We aimed to compare the performance of the recent CASTLE score to J-CTO, CL and PROGRESS CTO scores in a comprehensive database of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion procedures.Scores were calculated using raw data from 1,342 chronic total occlusion procedures included in REBECO Registry that includes learning and expert operators. Calibration, discrimination and reclassification were evaluated and compared.Mean score values were: CASTLE 1.60±1.10, J-CTO 2.15±1.24, PROGRESS 1.68±0.94 and CL 2.52±1.52 points. The overall percutaneous coronary intervention success rate was 77.8%. Calibration was good for CASTLE and CL, but not for J-CTO or PROGRESS scores. Discrimination: the area under the curve (AUC) of CASTLE (0.633) was significantly higher than PROGRESS (0.557) and similar to J-CTO (0.628) and CL (0.652). Reclassification: CASTLE, as assessed by integrated discrimination improvement, was superior to PROGRESS (integrated discrimination improvement +0.036, p<0.001), similar to J-CTO and slightly inferior to CL score (- 0.011, p = 0.004). Regarding net reclassification improvement, CASTLE reclassified better than PROGRESS (overall continuous net reclassification improvement 0.379, p<0.001) in roughly 20% of cases.Procedural percutaneous coronary intervention difficulty is not consistently depicted by available chronic total occlusion scores and is influenced by the characteristics of each chronic total occlusion cohort. In our study population, including expert and learning operators, the CASTLE score had slightly better overall performance along with CL score. However, we found only intermediate performance in the c-statistic predicting chronic total occlusion success among all scores.
Abstract Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is projected to become the third cause of mortality worldwide. COPD shares several pathophysiological mechanisms with cardiovascular disease, especially atherosclerosis. However, no definite answers are available on the prognostic role of COPD in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially during COVID-19 pandemic, among patients undergoing primary angioplasty, that is therefore the aim of the current study. Methods In the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 registry we included retrospectively patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March and June of 2019 and 2020 from 109 high-volume primary PCI centers in 4 continents. Results A total of 15,686 patients were included in this analysis. Of them, 810 (5.2%) subjects had a COPD diagnosis. They were more often elderly and with a more pronounced cardiovascular risk profile. No preminent procedural dissimilarities were noticed except for a lower proportion of dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge among COPD patients (98.9% vs. 98.1%, P = 0.038). With regards to short-term fatal outcomes, both in-hospital and 30-days mortality occurred more frequently among COPD patients, similarly in pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. However, after adjustment for main baseline differences, COPD did not result as independent predictor for in-hospital death (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.913[0.658–1.266], P = 0.585) nor for 30-days mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.850 [0.620–1.164], P = 0.310). No significant differences were detected in terms of SARS-CoV-2 positivity between the two groups. Conclusion This is one of the largest studies investigating characteristics and outcome of COPD patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, especially during COVID pandemic. COPD was associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital and 30-days mortality. However, this association disappeared after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Furthermore, COPD did not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Trial registration number: NCT 04412655 (2nd June 2020).
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Intermediate-high risk (IHR) Pulmonary Embolism (PE) are a common disease witch could have a high mortality. Anticoagulation remains the first therapeutic option, but Catheter-directed therapies are being investigated as a safe and effective treatment option. PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Catheter-directed low-dose fibrinolysis infusion to treat IHR-PE. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 16 patients IHR-PE treated. After performing Right catheterization (RC) and angiogram, Pigtail catheters were located for intrapulmonary infusion of Alteplase 1mg/h/catheter for 24 h (25-30mg/day). Baseline and clinical characteristics, inicial and evolutive echocardiography, also clinical evaluation and echocardiography 6 months after discharge were evaluated. RESULTS The majority were women (11) and obese (93.8%), aged 22-74 years with cardiovascular risk factors: 5 hypertension, 3 Dyslipidemia, 2 smokers and 3 severe CKD . At admission 11 patients consulted for dyspnea and 5 for syncope; all were hemodynamic stable. 68.8% presented respiratory failure. All had bilateral PE (angiography) and elevation of Nt-proBNP and troponins. The echocardiographic at admission, and its evolution are shown in Table 1. The invasive measurement of pulmonary hypertension (PH) reflected greater severity than the estimated by echo: 5 (31.3%) Severe PH, 5 (31.3%) Moderate PH and 2 (12.5%) mild PH. At discharge all presented a decrease in PH and 15 (93.8%) improved RV function. 2 patients suffered bleeding complications (relation with femoral access): 1 not severe, 1 severe without mortality; none suffered intracranial hemorrhage. In the evaluation at 6-months: 13 patients (81.3%) where on functional Class I and without PH, 3 patients (18.8%) where in Class II and with mild-PH. CONCLUSION In short-term follow-up, intrapulmonary low-dose fibrinolysis reduces PA pressures and improves RV function, without an increased bleeding complications, especially if femoral access is avoided. However impact on long-term remains unclear. Table 1: Echocardiography evolution.RV function admissionNormal Function1 (6.3%)Mild Dysfunction9 (56.3%)Moderate Dysfunction6 (37.5%)RV Dilatation admissionDilatation 16 (100%)Not dilatation 0 (0%)PH Degree admissionMild PH6 (37.5%)Moderate PH5 (31.3%)Severe PH5 (31.3%)PH Degree 24h-postNot PH1 (6.3%)Mild PH10 (62.5%)Moderate/severe PH5 (31.3%)Improvement RV 24h-postYes14 (87.5%)Not2 (12.5%)RV function dischargeNormal Function16 (100%)Mild Dysfunction0 (0%)Moderate Dysfunction0 (0%)RV Dilatation dischargeDilatation 5 (31.3%)Not dilatation 11 (68.8%)PH Degree dischargeNot PH 9 (56.3%)Mild PH7 (43.8%)Moderate/severe PH0 (0%)RV Right Ventricular; PH: Pulmonary Hypertension,