Gastric cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer death.However the proportion of early gastric cancer (EGC) at diagnosis is increasing.Endoscopic treatment for EGC is actively performed worldwide in cases meeting specific criteria.Endoscopic mucosal resection can treat EGC with comparable results to surgery for selected cases.Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) increases the en bloc and complete resection rates and reduces the local recurrence rate.ESD has been performed with expanded indication and is expected to be more widely used in the treatment of EGC through the technological advances in the near future.This review will describe the techniques, indications and outcomes of endoscopic treatment for EGC.
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is defined as recurring, angina-like, retrosternal chest pain of noncardiac origin. Although patients with NCCP have excellent long-term prognosis, most suffer persistently from their symptoms. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been suggested, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal motility disorder, esophageal hyper-sensitivity, and psychological comorbidity. Among them, GERD is the most common cause of NCCP. Therefore, GERD should first be considered as the underlying cause of symptoms in patients with NCCP. Empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment with a preferably double dose for more than 2 months could be cost-effective. PPI test can also be used for diagnosis of GERD-related NCCP, but it should be considered for patients with NCCP occurring at least weekly and its duration should be at least 2 weeks. However, upper endoscopy and esophageal pH monitoring are necessary when the diagnosis of GERD is uncertain. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring could further improve the diagnostic yield. Patients with GERD-related NCCP should preferably be treated with a double dose PPI until symptoms remit (may require more than 2 months of therapy for optimal symptom control), followed by dose tapering to determine the lowest PPI dose that can control symptoms. However, treatment of patients with non-GERD− related NCCP is challenging. An empirical treatment of antidepressants could be considered. If there are specific esophageal motility disorders, smooth muscle relaxants or endoscopic treatment may be considered in selected cases. If none of these traditional treatments is effective, a psychology consultation for cognitive behavioral therapy should be considered.)
It is unclear whether renal insufficiency (RI) itself is a risk factor for adverse outcomes after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in patients with and without RI using propensity score-matching analysis.In all, 4775 patients with 4775 early gastric cancer lesions undergoing ESD were analyzed. 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed between patients with and without RI using 12 variables. After matching, logistic regression and survival analyses were performed for short- and long-term outcomes of ESD, respectively.The matching yielded 188 pairs of patients with and without RI. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, the presence of RI was not significantly associated with postprocedural bleeding (unadjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.42; adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.65, respectively). When RI patients were subclassified into patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , no significant differences in bleeding rates were found compared to their matched controls in both groups. Perforation, en bloc resection, en bloc and R0 resection, and curative resection rates of RI patients were 2.1%, 98.4%, 91.0%, and 78.2%, respectively, which were comparable to those of non-RI patients. During a median follow-up of 119 months, there was no difference in gastric cancer-specific survival between patients with and without RI (P = 0.143).The outcomes of ESD were comparable in patients with and without RI. Decreased renal function itself may not be a reason to keep patients with RI from receiving gastric ESD.
Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is an aggressive cancer with high incidence and mortality. It is crucial to predict prognosis of these patients individually. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported as a prognostic indicator in several tumors, including esophageal cancer. Besides inflammatory factors, nutritional status can impact survival of cancer patients. Albumin (Alb) concentration is an easily obtained indicator to reflect nutritional status.In this study, we retrospectively collected the data of patients with ESCC and used univariate and multivariate analysis to investigate the relationship between combination of NLR and Alb (NLR-Alb) and survival. Meanwhile, we compared clinical features among NLR-Alb cohorts.Univariate analysis showed that age (P=0.013), gender (P=0.021), surgical type (P=0.031), preoperative therapy (P=0.007), NLR-Alb (P=0.001), and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) status (P<0.001) were associated with 5-year overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis, NLR-Alb [hazard ratio (HR) =2.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.38-4.63, P=0.003] and TNM status (HR =4.76, 95% CI: 3.09-7.33, P<0.001) were independent predictive factors for 5-year OS. The 5-year OS rates were 83%, 62%, and 55% for NLR-Alb 1, NLR-Alb 2, and NLR-Alb 3, respectively (P=0.001).In summary, pre-operative NLR-Alb is a favorable and cost-effective index to predict prognosis of patients with ESCC individually.
Dysphagia is difficulty in swallowing that can be caused by a number of disorders that involve either the oropharynx or the esophagus.Specific endoscopic treatment for dysphagia depends on its etiology, whether the dysphagia is caused by mechanical narrowing or a motor disorder.Variable endoscopic treatment strategies can be used to manage dysphagia.Patient with dysfunction of the upper esophageal sphincter may benefit from esophageal dilationor injection of botulinum toxin.Pneumatic balloon dilation, injection of botulinum toxin, peroral endoscopic myotomy can be considered as treatment options for esophageal motility disorders.Endoscopic dilation is the treatment choice of esophageal stricture, while intraluminal steroid injection and temporary stent can be considered in refractory benign esophageal stricture.Self-expandable metal stent insertion can be considered for dysphagia with malignant cause.(
Many patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) also present with extraesophageal symptoms (EESs). This study sought to determine the prevalence of concomitant EESs and to evaluate quality of life (QOL) impairment in a Korean population with GERD.This questionnaire-based study was carried out from 64 hospitals in Korea between October 2008 and March 2009. Patients with typical GERD symptoms of heartburn or acid regurgitation were recruited for study. Participants filled out questionnaire consisting of GerdQ questions and EES questions. All participants underwent endoscopy and were divided into patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD) and with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).A total of 1,712 patients were included in this study. Of these, 697 (40.7%) patients had ERD and 1,015 (59.3%) NERD. The prevalence of EES was 90.3%. The most prevalent EES was epigastric burning (73.2%), followed by globus (51.8%), chest pain (48.4%), cough (32.0%), hoarseness (24.2%) and wheezing (17.3%). Individual EES was more prevalent in patients with ERD than in those with NERD. Regarding QOL, 701 patients (41.0%) had sleep disturbance and 676 (37.7%) had taken additional over-the-counter medication for heartburn and/or regurgitation, which were more prevalent in patients with ERD than in those with NERD (49.5% vs. 35.1% and 45.8% vs. 32.2%, respectively; all P < 0.001).The prevalence of EES is high in Korean patients with symptomatic GERD. Individual EES is more prevalent in patients with ERD than in those with NERD. QOL impairment is observed less frequently than previous studies.
'%3e%3cg id='b'%3e%3cpath id='a' stroke='%23000' stroke-width='2' d='M-6-25H6m-12 3H6m-12 3H6'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' y='44'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' d='M0 17v10'/%3e%3ccircle r='12' fill='%23cd2e3a'/%3e%3cpath fill='%230047a0' d='M0-12A6 6 0 0 0 0 0a6 6 0 0 1 0 12 12 12 0 0 1 0-24z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cg transform='rotate(-123.69)'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' d='M0-23.5v3M0 17v3.5m0 3v3'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)