No AccessJournal of UrologyPediatric Urology: Editorial1 Mar 1997Penile Length in Adulthood After Exstrophy Reconstruction Richard I. Silver, Andrew Yang, Jacob Ben-Chaim, Robert D. Jeffs, and John P. Gearhart Richard I. SilverRichard I. Silver , Andrew YangAndrew Yang , Jacob Ben-ChaimJacob Ben-Chaim , Robert D. JeffsRobert D. Jeffs , and John P. GearhartJohn P. Gearhart View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65131-0AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We attempted to determine whether the penis in adulthood after exstrophy reconstruction is short because of a congenital defect in the size of the corpora cavernosa. Materials and Methods: Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 10 men who underwent exstrophy reconstruction in childhood, and 10 age and race matched controls. Measurements of penile and pelvic anatomy were compared. Results: The corpora cavernosa in men after exstrophy reconstruction were shorter than normal. Dividing total corporeal length into an anterior and posterior segment revealed that the anterior segment was short but the posterior segment attached to the pubic ramus was normal. However, the diameter of the posterior corporeal segment was greater than in controls. Although diastasis of the symphysis pubis increased the intersymphyseal and intercorporeal distances, the angle between the corpora cavernosa was unchanged, presumably because the corporeal bodies were separated in a parallel fashion. Conclusions: After exstrophy reconstruction the penis is short in adulthood, at least partially due to a congenital deficiency of corporeal tissue. Since diastasis of the pubic symphysis and chordee decrease penile visibility, approximation of the pubic symphysis and procedures to straighten the penis may improve cosmesis. However, because the corpora cavernosa are short, after exstrophy reconstruction the penis will always be shorter than normal in adulthood. References 1 : The genital aspects of exstrophy. J. Urol.1975; 113: 701. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Bladder exstrophy: penile lengthening procedure. Urology1984; 24: 434. Google Scholar 3 : Anatomy of the penis and its deformities in exstrophy and epispadias. J. Urol.1984; 132: 1122. Link, Google Scholar 4 : The anatomical course of the neurovascular bundles in epispadias. J. Urol.1986; 136: 68. Link, Google Scholar 5 : The anatomy of the pelvis in the exstrophy complex. J. Bone Joint Surg.1995; 77: 177. Google Scholar 6 : A method of lengthening and repairing the penis in exstrophy of the bladder. J. Urol.1958; 79: 237. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Penile lengthening after previous repair of epispadias. J. Urol.1979; 121: 527. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Male epispadias: surgical repairs of urethropenile deformity. Brit. J. Urol.1976; 48: 127. Google Scholar 9 : Lengthening of the congenital or acquired short penis. Brit. J. Urol.1974; 46: 685. Google Scholar 10 : Reconstruction of the external genitalia in exstrophy of the bladder: preliminary communication. J. Urol.1974; 111: 830. Link, Google Scholar 11 : Repair of secondary genital deformities of epispadias/exstrophy. Clin. Plast. Surg.1988; 15: 381. Google Scholar 12 : Reconstruction of the epispadiac penis in adolescents. Prog. Ped. Surg.1989; 23: 165. Google Scholar 13 : The treatment of penile chordee using corporeal rotation. J. Urol.1984; 131: 931. Link, Google Scholar 14 : The exstrophic anomalies and their surgical reconstruction. Curr. Prob. Surg.August 1974; : 1. Google Scholar 15 : Epispadias and exstrophy. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.1969; 62: 1079. Google Scholar 16 : The surgical treatment of epispadias. Surg., Gynec. & Obst.1963; 117: 465. Google Scholar 17 : A procedure for lengthening the phallus in boys with exstrophy of the bladder. J. Ped. Surg.1971; 6: 645. Google Scholar 18 : Urethral reconstruction in boys with classical bladder exstrophy. J. Urol.1984; 131: 512. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Use of paraexstrophy skin pedicle grafts for correction of exstrophy and epispadias repair. Birth Defects1977; 13: 175. Google Scholar 20 : Anterior pelvic osteotomy of superior pubic ramus to facilitate bladder exstrophy repair. Dial. Ped. Urol.1993; 16: 3. Google Scholar 21 : The Cantwell-Ransley technique for repair of epispadias. J. Urol.1992; 148: 851. Link, Google Scholar 22 : Penile deformity in bladder exstrophy: correlation with closure of pelvic defect. J. Ped. Surg.1991; 26: 201. Google Scholar 23 : A combined vertical and horizontal pelvic osteotomy approach for initial and secondary repair of bladder exstrophy. J. Urol.1996; 155: 689. Abstract, Google Scholar 24 : Questions that worry children with exstrophy. Pediatrics1974; 53: 242. Google Scholar 25 : Long-term followup of cosmetic appearance and genital function in boys with exstrophy: review of 53 patients. J. Urol.1986; 136: 256. Link, Google Scholar 26 : The patient with exstrophy in adult life. Brit. J. Urol.1983; 55: 632. Google Scholar 27 : Genital function in males with vesical exstrophy and epispadias. Brit. J. Urol.1972; 44: 169. Google Scholar 28 : The sexual and reproductive consequences of congenital genitourinary anomalies. J. Urol., part 21994; 152: 645. Abstract, Google Scholar 29 : Long-term followup after exstrophy closure: late improvement and good quality of life. J. Urol.1978; 119: 664. Link, Google Scholar Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland© 1997 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byHarris T, Manyevitch R, Wu W, Leto Barone A, Bivalacqua T, Burnett A, Gearhart J and Redett R (2020) Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty for Penile Reconstruction in Patients With Bladder ExstrophyJournal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 3, (880-887), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021.Benz K, Dunn E, Solaiyappan M, Maruf M, Kasprenski M, Jayman J, Michaud J, Facciola J, DiCarlo H and Gearhart J (2018) Novel Observations of Female Genital Anatomy in Classic Bladder Exstrophy Using 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ReconstructionJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 4, (882-889), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.Perovic S and Djinovic R (2007) New Insight Into Surgical Anatomy of Epispadiac Penis and its Impact on RepairJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 2, (689-696), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008.VanderBrink B, Stock J and Hanna M (2007) Esthetic Outcomes of Genitoplasty in Males Born With Bladder Exstrophy and EpispadiasJournal of Urology, VOL. 178, NO. 4S, (1606-1610), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2007.GEARHART J and BAIRD A (2018) THE FAILED COMPLETE REPAIR OF BLADDER EXSTROPHY: INSIGHTS AND OUTCOMESJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 4 Part 2, (1669-1673), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005.HUSMANN D and GEARHART J (2018) LOSS OF THE PENILE GLANS AND/OR CORPORA FOLLOWING PRIMARY REPAIR OF BLADDER EXSTROPHY USING THE COMPLETE PENILE DISASSEMBLY TECHNIQUEJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 4 Part 2, (1696-1701), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2004.HALACHMI S, FARHAT W, KONEN O, KHAN A, HODAPP J, BAGLI D, McLORIE G and KHOURY A (2018) Pelvic Floor Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Neonatal Single Stage Reconstruction in Male Patients With Classic Bladder ExstrophyJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 4 Part 2, (1505-1509), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.STEC A, PANNU H, TADROS Y, SPONSELLER P, FISHMAN E and GEARHART J (2018) PELVIC FLOOR ANATOMY IN CLASSIC BLADDER EXSTROPHY USING 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY: INITIAL INSIGHTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 4, (1444-1449), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2001.DE FONTAINE S, LORÉA P, WESPES E, SCHULMAN C and GOLDSCHMIDT D (2018) COMPLETE PHALLOPLASTY USING THE FREE RADIAL FOREARM FLAP FOR CORRECTING MICROPENIS ASSOCIATED WITH VESICAL EXSTROPHYJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 2, (597-599), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2001.WOODHOUSE C (2018) PROSPECTS FOR FERTILITY IN PATIENTS BORN WITH GENITOURINARY ANOMALIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 6 Part 2, (2354-2360), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.HAFEZ A, ELSHERBINY M and GHONEIM M (2018) COMPLETE REPAIR OF BLADDER EXSTROPHY: PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE WITH NEONATES AND CHILDREN WITH FAILED INITIAL CLOSUREJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 6 Part 2, (2428-2430), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.STEIN R, JÜNGER T, ANDERS M, FISCH M, KERSCHBAUMER F, HOWALDT H and HOHENFELLNER R (2018) THE GIESSEN-MAINZ-FRANKFURT PROCEDURE: A NEW METHOD FOR COMPLEX PELVIC RECONSTRUCTION FOR BLADDER EXSTROPHYJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 4, (1235-1239), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.SURER I, BAKER L, JEFFS R and GEARHART J (2018) THE MODIFIED CANTWELL-RANSLEY REPAIR FOR EXSTROPHY AND EPISPADIAS: 10-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 3 Part 2, (1040-1043), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.STJERNQVIST K and KOCKUM C (2018) BLADDER EXSTROPHY: PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT DURING CHILDHOODJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 6, (2125-2129), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999.Gearhart J (2018) EDITORIAL: THE EXSTROPHY-EPISPADIAS COMPLEX IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM-SCIENCE, PRACTICE AND POLICYJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 4, (1421-1423), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.Gearhart J (2018) EDITORIAL: EVOLUTION OF EPISPADIAS REPAIR-TIMING, TECHNIQUES AND RESULTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 1, (177-178), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998. Volume 157Issue 3March 1997Page: 999-1003 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1997 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Richard I. Silver More articles by this author Andrew Yang More articles by this author Jacob Ben-Chaim More articles by this author Robert D. Jeffs More articles by this author John P. Gearhart More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...