Purpose: Cost reduction is a major focus of the solar industry. Thin film technologies and concentration systems are viable ways to reducing cost, with unique strengths and weakness for both. Most of the concentrating PV work focuses on high concentration systems for reducing energy cost. Meanwhile, many believe that low concentrators provide significant cost reduction potential while addressing the mainstream PV market with a product that acts as a flat panel replacement. This paper analyzes the relative benefit of asymmetric vs. symmetric optics for low-concentrators in light of specific PV applications. Approach: Symmetric and asymmetric concentrating PV module performance is evaluated using computer simulation to determine potential value across various geographic locations and applications. The selected optic design is modeled against standard cSi flat panels and thin film to determine application fit, system level energy density and economic value. Results: While symmetric designs may seem ideal, asymmetric designs have an advantage in energy density. Both designs are assessed for aperture, optimum concentration ratio, and ideal system array configuration. Analysis of performance across climate specific effects (diffuse, direct and circumsolar) and location specific effects (sunpath) are also presented. The energy density and energy production of low concentrators provide a compelling value proposition. More significantly, the choice of optics for a low concentrating design can affect real world performance. With the goal of maximizing energy density and return on investment, this paper presents the advantages of asymmetric optic concentration and illustrates the value of this design within specific PV applications.
We optimized the gallium nitride(GaN)photocathode’s structure in three aspects for higher quantum efficiency. AlN is used to replace GaN as the buffer layer, which can act as potential barrier to reflect electrons back to surface. The optimal thickness of emission layer is calculated as 162.5nm, and considering the graded doping profile, we optimized the thickness as 180nm. Three built-in electric fields are introduced by Mg graded doping, and the intensities of the high fields are calculated to give the quantitive results of their influence on quantum efficiency. After surface cleaning and activation, quantum efficiency of the optimized sample was greatly increased and the highest value of 56% was achieved at 5.20eV. More quantum efficiency enchancement is possible by further optimizing the photocathode structure.
Under the assumption that human visual perception is highly adapted for extracting structural information from a scene, we present a new approach using structural similarity index for assessing quality in image fusion. The advantages of our measures are that they do not require a reference image and can be easily computed. Numerous simulations demonstrate that our measures are conform to subjective evaluations and can be able to assess different image fusion methods.
An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
Increasing momentum around several different types of concentrating flat panel designs provides challenges with respect to modeling energy harvest. While there have been several simulation models created for standard flat panel PV modules, simulating low concentrating PV modules is more complex and less readily available. Specifically, since the optical characteristics of each low concentrating module is different, the energy prediction model must incorporate an optical model specific to the concentrator design. A PV module energy production model is created using a solar irradiance model (combining HDKR, NREL data and Meteonorm) and optical models for different panel types. Resulting energy production values are then correlated with actual measurements to verify the model and methodology. The simulation model is exercised across various geographic latitudes to illustrate how different module types can be most useful in specific locations. The results show an illustrative guideline for predicting module production and therefore selection. The model is specific to energy production and is useful to compare different module technologies under various conditions. Key findings include the following: optics engineers should consider application related issues when modeling various concentrating flat panel designs; computer scientists working on energy harvest software (e.g., PV Watts) need to include optics issues related to each concentrating flat panel; aberrations in climate databases can cause significant biases in energy harvest output; and system installers should follow manufacturer guidelines when installing concentrating flat panels.
To establish a methode for predicting the integral sensitivity of transmission-mode GaAs photocathodes, the relationship between X-ray relative diffraction intensity and integral sensitivity of GaAlAs/GaAs photocathode material is researched. After thermocompression bonding Si 3 N 4 /GaAlAs/GaAs/GaAlAs/GaAs epitaxial material to glass window in the vacuum condition, and chemically etching the GaAlAs buffer-layer and GaAs substrate, the glass/Si 3 N 4 /GaAlAs/GaAs photocathode module is formed. The X-ray relative diffraction intensity of the photocathode module is tested and calculated respectively, then the photocathode surface was activated in the ultrahigh vacuum chamber using the Cs-O activation technique. Following that, the integral sensitivity of the transmission-mode GaAs photocathode is measured by the spectral response measurement instrument in situ. It is found that the GaAlAs/GaAs photocathode material and photocathode module have similar X-ray relative diffraction shapes. The higher the similar degree of X-ray relative diffraction shape is, the bigger the X-ray relative diffraction intensity of photocathode module is, which results in the better photoemission capability and higher photocathode integral sensitivity. This method can be used as an evaluation criterion for the quality of transmission-mode GaAs photocathode module material.
An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
To explore the optic properties of transmission-mode GaAs photocathode module, experimental and theoretical values of reflectance and transmittance of photocathode module has been compared. it showns that experemental curves cannot tally with theoretical curves completely. The variation range of initial values of thickness is firstly setted. Modifing transmittance formula by a fitting coefficient A, optical properties is fitted using the method of error control. R-T combined error reduced from 15.2% to 4.9% using R-T combined error control scheme. Optimal fitting values of thickness of photocathode module are obtained, which are d 1 = 110 nm, d 2 = 1019 nm, d 3 = 1491 nm. And the error of total thickness is 2.9%.
An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.