Several studies have revealed that the preoperative serum testosterone and percent tumor volume (PTV) predict extra-prostatic extension (EPE) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. This study investigated the prognostic significance of serum testosterone and PTV in relation to EPE and BCR after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We reviewed 520 patients who underwent LRP between 2004 and 2012. PTV was determined as the sum of all visually estimated tumor foci in every section. BCR was defined as two consecutive increases in the postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng ml-1 . The threshold for serum total testosterone was 3.0 ng ml-1 . Multivariate logistic regression was used to define the effect of variables on the risk of EPE and BCR. A low serum testosterone (<3.0 ng ml-1 ) was associated with a high serum PSA, Gleason score, positive core percentage of the prostate biopsy, PTV, and all pathological variables. On multivariate analysis, similar to previous studies, the serum PSA, biopsy positive core percentage, Gleason score, and pathological variables predicted EPE and BCR. In addition, low serum testosterone (<3.0 ng ml-1 , adjusted OR, 8.52; 95% CI, 5.04-14.4, P= 0.001) predicted EPE and PTV (adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05, P= 0.046) predicted BCR. In addition to previous predictors of EPE and BCR, low serum testosterone and PTV are valuable predictors of EPE and BCR after LRP.
Aims: Natural history of young patients with bladder cancer has not yet been known. So this study aimed to understand characteristics and prognosis of patients less than 40 years with bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 42 patients (group 1) less than 40 years with bladder cancer followed up for 6 months at least from October 1998 to January 2010. As controlled group (group 2) consisted 44 patients of 60 years or more who had same condition as above mentioned from January to December 2009 was set. Tumor size and number, pathological results, urine cytology results and recurrence rate were reviewed. Results: The mean ages and the gender distribution in the two groups showed no difference. Tumor size (P = 0.021) and number (P = 0.016) in group 1 was smaller than control. The proportion of muscle invasive type was not significant, but pTa in group 1 was occupied larger portion than group 2 (P = 0.01). Group 1 had more low grade cancer (P = 0.013), and lower recurrence rate (7.1%) than group 2 (38.6%) (P = 0.001). In addition, the mean recurrence free duration of group 1 and 2 were 37.7 ± 6.3 and 9.9 ± 2.5 months, respectively. Group 1 showed later relapse than group 2 (P = 0.002). No progression in stage at recurrence was in group 1, but 1 case had progression in group 2. In grade, 1 case was worsen in group 1 and 3 cases were worsen in group 2.