SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinomas are rare neoplasms, classified under sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas by the fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of head and neck tumors. It is characterized immunohistochemically by loss of SMARCB1(INI1) expression. We are reporting the case of a 63-year-old man who was evaluated for nasal stuffiness of 3 months duration in another hospital where a radiological evaluation showed a polypoidal soft tissue lesion in the right maxillary sinus extending to the right nasal cavity and spheno-ethmoidal sinus. He underwent excision biopsy which was reported as non- keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma. He was referred to our center with residual disease in spheno-ethmoidal recess for which radiotherapy was given. After completion of radiotherapy, the primary site had no residual disease, but while on follow-up he developed left sided neck nodes within 4 months of completion of treatment. Excision of the lesion was done and histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed it to be metastasis from SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma and not nasopharyngeal carcinoma as diagnosed from the other center. This case is being reported to highlight the diagnostic challenge associated with this rare entity.
11096 Background: Sunlight is a major risk factor for melanoma. Since UV radiation causes DNA damage, it is not surprisingly, that genetic variants in DNA repair enzymes contribute to the susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Presence of common non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism in different DNA repair enzymes were established and correlated with overall survival of melanoma patients. To this end, the SNPs of 6 different DNA repair enzymes were evaluated in a cohort of 742 melanoma patients. The impact of these polymorphisms on overall survival was subsequently calculated by the cox hazard model. Results: This analysis demonstrated that after adjustment to gender and primary tumor T classification XPG 1104 His/His as well as XPD 751 Lys/Lys genotypes were significantly associated with improved survival. Cox hazard coefficients were 0.744 for XPG 1104 His/His (p = 0.0059) and 0.651 for XPD 751 Lys/Lys (p = 0.017). Importantly, bootstrapping confirmed theses results for subpopulations. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that XPG 1104 His/His is an independent factor affecting overall survival (cox coefficient 0.95788; p = 0.0011). Conclusions: XPG codon 1104 polymorphism may be predictive of survival outcome in patients with cutaneous melanoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) presenting as peripheral blood hypereosinophilia is very rare and the incidence is <1%. The characteristic feature of patients with ALL and hypereosinophilia is the absence of blasts in peripheral blood, and this might lead to misdiagnosis of ALL. It is important for clinicians and pathologists to be aware of this uncommon initial presentation of ALL to avoid delay in diagnosis. We report a 37-year-old man who presented with fever and respiratory symptoms and was found to have hypereosinophilia in peripheral blood. His bone marrow and lymph node biopsies were diagnostic of ALL.
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a disease that is heterogeneous in nature, encompassing a diverse array of tumors that originate in the mandible, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and salivary glands. Globally, head and neck malignancies are the sixth most prevalent neoplasm. Approximately 60% of patients present with locally or regionally advanced disease, typically requiring combined modality therapy that includes surgery, radiotherapy, and either chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the established standard of care for patients with inoperable disease or patients for whom surgery would result in unacceptable morbidity. Current radiation techniques limit the dose due to both acute and late toxicities, as well as the complex anatomy of the head and neck region. There is a need for highly conformal techniques that reduce the dose to organs at risk while ensuring adequate target coverage.
Laser-induced autofluorescence (LIAF) and diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) are two emerging noninvasive optical tools that have shown immense potential to detect oral cavity pre-cancer. In a recent study, we have used spectral ratio reference standards (SRRS) of LIAF intensity ratios F500/F635, F500/F685, and F500/F705 for grading of tissues belonging to sites other than dorsal side of tongue (DST), lateral side of tongue (LST), and vermillion border of lip (VBL) that exhibited similar spectral shape for normal and abnormal tissues. This led to dismal diagnostic accuracies, and for the three LIAF-SRRS, normal tissue values were often misclassified as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which means that the true negatives were being wrongly identified as true positives. This study examines the applicability of the site-specific diffuse reflection spectral intensity ratio (R545/R575) of the oxygenated hemoglobin bands to classify different DST lesions and compares the results obtained with those obtained using LIAF-SRRS. DRS-SRRS of R545/R575 differentiated benign hyperplastic DST tissues from normal tissue with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 80%, which were indistinguishable using LIAF-SRRS. Further, in distinguishing hyperplastic tissues from premalignant dysplastic lesions, DRS-SRRS gave a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 86%, as compared to sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 72% shown by the three LIAF-SRRS together. The diagnostic accuracy and statistical adequacy of the two techniques were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-Curve) analysis. Three LIAF ratios gave a low overall ROC area under curve (ROC-AUCs) of 0.521, whereas the DR ratio (R545/R575) has shown an improved accuracy of 0.970 in differentiating different tissue types. While distinguishing hyperplastic from dysplastic tissues, the DR ratio gave a higher discrimination accuracy of 0.9. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the DRS-SRRS technique by virtue of its low cost and higher diagnostic accuracies could be a viable alternate to LIAF-SRRS for in vivo screening of tongue pre-cancers and grading of different tissue types.