Atrial fibrillation (AF) following cardiac surgery is common and can complicate postoperative recovery. Amiodarone is a drug frequently used for cardioversion. Some clinicians advocate only in-hospital use of amiodarone until cardioversion, whereas others continue its use for several weeks following cardiac surgery. Inadvertent long-term administration of the drug could be harmful. This study assessed the risk of AF recurrence under 2 different regimens of amiodarone treatment.From January 2005 to July 2007, we reviewed 296 patients who developed postoperative AF. Group A consisted of 198 patients who were discharged on amiodarone treatment, and group B consisted of 98 patients who were discharged without amiodarone treatment. The patients were followed for 8 weeks after cardiac surgery and were observed for the development of symptoms such as palpitations, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, and recurrence of or readmission for AF. In addition, we evaluated a control group of 145 patients with similar characteristics and no postoperative AF for the incidence of stroke and AF and compared the results with their rates in the study groups.Patients discharged on amiodarone therapy were more likely to experience episodes of palpitations than those not on amiodarone (13% versus 10%); however, the rates of AF recurrence were almost the same for the 2 groups (8% and 9%, respectively). The 2 groups also showed no difference in the incidence of TIA and stroke (5% versus 4%). A low incidence of stroke and AF (1%-2%) was observed in patients with no perioperative AF.Long-term treatment of patients with amiodarone should be reconsidered, because it may not be as effective as previously thought in preventing symptoms and AF recurrence. The surprising incidence of neurologic events requires further investigation.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a relatively new procedure, currently for those in whom conventional surgery is too high risk. Preliminary data has been encouraging and a number o...
Objective— Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery is gaining more popularity worldwide. The aim of this United Kingdom (UK) multi-center study was to assess the early clinical outcome of the OPCAB technique and perform a risk-stratified comparison with the conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) using the Cardio-Pulmonary Bypass (CPB) technique. Methods— Data were collected on 5,163 CPB patients from the database of the National Heart and Lung institute, Imperial College, University of London, and on 2,223 OPCAB patients from eight UK cardiac surgical centers, which run established OPCAB surgery programs. All patients had undergone primary isolated CABG for multi-vessel disease through a midline sternotomy approach, between January 1997 and April 2001. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between the CPB and OPCAB patients after adjusting for case-mix. The mortality of the OPCAB patients was also compared, using risk stratification, to the mortality figures reported by the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) based on 28,018 patients in the national database who were operated on between January 1996 and December 1999. Results— Morbidity and mortality were significantly lower in the OPCAB patients compared with the CPB patients and the UK national database of CABG patients, over the same period of time, after adjusting for case-mix. Conclusion— This study demonstrates that risk stratified morbidity and mortality are significantly lower in OPCAB patients than CPB patients and patients in the UK national database.
Study Design This case report illustrates a rare presentation of spinal osteomyelitis that initially manifested as a life-threatening pleural empyema leading to misdiagnosis. Objectives A high index of suspicion is required to make the correct diagnosis of spinal osteomyelitis, especially with unusual presentations. Appropriate antibiotic management should be commenced immediately the diagnosis is made. Summary of Background Data A review of the literature reveals five previous cases of vertebral osteomyelitis associated with pleural effusions. In three of these, the effusions were reactive and sterile. There is only one previous case of a pleural empyema related to primary spinal osteomyelitis. There also is one case report of vertebral osteomyelitis presenting as a mediastinal abscess. Methods A case is presented of a man thought to have bronchogenic carcinoma with a destructive vertebral metastasis who was sent for palliative radiation therapy. A life-threatening pleural effusion subsequently developed, and after additional investigation, he was found to have spinal osteomyelitis with a pleural empyema. Results The empyema was drained through an indwelling chest tube, and the patient was administered appropriate antibiotics. He made a complete and uneventful recovery. Conclusions The case illustrates a rare presentation of spinal osteomyelitis. It exemplifies the dictum that if a malignant disease is suspected, every effort has to be made to establish a histologic diagnosis to prevent inappropriate management and the potentially devastating consequences of an incorrect diagnosis. It also highlights the difficulties in diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis with empyema. With correct management, the prognosis is excellent.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)