Correct and early risk stratification for critically ill pneumonia patients remains an unmet medical need. This study aimed to test whether N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) can serve as a prognostic marker in this setting.This prospective study enrolled 216 pneumonia patients admitted to intensive care unit. Plasma NT-proBNP samples were obtained upon admission and primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Meanwhile, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) 2007 minor criteria were assessed.Overall 30-day mortality was 30%. NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than survivors (11 938 ± 13 121 vs 5658 ± 9240 pg/mL, P = 0.001). Area under receiver operating characteristic curves of NT-proBNP, APACHE II and IDSA/ATS 2007 minor criteria were not significantly different regarding prediction of mortality (0.715, 0.754 vs 0.654, P = 0.085). Adding NT-proBNP to APACHE II significantly increased the area under receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.754 to 0.794 (P = 0.048). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal NT-proBNP and APACHE II cut-offs of 2177.5 pg/mL and 25.5, respectively. In multivariate analysis, both NT-proBNP and APACHE II values above cut-offs had a significantly higher probability of death than those below cut-offs. A categorical approach combining NT-proBNP and APACHE II cut-offs provides additional risk stratification over a single marker approach.For pneumonia patients admitted to intensive care unit, NT-proBNP strongly and independently predicts mortality, and its prognostic accuracy is comparable with APACHE II and IDSA/ATS 2007 minor criteria.
Aim Intrahospital transportation (IHT) of patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) significantly increases the risk of patient harm. A structured process performed by a well-prepared team with adequate communication among team members plays a vital role in enhancing patient safety during transportation. Design and implementation We conducted this quality improvement programme at the intensive care units of a university-affiliated medical centre, focusing on the care of patients under MV who received IHT for CT or MRI examinations. With the interventions based on the analysis finding of the IHT process by healthcare failure mode and effects analysis, we developed and implemented strategies to improve this process, including standardisation of the transportation process, enhancing equipment maintenance and strengthening the teamwork among the transportation teammates. In a subsequent cycle, we developed and implemented a new process with the practice of reminder-assisted briefing. The reminders were printed on cards with mnemonics including ‘VITAL’ (Vital signs, Infusions, Tubes, Alarms and Leave) attached to the transportation monitors for the intensive care unit nurses, ‘STOP’ (Secretions, Tubes, Oxygen and Power) attached to the transportation ventilators for the respiratory therapists and ‘STOP’ (Speak-out, Tubes, Others and Position) attached to the examination equipment for the radiology technicians. We compared the incidence of adverse events and completeness and correctness of the tasks deemed to be essential for effective teamwork before and after implementing the programme. Results The implementation of the programme significantly reduced the number and incidence of adverse events (1.08% vs 0.23%, p=0.01). Audits also showed improved teamwork during transportation as the team members showed increased completeness and correctness of the essential IHT tasks (80.8% vs 96.5%, p<0.001). Conclusion The implementation of reminder-assisted briefings significantly enhanced patient safety and teamwork behaviours during the IHT of mechanically ventilated patients with critical illness.
Patients with symptoms of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be classified with the term asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). ACO is of considerable interest as it is currently poorly characterised and has been associated with worse health outcomes and higher healthcare costs compared with COPD or asthma alone. Patients with ACO in Asia remain poorly described, and there is limited information regarding their resource utilisation compared with patients with asthma or COPD only. This study investigated the characteristics, disease burden and medical resource utilisation of patients with ACO in Taiwan. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients identified from National Health Insurance (NHI) claims data in Taiwan in 2009–2011. Patients were classified into incident ACO, COPD or asthma cohorts according to International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, clinical modification codes in claims. Eligible patients were ≥40 years of age with 12 months' continuous enrolment in the NHI programme pre- and post-index date (date of the first relevant medical claim). Patients with ACO (N = 22,328) and COPD (N = 69,648) were older and more likely to be male than those with asthma (N = 50,293). Patients with ACO had more comorbidities and exacerbations, with higher medication use: short-acting β2-agonist prescriptions ranged from 30.4% of patients (asthma cohort) to 43.6% (ACO cohort), and inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination prescriptions ranged from 11.1% (COPD cohort) to 35.0% (ACO cohort) in the 12 months following index. Patients with ACO generally had the highest medication costs of any cohort (long-acting muscarinic antagonist costs ranged from $227/patient [asthma cohort] to $349/patient [ACO cohort]); they also experienced more respiratory-related hospital visits than patients with asthma or COPD (mean outpatient/inpatient visits per patient post-index: 9.1/1.9 [ACO cohort] vs 5.7/1.4 [asthma cohort] and 6.4/1.7 [COPD cohort]). Patients with ACO in Taiwan experience a greater disease burden with greater healthcare resource utilisation, and higher costs, than patients with asthma or COPD alone.
The possible association of patient safety events (PSEs) with the costs and utilization remains a concern. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated adult hospitalizations at a medical center between 2010 and 2015 with or without reported PSEs. Administrative and claims data were analyzed to compare the costs and length of stay (LOS) between cases with and without PSEs of the three most common categories during the first 14 days of hospitalization. Two models, including linear regression and propensity score-matched comparison, were performed for each reference day group of hospitalizations. Of 14,181 PSEs from 424,635 hospitalizations, 69.8% were near miss or no-harm events. Costs and LOS were similar between fall cases and controls in all of the 14 reference days. In contrast, for cases of tube and line events and controls, there were consistent differences in costs and LOS in the majority of the reference days (86% and 57%, respectively). Consistent differences were less frequently seen for medication events and control events (36% and 43%, respectively). Our study approach of comparing cases with PSEs and those without any PSE showed significant differences in costs and LOS for tube and line events, and medication events. No difference in cost or LOS was found regarding fall events. Further studies exploring adjustments for event risks and harm-oriented analysis are warranted.
Abstract Background: Higher prevalence rate of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, among them have ventilated at home. However, unplanned hospital readmission of home ventilated patients remains a critical issue. Therefore, to explore the characteristics and prognosis of unplanned readmissions of patients using a home ventilator and to analyze relevant pre-discharge factors that affect such unplanned readmissions. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to collect medical record data for 2013–2017 on the readmission of home-ventilated patients in a medical center in northern Taiwan. In all, 127 cases were considered. Unplanned readmissions were divided by time intervals (≤ 30 days, 31–180 days, 181–365 days, ≥ 366 days) into an early readmission group (≤ 30 days) and a late readmission group (≥ 31 days). Statistical analysis, a chi-square test, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis model were used to verify the factors influencing the readmission of home-ventilated patients. Results: Patients’ populations according to the intervals of unplanned readmission (≤ 30 days, 31–180 days, 181–365 days, ≥ 366 days) were 42 (33.1%), 60 (47.2%), 17 (13.4%), and 8 (6.3%), respectively. The average intervals of home care for the early readmission group (≤ 30 days) and the late readmission group (≥ 31 days) were 15.1 ± 9.2 and 164.8 ± 143.2 days, respectively. Regarding risk factors of early and late unplanned hospital readmission, the odds ratio (OR) for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease compared with those without this disease was 4.535 (95% CI 1.253 -16.413). For maximum inspiratory pressure ≦ −30 cmH2O compared with > −30 cmH2O, the OR for early readmission was 0.207 (95% CI 0.056 - 0.767). For hemoglobin ≥ 10.1 g/dL compared with < 10.1 g/dL, the OR of early readmission was 0.280 (95% CI 0.082 - 0.958). Conclusion: Pre-discharge problems, including chronic cardiovascular disease, maximum inspiratory pressure, and reduced hemoglobin, are risk factors for unplanned early hospitalization readmission of patients using a ventilator at home. Therefore, attention should be paid to these risk factors during discharge planning.
Decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacterales is an emerging concern. Conventional methods with short turnaround times are crucial for therapeutic decisions and infection control. In the current study, we used the Xpert CARBA-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France) assays for carbapenemase detection in 214 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) blood isolates. We used the modified carbapenem inactivation method, conventional PCR, and sequencing to determine the production of five common carbapenemase families and their subtypes. We performed wzc-genotyping for all CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and multilocus sequence typing for all carbapenemase-producing CRE isolates to reveal their genetic relatedness. The results showed a sensitivity of 99.8% and a specificity of 100% by the Xpert assay, and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% by the NG-Test in detecting carbapenemases of 84 CRKP isolates with only one (VIM-1+IMP-8) failure in both tests. For CR-Escherichia coli, four carbapenemase-producing isolates were detected accurately for their subtypes. The two major clones of carbapenemase-producing CRKP isolates in Taiwan were ST11-K47 producing KPC-2 (n = 47) and ST11-K64 producing OXA-48-like (n = 9). Our results support the use of either test in routine laboratories for the rapid detection of common carbapenemases. Caution should be taken using the Xpert assay in areas with a high prevalence of CRE carrying blaIMP-8. IMPORTANCE Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are emerging worldwide, causing nosocomial outbreaks and even community-acquired infections since their appearance 2 decades ago. Our previous national surveillance of CPE isolates in Taiwan identified five carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA, NDM, VIM, and IMP) with the KPC-2 and OXA-48-like types predominant. Timely detection and classification of carbapenemases in CPE may be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control. Genetic detection methods using the Xpert CARBA-R assay and the immunochromatographic assay using the NG-Test CARBA 5 have been validated with the advantage of short turnaround time. Our study demonstrated that the NG and Xpert assays are convenient methods to accurately identify carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli blood isolates. Detecting IMP variants remains challenging, and the results of Xpert CARBA-R assay should be carefully interpreted.
Raw Datasets for the study 'In-hospital patient safety events, healthcare costs and utilization: an analysis of data from the incident reporting system in an academic medical center'.