The optimal analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is still unknown.Our aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis and systematic review to compare the efficacy of different analgesic strategies in VATS.Bayesian network meta-analysis.We searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Springer, Google Scholar, and Web of Science to evaluate all relevant randomized controlled trials that investigated the analgesic effects of different regional analgesia methods for VATS published through July 2021. After a comprehensive search of electronic databases, the following methods were identified: epidural analgesia (EA), local anesthetics (LA), superficial serratus anterior plane block (SSAPB), deep serratus anterior plane block (DSAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), paravertebral block (PVB), and intercostal nerve block (ICNB). Primary outcomes were the visual analog scale score at rest, at 2 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative analgesic consumption, incidence of nausea and emesis, and pruritus.Overall, 35 trials met our inclusion criteria. EA and PVB were relatively more advantageous in terms of analgesic effect at 2 hours and 6 hours postoperatively; the EA group was superior to the DSAPB, ESPB, and ICNB groups at 24 hours postoperatively. EA was found to be superior to other analgesia techniques for 24 hour postoperative analgesic consumption., PVB showed advantages in reducing postoperative nausea, emesis, and pruritus.Different concentrations and volumes of local anesthetics might affect the analgesic effects of the various analgesia techniques.EA and PVB have certain advantages in analgesia, but the incidence of postoperative pruritus after EA is higher. At the same time, considering the risk of coagulation and puncture complications, PVB may be a better choice.
In this meta-analysis, we investigated the success rate of subclavian venous catheterization (SVC) as well as the incidence of related complications when performed via the supraclavicular (SC) or traditional infraclavicular (IC) approaches. Ignoring the original language, we identified and analyzed eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published on or before December 30, 2018, after searching the following five bibliographic databases: PubMed, Springer, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. All included studies compared the clinical safety and efficiency of the SC and IC approaches for SVC in adults. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of each RCT. Cannulation failure rates and the incidence of malposition were regarded as the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included cannulation access time and the incidence of pneumothorax and artery puncture. Failure rates were significantly lower for SVC via the SC approach than via the IC approach [odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47 to 0.93]. The SC approach was also associated with a decreased incidence of catheter malposition, relative to that observed for the IC approach [odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.46]. The SC approach did not reduce the time required for cannulation [mean difference, −74.74; 95% CI, −157.80 to 8.33], and there were no differences in the incidence of artery puncture [odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.23] or pneumothorax [odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.33 to 2.40]. Our findings suggest that SVC via the SC approach should be utilized in adults.
This prospective study aimed to evaluate the ability of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound measurements of carotid-corrected flow time and changes in corrected carotid flow time (FTc) induced by volume expansion to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a modified head-down lithotomy position. FTc was measured using Doppler images of the common carotid artery before and after volume expansion. The stroke volume index at each time point was recorded using the MostCare instrument. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a stroke volume index ≥10% increase after volume expansion. Half (50%) of the 52 patients responded positively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves measured to predict fluid responsiveness for the corrected carotid flow time and changes in the FTc were 0.82 [95% confidence interval:0.705–0.937; P < 0.0001] and 0.67 (95% confidence interval:0.520–0.815; P < 0.05), respectively. The optimal cut-off value for the FTc and the change in FTc were 356.5 ms and 19.5 ms, respectively. FTc is a more reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness than FTc induced by volume expansion in gynecological patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position.
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound measurements of carotid corrected flow time and its changes induced by volume expansion to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecological surgery. Methods In this prospective study, carotid corrected flow time was measured using Doppler images of the common carotid artery before and after volume expansion. The stroke volume index at each time point was recorded using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring with MostCare. Of the 52 patients enrolled, 26 responded. Results The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the carotid corrected flow time and changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion were 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. Their optimal cut-off values were 357 and 19.5 ms, respectively. Conclusion Carotid corrected flow time was superior to changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion for predicting fluid responsiveness in this population.
Abstract Purpose We aimed to evaluate the ability of carotid corrected flow time assessed by ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. Methods This prospective single-center study conducted at the Chongqing University Cancer Hospital included patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. Carotid doppler parameters and hemodynamic data, including corrected flow time, pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation, and stroke volume index at a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight and after increasing the tidal volume to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (tidal volume challenge), respectively, were measured. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a stroke volume index ≥10% increase after volume expansion. Results Among the 52 patients included, 26 were classified as fluid responders and 26 as non-responders based on the stroke volume index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values measured to predict the fluid responsiveness to corrected flow time and changes in PPV (ΔPPV 6–8 ) after tidal volume challenge were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705–0.937; P < 0.0001] and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.740–0.956; P < 0.0001), respectively. Both values were higher than those for PPV at a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg (0.79, 95% CI: 0.674–0.911; P = 0003). The optimal cut-off values for corrected flow time and ΔPPV 6–8 were 356.5 ms and >1%, respectively. Conclusion The change in PPV after tidal volume challenge and corrected flow time reliably predicted fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register (CHiCTR2200060573)
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)