The experimental synergism of melphalan with DTIC and the ability of transfer factor to improve immunocompetence were the basis of an attempt to improve therapeutic results in disseminated malignant melanoma. Sixty-four evaluable patients with disseminated malignant melanoma were treated in a 21-day cycle as follows: DTIC 250 mg/M2 intravenously days 1 to 5, Connaught BCG 6 × 108 organisms on days 7, 12, and 17 by scarification, and transfer factor 1 unit (109 lymphocytes equivalent, from immunocompetent relatives of patients) subcutaneously on day 12, with or without L-PAM 30 mg/M2 on day 1. Twenty-nine patients received L-PAM and 35 did not. Remission rates of 17% and 23%, respectively, occurred in these groups. An additional 15 patients received DTIC-BCG and three doses of transfer factor on days 7, 12, and 17 and had a remission rate of 20%. Remission duration and survival were compared to historical controls of 111 patients treated with DTIC and 89 treated with DTIC-BCG. Median survival on DTIC-BCG-Transfer Factor was seven months compared to four months for DTIC (P =.003) but did not differ from DTIC-BCG. Addition of L-PAM did not improve remission duration or survival compared to DTIC-BCG but enhanced myelosuppression and immunosuppression. A 60% increase in delayed type hypersensitivity to recall antigens occurred in this study compared to 34% with DTIC-BCG (P =.005). Prognosis and immunocompetence were not directly related. In summary, in this study, (1) transfer factor therapy did not enhance the clinical effects of DTIC-BCG, although it augmented delayed type hypersensitivity to recall antigens; and (2) L-PAM was not additive to DTIC in the treatment of disseminated malignant melanoma and may have abrogated the effect of immunotherapy.
PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.
A total of 535 evaluable febrile episodes in neutropenic patients were randomly assigned to treatment with ticarcillin-clavulanate plus vancomycin (TV), ceftazidime plus vancomycin (CV), or all three antibiotics (TCV). The TCV regimen was significantly more effective than TV, considering all evaluable episodes, documented infections, gram-negative infections, and infections in patients with persistent severe neutropenia (< 100 neutrophils/mm3). The results with CV were intermediate between TV and TCV. The toxicities were similar with all three regimens and consisted primarily of skin rashes. The TCV regimen is effective for empiric therapy of fever in neutropenic patients and probably should be utilized in preference to CV or TV, although its superiority over CV in this study was inconclusive.
Fifty-three patients received intensive treatment with neocarzinostatin in doses of 3500 units/m2 by iv bolus infusion daily for 5-14 days. The response rate for 22 patients with leukemia was 9%. One complete and one partial remission were observed among nine patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast cell crisis. None of the 31 patients with solid tumors responded to treatment. With this dose schedule, prolonged thrombocytopenia and cumulative bone marrow toxicity limit the intensity and duration of neocarzinostatin therapy. Acute allergic reactions occurred in 28% of the treatment courses, and three patients developed anaphylaxis during the second or third course of therapy.
PURPOSE We conducted a phase I trial of the novel nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and efficacy in this population. PATIENT AND METHODS Eligibility requirements included stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 1, and no prior chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. We enrolled patients at doses that ranged from 1,000 to 2,800 mg/m2/wk (three patients per cohort). Responses were assessed after every two courses (8 weeks). RESULTS We treated 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III (n = 5) or IV (n = 28) NSCLC. Most had performance status 1, and 67% had adenocarcinoma. Eight of 32 assessable patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The projected median survival duration (all patients) is 49 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose was 2,200 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks; dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression and reversible transaminase elevation. Other side effects were consistently mild. The maximum dose-intensity achieved with the first two cycles was 2,362 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks, which is a feasible phase II starting dose. CONCLUSION This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.
Fourteen patients with brain metastases from previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with three courses of systemic chemotherapy as an initial mode of treatment. Whole brain irradiation was given concurrently with the fourth course of chemotherapy. The chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1; doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1; vincristine, 1.5 mg IV days 1 and 5; and etoposide, 60 mg/m2 IV days 3 through 5; all repeated every 3 weeks with dosage adjustments. There were ten men and four women, with a median age of 59 years (range, 47 to 75). Six patients had multiple brain lesions, and the brain was the sole site of distant metastasis in four patients. Three patients were inevaluable for response in the brain, as two died early and the third dropped out of the trial too soon. Brain lesions responded to chemotherapy in nine (one complete remission [CR], eight partial remissions [PR]) of 11 (82%) evaluable patients, and objective responses in the extracranial lesions were documented in nine (one CR, eight PR) of 12 (75%) evaluable patients. Median survival was 34 weeks (range, 1 to 93), and two patients are still alive. Toxicity was significant, with severe granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) and thrombocytopenia (less than 50,000/microL) observed in 85% and 15% of patients, respectively. Six patients had major infectious complications, which resulted in septic deaths in two. However, there was no deterioration of neurologic status during the initial phase of treatment with chemotherapy. We conclude that systemic chemotherapy alone can induce objective regression of metastatic brain lesions in patients with previously untreated SCLC.
