TPS1107 Background: Chemotherapy treatments with robust efficacy that preserve quality of life are needed. Tesetaxel (T) is a novel, oral taxane that has potential advantages over currently available taxanes, including: oral administration with a low pill burden and Q3W dosing regimen; no observed hypersensitivity reactions; preclinical evidence of CNS penetration; and improved activity against chemotherapy-resistant tumors. Over 600 pts have been treated with T in clinical studies. T had robust monotherapy activity in a Phase 2 study in 38 pts with HER2-, HR+ MBC who received T Q3W, with a confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1 of 45% and median PFS of 5.4 mo. The confirmed ORR in taxane-pretreated pts was 45%. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that reducing the dose of capecitabine (C) in combination with a taxane may result in reduced toxicity without reduction in efficacy. Preclinical data also suggest that T may penetrate the brain at clinically relevant concentrations. CONTESSA investigates T plus a reduced dose of C as an all-oral regimen in HER2-, HR+ LA/MBC, with revised eligibility criteria to allow inclusion of pts with CNS metastases. Methods: CONTESSA is a 600-pt, multinational, multicenter, randomized (1:1), Phase 3 registration study comparing T (27 mg/m 2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus a reduced dose of C (1,650 mg/m 2 /day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) to the approved dose of C alone (2,500 mg/m 2 /day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) in pts with HER2-, HR+ LA/MBC previously treated with a taxane in the (neo)adjuvant setting. The protocol was newly amended to allow pts with known CNS metastases. The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by an Independent Radiologic Review Committee (IRC). CONTESSA is 90% powered to detect a 42% improvement in PFS (HR = 0.71). Secondary endpoints are OS, ORR, and disease control rate. Enrollment began in Dec 2017. Following review in Jan 2019, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended that the Study continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03326674.
Vasodilatory shock that does not respond to high-dose vasopressors is associated with high mortality. We investigated the effectiveness of angiotensin II for the treatment of patients with this condition.We randomly assigned patients with vasodilatory shock who were receiving more than 0.2 μg of norepinephrine per kilogram of body weight per minute or the equivalent dose of another vasopressor to receive infusions of either angiotensin II or placebo. The primary end point was a response with respect to mean arterial pressure at hour 3 after the start of infusion, with response defined as an increase from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg or an increase to at least 75 mm Hg, without an increase in the dose of background vasopressors.A total of 344 patients were assigned to one of the two regimens; 321 received a study intervention (163 received angiotensin II, and 158 received placebo) and were included in the analysis. The primary end point was reached by more patients in the angiotensin II group (114 of 163 patients, 69.9%) than in the placebo group (37 of 158 patients, 23.4%) (odds ratio, 7.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.76 to 13.3; P<0.001). At 48 hours, the mean improvement in the cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction) was greater in the angiotensin II group than in the placebo group (-1.75 vs. -1.28, P=0.01). Serious adverse events were reported in 60.7% of the patients in the angiotensin II group and in 67.1% in the placebo group. Death by day 28 occurred in 75 of 163 patients (46%) in the angiotensin II group and in 85 of 158 patients (54%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P=0.12).Angiotensin II effectively increased blood pressure in patients with vasodilatory shock that did not respond to high doses of conventional vasopressors. (Funded by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company; ATHOS-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02338843 .).
Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy.Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial.ICUs.Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively).IV angiotensin II or placebo.Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively.In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.
Abstract Background: Chemotherapy treatments with robust efficacy that preserve quality of life are needed. Tesetaxel is a novel, oral taxane that has potential advantages over currently available taxanes, including: oral administration with a low pill burden and once every 3 week (Q3W) dosing; no observed hypersensitivity reactions; preclinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) penetration; and improved activity against chemotherapy-resistant tumors. More than 600 patients have been treated with tesetaxel in clinical studies. Tesetaxel had robust monotherapy activity in a Phase 2 study in 38 patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 of 45% and median PFS of 5.4 months. The confirmed ORR in taxane-pretreated patients also was 45%. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that reducing the dose of capecitabine in combination with a taxane may result in reduced toxicity without a reduction in efficacy. CONTESSA investigates tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine as an all-oral regimen in patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC. Trial design: CONTESSA is a 600-patient, multinational, multicenter, randomized (1:1), Phase 3 registration study comparing tesetaxel (27 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus a reduced dose of capecitabine (1,650 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) to the approved dose of capecitabine alone (2,500 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) in patients with HER2-, HR+ MBC who have received no more than one chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and have received a taxane in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients with known CNS metastases are eligible. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an Independent Radiologic Review Committee (IRC). CONTESSA is 90% powered to detect a 42% improvement in PFS (HR = 0.71). Secondary endpoints are overall survival, ORR and disease control rate. Enrollment began in December 2017. In June 2019, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for CONTESSA recommended that the study continue with no modifications following a planned interim efficacy futility analysis. The interim efficacy futility analysis was based on a pre-specified analysis of the first approximate 100 PFS events that occurred in the study. For further information on this trial, email joconnell@odonate.com or visit clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03326674). Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Martine Piccart, Lee Schwartzberg, Javier Cortes, Nadia Harbeck, Seock-Ah Im, Hope Rugo, Michael Untch, Denise Yardley, Igor Bondarenko, Veronique Dieras, Mark Pegram, Stew Kroll, Joseph O'Connell, Jeff Vacirca, Thomas Wei, Kevin Tang, Andrew Seidman. CONTESSA: A multinational, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 registration study of tesetaxel plus a reduced dose of capecitabine in patients with HER2-, hormone receptor + (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have previously received a taxane [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-09.
TPS1106 Background: Chemotherapy treatments that offer improved quality of life are needed. Tesetaxel (T) is a novel, oral taxane that has potential advantages over currently available taxanes, including: oral administration with a low pill burden and Q3W dosing; no history of hypersensitivity reactions; and improved activity against chemotherapy-resistant tumors (Shionoya 2003; Chan 2006). 555 pts have been treated with T in clinical studies (492 monotherapy; 63 in combination with capecitabine (C)). In MBC, T had robust single-agent activity in 2 multicenter, Phase 2 studies. In TOB203, 38 pts with HER2-, HR+ MBC received single-agent T Q3W for MBC; the confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1 in all 38 pts was 45% (95% CI: 29% - 62%); the median PFS was 5.7 mo (95% CI: 4.1 – 9.8 mo). In a Phase 1 study, the combination of T plus a reduced dose of C was associated with a tolerable AE profile with minimal overlapping toxicity. C is a preferred agent for pts with MBC. Combining the approved dose of C with currently available taxanes results in robust efficacy but significant toxicity, while preclinical and clinical studies suggest that reducing the dose of C in combination with a taxane may result in reduced toxicity without a reduction in efficacy. CONTESSA investigates T plus a reduced dose of C as an all-oral regimen in HER2-, HR+ MBC. Methods: CONTESSA is a 600-pt, multinational, multicenter, randomized (1:1), Phase 3 registration study comparing T (27 mg/m2 on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus a reduced dose of C (1,650 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) to the approved dose of C alone (2,500 mg/m2/day on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) in pts with HER2-, HR+ MBC previously treated with a taxane in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Where indicated, pts must have received endocrine therapy with or without a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The primary endpoint is PFS assessed by an Independent Radiologic Review Committee (IRC). CONTESSA is 90% powered to detect a 42% improvement in PFS (HR = 0.71). Secondary endpoints are OS, ORR assessed by IRC, disease control rate assessed by IRC and patient reported outcomes. Enrollment was initiated in Dec 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT03326674.
TPS10100 Background: A hypoxic microenvironment characterizes solid tumors including soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and is associated with chemotherapy resistance. TH-302, a prodrug of the alkylating agent bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (BR-IPM) is reduced in hypoxic environments, releasing Br-IPM. Combining D with TH-302 should effectively target both the normoxic and hypoxic regions of STS. TH-302 was investigated with full-dose D (75 mg/m 2 ). The regimen was well tolerated, >60% completed 6 cycles. DLTs at higher doses were infection with neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The efficacy was higher than generally reported with single agent D (Sleijfer, The Oncologist, 2005). At MTD (75 mg/m 2 D and 300 mg/m 2 TH-302) best response were 2 (2%) CR, 30 (34%) PR, 43 (48%) SD. Median PFS and OS were 6.7 and 17.5 months, respectively. Based upon these data, a study (NCT01440088) is ongoing to assess the benefit of adding TH-302 to the standard D as first-line therapy of STS. Methods: The randomized (1:1) phase III study of TH-302 (300 mg/m 2 ) with D versus D alone was initiated September 2011. Target goal is 450 patients. TH-302 is administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1 and 8 (21-day cycle). D (75 mg/m 2 , bolus or continuous) is administered Day 1 starting 2-4 hrs after TH-302 when used in combination. Patients receiving TH-302 plus D without progression after 6 cycles may continue on TH-302 alone. Key eligibility criteria: locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS untreated with chemotherapy (adjuvant allowed), ECOG 0/1, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1) and adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal function. A FDA Special Protocol Agreement was reached on study design and analyses. Primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival (OS) comparison of the combination vs D. The study is designed to detect a 40% improvement in OS with 85% power and one-sided alpha of 2.5%. An interim futility PFS analysis is scheduled after 113 PFS events. Significant improvement in PFS (one-sided p < 0.10) is required to continue. A further analysis for early efficacy stoppage is scheduled after 175 OS events. IDMC will monitor safety and efficacy.
e15557 Background: Tumors often consist of highly hypoxic subregions known to be resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. TH-302 is an investigational hypoxia-targeted drug with a 2-nitroimidazole trigger designed to release the DNA alkylator bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM) when reduced in severe hypoxia. Preclinical models demonstrate that treatment with sunitinib increased the tumor hypoxic fraction, the therapeutic target of TH-302. Initiating TH-302 following sunitinib significantly increased the efficacy of sunitinib in these models. In this phase 1 dose escalation study, TH-302 was combined with standard dose sunitinib. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) for the study (NCT01381822) had advanced RCC, GIST or PNET tumors, evaluable disease by RECIST, ECOG ≤2 and acceptable hematologic, hepatic and renal function. Pts received TH-302 in combination with standard full doses of 50 mg PO sunitinib daily from Day 1 to Day 28 of a 6 week cycle. TH-302 was administered IV on Days 8, 15 and 22. TH-302 starting dose was 240 mg/m 2 . The study objectives were to determine the MTD, DLTs and RP2D and to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of TH-302 when used in combination with sunitinib. Results: Ten pts were enrolled. Median age: 63 (range 27-72); Female (5)/ Male (5); ECOG 0 (5); ECOG 1 (5); Primary tumor: RCC (6), GIST (4). Median prior chemotherapies: 3 (range: 0-3) including prior sunitinib in 7 pts. No DLTs were observed in the 3 pts at the 240 mg/m 2 cohort and 1 pt of 5 DLT evaluable in the 340 mg/m 2 cohort had a DLT of stomatitis. Eight pts discontinued (progressive disease (6), pursued other treatment options, adverse event unrelated to study drugs). Three pts had a study drug related SAE (neutropenic sepsis, anemia, hyperthyroidism). Common TH-302 related AEs were nausea and mucosal toxicity and were mostly grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were reported in 4 pts and 3 pts, respectively. One of 4 (25%) pts with GIST had a confirmed PR and 3 of 4 (75%) pts with RCC had PRs including 2 with confirmed PRs. Conclusions: TH-302 can be administered in combination with full dose sunitinib. Mucositis was dose limiting. There is preliminary evidence of activity of TH-302 in combination with sunitinib in RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01381822.
