In the past years there has been a significant increase in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transurethral electroresection of the abundant tissue (TURP) has since the early seventies been the golden standard. The main drawback of a TURP is the relative lack of hemostasis, due to a confined energy and heat distribution around the resection loop. As sufficient tissue needs to be removed to overcome the bladder outlet obstruction, the ideal treatment has to combine both ablative and hemostatic abilities. After 1992, endoscopic laser and 'non laser' treatment modalities have been introduced, that competed with TURP as to clinical outcome. These treatments have in common that a high amounts of energy is delivered to the prostate to remove tissue either indirectly by coagulation necrosis or directly by vaporization. Various in-vitro and clinical studies were performed using different energy sources, such as Nd:YAG and diode laser light in combination with a large variety of delivery devices. Also TURP was included in the evaluation. The in-vitro results provided understanding of the efficiency in energy delivery, the extent of heat induced in the prostatic tissue and possible side-effects, using thermal imaging techniques. Over the last five years clinical data have been collected for various techniques with a follow-up of two years showing the contact techniques to be superior over non-contact and comparable with the outcome of the 'standard' TURP.
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine on urinary bladder function in healthy men who were scheduled for minor orthopaedic surgical procedures. Methods Twenty men were randomly allocated to receive either bupivacaine or lidocaine. Before spinal anesthesia, filling cystometry was performed with the patient in the supine position and a pressure flow study was done with the patient in the standing position. After operation, cystometric measurements were continued until the patient could void urine spontaneously. The levels of analgesia and of motor blockade were recorded. Results The urge to void disappeared immediately after injection of the local anesthetics. There was no difference in the duration of lower extremity motor blockade between bupivacaine and lidocaine. Detrusor blockade lasted significantly longer in the bupivacaine group (means +/- SD, 460 +/- 60 min) than in the lidocaine group (235 +/- 30 min). Total fluid intake and urine volume accumulated during the detrusor blockade were significantly higher in the bupivacaine group than in the lidocaine group. In the bupivacaine group, the total volume of accumulated urine (875 +/- 385 ml) was also significantly higher than cystometric bladder capacity (505 +/- 120 ml) with the risk of over distension of the bladder. Spontaneous voiding of urine did not occur until segmental sensory analgesia had regressed to the third sacral segment. Conclusions Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine causes a clinically significant disturbance of bladder function due to interruption of the micturition reflex. The urge to void disappears quickly and bladder function remains impaired until the block has regressed to the third sacral segment in all patients. With long-acting local anesthetics, the volume of accumulated urine may exceed the cystometric bladder capacity. With respect to recovery of urinary bladder function, the use of short-acting local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia seems to be preferable.
We compared urodynamic and uroflowmetry improvements in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) after transurethral prostate resection, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization.A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of BPH who met the criteria of the International Scientific Committee on BPH, had a prostate volume of between 20 and 65 ml., and a Schäfer obstruction grade of 2 or greater. Before and 6 months after treatment urodynamics and free uroflowmetry were performed.A total of 50, 45 and 46 men were randomized to transurethral prostate resection, laser treatment and electrovaporization, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. Detrusor contractility did not change in any of the treatment groups. The average maximum free flow rate increased by a factor of 2.4 after transurethral prostate resection, 2.5 after laser prostatectomy and 2.4 after electrovaporization. The Schäfer obstruction grade decreased by a factor of 0.3 in all groups. Obstruction (Schäfer grade greater than 2) was not noted after transurethral prostate resection or electrovaporization but it was evident in 2 patients after laser prostatectomy. Effective capacity increased by a factor of 1.5 or more. The incidence of detrusor instability was decreased by half in all groups. The incidence of significant post-void residual urine volume decreased in all groups.There were no significant differences in the improvement in urodynamic and uroflowmetry parameters 6 months after treatment when comparing transurethral prostate resection, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of BPH.
