, which are members of the Emergency Response Development and Strategy Forum working group, participated in the exercise.The social media team found significantly more mock casualties, 21 out of 22 (95.45%) while the no-media team found only 19 out of 22 (86.36%). Fourteen patients (63.63%) were found by the social media team earlier than the no-media team. The differences between the two groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, and evacuation proved to be significantly quicker in the group that had access to social media. The differences between the three injury severities groups' extraction times in each group were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for variance. Injury severity influenced the evacuation times in the social media team but no such difference was noted in the no-media team.Utilizing social media in an emergency situation enables to locate and evacuate casualties more rapidly and effectively. Social media can contribute towards saving lives during a disaster, in national and bi-national circumstances. Due to the small numbers in the groups, this finding requires further verification on a larger study cohort.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Ben-Gurion University (BGU) in Beer Sheva inaugurated a special training program for junior academic administrative personnel to improve the quality of service in health care organizations through suitable and high-quality administration. The program, the first of its kind in Israel, has been in operation since 1994 and prepares 50 candidates annually for administrative positions within the health system, or a total of 224 graduates to date. The program was founded on the recommendations of a state commission established in 1990 and headed by retired Supreme Court Justice Shoshana Natanyahu (The Natanyahu Commission, 1990). The commission was appointed to examine the performance of the health system in Israel and recommend reforms and changes that would improve the quality and efficiency of health services and the overall performance of the system.This study examined the integration of graduates of the undergraduate program in Health Systems Management (HSM) within the private and public health system in Israel, including employment trends and a retrospective evaluation of the program.Within the framework of the study, questionnaires were sent to all graduates of the program. Participants were requested to answer questions regarding their present place of employment, their satisfaction with their academic degree, how they found employment, and so forth.The research results show that 59% of the graduates of the HSM department at BGU who responded to the questionnaire, worked in the health system upon completion of their studies, and in 2002--at the time of the survey--42% of all graduates were currently employed within the health system. Most of the graduates who entered the system and remained within the system, were women: out of 46 graduates working in the health system today, 38 (83%) are women. It should be noted that while there is some migration of graduates to work in other systems and sectors of the economy, 78% of the respondents believe that the degree program in HSM is justified. Apparently, according to the study, although the health system needs graduates, it does not always know how, or does not always want to or finds difficulty in absorbing the graduates and effectively utilizing their skills to meet the needs of the system.The data reveals that graduates of the undergraduate program in HSM have integrated well into the health system, but not as well as may have been expected. The graduates encountered difficulties in their absorption into management roles in the public health system and felt that the extent of their abilities has yet to be fully recognized and utilized by the system.
The Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps operates a health network for Israel Defense Forces soldiers. Secondary medicine is included in the services to which soldiers are entitled. It is provided to military personnel through two parallel systems: within the Medical Corps specialists' clinics and through the auspices of a number of civilian hospital outpatient clinics. The military medical system, like the civilian medical system, is designed to serve its clientele. One of the indices for ascertainment of satisfaction with medical services is compatibility of client expectations with the service actually received. In this study, we present a gap index that demonstrates that there is gap in satisfaction among soldiers receiving secondary medical services from the military network compared with soldiers who receive secondary medical services from the civilian network. We designed a questionnaire administered to 1,532 soldiers and used 1,359 (89% response rate) for our analysis. The military system provides soldiers with services fully in synch with military regulations. Consequently, in most cases, there is a gap between soldiers' expectations from military medical service and the service they receive in practice-a phenomena that impairs soldier satisfaction. On the other hand, soldiers receiving medical services and treatment from the public civilian system receive, for the most part, service and treatment that meets or even exceeds their expectations because the system operates according to other regulations.