The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of multidetector row CT angiography (MDCTA) of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who did not receive any prior treatment whether interventional or surgical.Twenty-two patients with peripheral vascular occlusive disease (16 male, 6 female, age range 44-85 years) underwent MDCTA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the same districts was performed within 3 months. Images were blindly interpreted by 2 interventional radiologists and compared with the results of digital subtraction angiography.Sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA were 92% and 94%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 93% and 95%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 93%. Normal arterial segments and 100% occlusions were correctly identified in all cases by MDCTA. Moderately stenotic segments interpretation in the calves appeared to be more controversial, but no statistical difference in accuracy in this district was noted with respect to accuracy in more proximal arteries.MDCTA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities is a feasible, accurate imaging modality in clinical practice when compared to DSA.
Information on subcortical ischaemic changes (SIC) in young hypertensive patients is scarce. We evaluated the frequency of SIC at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the possible effect on cognition of these patients, and the role of plasma markers known as indicators of endothelial and haemostatic activation. Inclusion criteria were age
Purpose To determine the relationship between established cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentation and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), as described with computed tomography coronary angiography. Material and methods In this cross-sectional study, we included 567 symptomatic individuals without a history of CAD who consecutively underwent 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for evaluation of suspected CAD. We analyzed the prevalence of CAD depending on sex, age, symptoms and risk factors. Results A total of 8542 segments were analyzed. No evidence of CAD was observed in 225 patients (40%), nonsignificant CAD in 221 patients (39%) and significant CAD (luminal narrowing >50%) in the remaining 121 patients (21%). CAD increased with advancing age, significantly above 50 years (P < 0.05). Female patients had a higher prevalence of normal coronary arteries and males of significant CAD (P < 0.01). With the increase of risk factors, there was a significant increase of the significant disease (P < 0.01). Typical pain with respect to atypical pain had the strongest association with significant CAD (16 vs. 38%; P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the number of risk factors, age, male sex and typical pain remained strong predictors of significant CAD (P < 0.0001). Conclusion Computed tomography coronary angiography may play an important role in risk stratification of patients with suspected CAD.