The prevalence of hypertension is higher in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with those without. This retrospective analysis of a large cohort of children and adolescents with T1D from the SWEET (Better control in Pediatric and Adolescent diabeteS: Working to crEate CEnTers of Reference) international consortium of pediatric diabetes centers aimed to 1) estimate the prevalence of elevated office blood pressure (BP) and hypertension and 2) investigate the influence of BP measurement methodology on the prevalence of hypertension.A total of 27,120 individuals with T1D, aged 5-18 years, were analyzed. Participants were grouped into those with BP measurements at three or more visits (n = 10,440) and fewer than 3 visits (n = 16,680) per year and stratified by age and sex. A subgroup analysis was performed on 15,742 individuals from centers providing a score indicating BP measurement accuracy.Among participants with BP measurement at three or more visits, the prevalence of hypertension was lower compared with those with fewer than three visits (10.8% vs. 17.5% P < 0.001), whereas elevated BP and normotension were higher (17.5% and 71.7% vs. 15.3% and 67.1%, respectively; both P < 0.001). The prevalence of hypertension and elevated BP was higher in individuals aged ≥13 years than in younger ones (P < 0.001) and in male than female participants (P < 0.001). In linear regression models, systolic and diastolic BP was independently determined by the BP measurement methodology.The estimated prevalence of elevated BP and hypertension in children and adolescents with T1D is ∼30% and depends on the BP measurement methodology. Less frequent BP evaluation may overestimate the prevalence of hypertension.
Background The increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in India underscores the pressing need for effective management strategies. Meeting the American Diabetes Association (ADA) ABC targets for diabetes (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, and serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)) is crucial for effectively managing T2D, as it reflects the optimal control of key metabolic parameters. Insulin resistance (IR) and impaired beta cell function (BCF) have been found to have a significant impact on glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and hypertension, contributing to the complex cardiovascular risk profile of patients with T2D. This study aimed to explore the association between ABC targets for diabetes, IR, BCF, and dyslipidemia in a cross-sectional cohort of T2D patients. Methods This retrospective study examined data from 681 T2D patients with comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia. The patients were part of a one-year online lifestyle intervention program for diabetes management at the Freedom from Diabetes Clinic in Pune, India, between January 2021 and December 2022. Baseline data (at the time of enrollment in the program) on medical history and anthropometric and biochemical parameters were retrospectively extracted from medical records and used to assess ABC targets and other clinical parameters. The ABC targets for diabetes include three goals: an HbA1c level of less than 7.0%, a blood pressure level of less than 140/90 mmHg, and an LDL-C level of less than 100 mg/dL. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B), and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) were calculated using standard formulas. Results Cross-sectional analysis at baseline showed that 152 (22.3%) participants met all three ABC targets, 306 (45.0%) and 183 (26.8%) participants met two or one targets, respectively, and 40 (5.9%) did not meet any of the ABC targets. Participants meeting all three targets showed significantly lower IR, higher sensitivity (HOMA-IR, median 2.1; QUICKI, median 0.34), higher BCF (HOMA-B, median 62.9), and healthier lipid profiles (mg/dL) (total cholesterol, median 126; triglycerides, median 114; and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL), median 84) than those who did not meet any of the ABC targets (HOMA-IR, median 3.4; QUICKI, median 0.31; HOMA-B, median 31.7; total cholesterol, median 221; triglycerides, median 187; and non-HDL, median 182) (p < 0.01). A significant association was observed between lower BMI (< 25 kg/m
Basal insulin combined oral therapy consisting of insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) is recommended for type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on OADs. There is a lack of clear evidence and recommendations on the combined use of basal insulin analogues to more than one OADs (glimepiride plus metformin) in effective control of glycemic parameters and its safety in terms of reduced hypoglycemic events, weight gain and cardiovascular risk. In this context, a group of clinical experts discussed the utility of basal insulin combined oral therapy with metformin and glimepiride in the current era.The clinical experts discussed and provided their inputs virtually. The expert panel included clinical experts comprising endocrinologists and diabetologists from India and Nepal.The panel thoroughly reviewed existing literature on the subject and proposed clinical evidence and practice-based guidelines.These current clinical practice guidelines highlight the efficacy and safety of basal insulin combination therapy with various available basal insulins including neutral protamine hagedorn, detemir, glargine and degludec in addition to metformin and glimepiride therapy.
This communication discusses Gandhian thought, i.e, the philosophy propounded by Mahatma Gandhi, and its relevance to modern diabetes care.The authors call for a 'righteous movement' against diabetes, including individual and community-based efforts to minimize its impact.They list various useful suggestions which are concordant with Gandhian thought, and suggest interventions which the Mahatma would have supported in the fi ght against diabetes.
Diabetes presents a significant public health challenge globally, with India emerging as a hotspot for the disease burden. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Diabetes Atlas 2021 highlights India with 1 in 7 adults affected with diabetes. Given the heightened susceptibility of individuals with diabetes to vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccination has become indispensable in comprehensive diabetes management. Major vaccines against influenza, pneumonia, hepatitis, shingles, varicella, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis infections are important for individuals living with diabetes. Despite strides in pediatric vaccination coverage through initiatives like the Universal Immunization Program (UIP), adult vaccination rates remain suboptimal in India. Vaccine hesitancy, compounded by factors such as inadequate education, affordability concerns, and accessibility issues, disproportionately affects this population. Even though there are multiple organizations recommending vaccination in adults, guidelines specific to the Indian population with diabetes are still lacking. This paper is an attempt to suggest the use of vaccines for people with diabetes in India. By advocating for increased awareness and accessibility to vaccines, healthcare providers can play a pivotal role in safeguarding the health of this vulnerable population. As the global community continues to combat diabetes and vaccine hesitancy, collaborative efforts are essential to ensure equitable access to life-saving vaccines and promote optimal health outcomes. This review examines the evolving landscape of vaccination in India, particularly focusing on adults with diabetes.