To examine whether co-administration of intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) with antibiotics early in life may have a preventive role against metabolic syndrome (MetS) in mice.A total of 50 mice were allocated to four treatment groups after weaning. Mice were treated with azithromycin (AZT) ± IAP, or with no AZT ± IAP, for three intermittent 7-day cycles. After the last treatment course, the mice were administered a regular chow diet for 5 weeks and subsequently a high-fat diet for 5 weeks. Body weight, food intake, water intake, serum lipids, glucose levels and liver lipids were compared. 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing was used to determine the differences in microbiome composition.Exposure to AZT early in life rendered mice susceptible to MetS in adulthood. Co-administration of IAP with AZT completely prevented this susceptibility by decreasing total body weight, serum lipids, glucose levels and liver lipids to the levels of control mice. These effects of IAP probably occur as a result of changes in the composition of specific bacterial taxa at the genus and species levels (e.g. members of Anaeroplasma and Parabacteroides).Co-administration of IAP with AZT early in life prevents mice from susceptibility to the later development of MetS. This effect is associated with alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota. IAP may represent a novel treatment against MetS in humans.
There are few major adverse events after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. However, increasing cases of myocarditis and pericarditis are being reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in young people, primarily after the second dose of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines. We present a case series of myopericarditis post mRNA (Moderna) and myocarditis post vector-based (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccines. We intend to highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of vaccine-related myocarditis to reduce mortality and morbidity.
Abstract Background The 2022–2023 United States influenza season had unusually early influenza activity with high hospitalization rates. Vaccine-matched A(H3N2) viruses predominated, with lower levels of A(H1N1)pdm09 activity also observed. Methods Using the test-negative design, we evaluated influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) during the 2022–2023 season against influenza A–associated emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits and hospitalizations from October 2022 to March 2023 among adults (aged ≥18 years) with acute respiratory illness (ARI). VE was estimated by comparing odds of seasonal influenza vaccination among case-patients (influenza A test positive by molecular assay) and controls (influenza test negative), applying inverse-propensity-to-be-vaccinated weights. Results The analysis included 85 389 ED/UC ARI encounters (17.0% influenza A positive; 37.8% vaccinated overall) and 19 751 hospitalizations (9.5% influenza A positive; 52.8% vaccinated overall). VE against influenza A–associated ED/UC encounters was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40%–47%) overall and 45% and 41% among adults aged 18–64 and ≥65 years, respectively. VE against influenza A–associated hospitalizations was 35% (95% CI, 27%–43%) overall and 23% and 41% among adults aged 18–64 and ≥65 years, respectively. Conclusions VE was moderate during the 2022–2023 influenza season, a season characterized with increased burden of influenza and co-circulation with other respiratory viruses. Vaccination is likely to substantially reduce morbidity, mortality, and strain on healthcare resources.
Metabolic syndrome comprises a cluster of related disorders that includes obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and fatty liver. Recently, gut-derived chronic endotoxemia has been identified as a primary mediator for triggering the low-grade inflammation responsible for the development of metabolic syndrome. In the present study we examined the role of the small intestinal brush-border enzyme, intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), in preventing a high-fat-diet-induced metabolic syndrome in mice. We found that both endogenous and orally supplemented IAP inhibits absorption of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharides) that occurs with dietary fat, and oral IAP supplementation prevents as well as reverses metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, IAP supplementation improves the lipid profile in mice fed a standard, low-fat chow diet. These results point to a potentially unique therapy against metabolic syndrome in at-risk humans.
Despite rising interest in integrating the patient voice in value-based payment (VBP) models for oncology, barriers persist to implementing patient-reported measures (PRMs), including patient-reported performance measures (PR-PMs). This article describes the landscape of oncology PRMs and PR-PMs, identifies implementation barriers, and recommends solutions for public and private payers to accelerate the appropriate use of PRMs in oncology VBP programs. Our research used a multimethod approach that included a literature review, landscape scan, stakeholder interviews and survey, and a multistakeholder roundtable. The literature review and landscape scan found that limited oncology-specific PR-PMs are available and some are already used in VBP programs. Diverse stakeholder perspectives provided insight into filling current gaps in measurement and removing implementation barriers, such as limited relevance of existing PRMs and PR-PMs for oncology; methodological challenges; patient burden and survey fatigue; and provider burden from resource constraints, competing priorities, and insufficient incentives. Key recommendations include: (a) identify or develop meaningful measures that fill gaps, engaging patients throughout measure and program development and evaluation; (b) design programs that include scientifically sound measures standardized to reduce patient and provider burden while supporting care; and (c) engage providers using a stepwise approach that offers resources and incentives to support implementation. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this project was provided by the National Pharmaceutical Council. Schmidt, Perkins, Riposo, and Patel are employees of Discern Health, a consulting firm with many clients, including government, life sciences, nonprofit, and provider organizations. Valuck is a partner at Discern Health. Westrich is an employee of the National Pharmaceutical Council, an industry-funded health policy research group that is not involved in lobbying or advocacy. Basch reports grants from National Cancer Institute and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; fees from serving as a consultant on research projects at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Research Triangle Institute/CMS; and fees from serving as a scientific advisor to CareVive Systems, Sivan Healthcare, Navigating Cancer, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. McClellan reports fees from serving on the boards of Johnson & Johnson and Seer Bio and as an advisor to Cota outside the submitted work; and McClellan is an independent board member on the boards of Cigna and Alignment Healthcare, co-chair of the Guiding Committee for the Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network, and receives fees for serving as an advisor for MITRE, outside the submitted work.
The Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was first identified in the United States in November 2021, with the BA.1 sublineage (including BA.1.1) causing the largest surge in COVID-19 cases to date. Omicron sublineages BA.2 and BA.2.12.1 emerged later and by late April 2022, accounted for most cases.* Estimates of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) can be reduced by newly emerging variants or sublineages that evade vaccine-induced immunity (1), protection from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated persons (2), or increasing time since vaccination (3). Real-world data comparing VE during the periods when the BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 predominated (BA.1 period and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 period, respectively) are limited. The VISION network† examined 214,487 emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits and 58,782 hospitalizations with a COVID-19-like illness§ diagnosis among 10 states during December 18, 2021-June 10, 2022, to evaluate VE of 2, 3, and 4 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) compared with no vaccination among adults without immunocompromising conditions. VE against COVID-19-associated hospitalization 7-119 days and ≥120 days after receipt of dose 3 was 92% (95% CI = 91%-93%) and 85% (95% CI = 81%-89%), respectively, during the BA.1 period, compared with 69% (95% CI = 58%-76%) and 52% (95% CI = 44%-59%), respectively, during the BA.2/BA.2.12.1 period. Patterns were similar for ED/UC encounters. Among adults aged ≥50 years, VE against COVID-19-associated hospitalization ≥120 days after receipt of dose 3 was 55% (95% CI = 46%-62%) and ≥7 days (median = 27 days) after a fourth dose was 80% (95% CI = 71%-85%) during BA.2/BA.2.12.1 predominance. Immunocompetent persons should receive recommended COVID-19 booster doses to prevent moderate to severe COVID-19, including a first booster dose for all eligible persons and second booster dose for adults aged ≥50 years at least 4 months after an initial booster dose. Booster doses should be obtained immediately when persons become eligible.¶.
During June-October 2022, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 sublineage accounted for most of the sequenced viral genomes in the United States, with further Omicron sublineage diversification through November 2022.* Bivalent mRNA vaccines contain an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain component plus an updated component of the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages. On September 1, 2022, a single bivalent booster dose was recommended for adults who had completed a primary vaccination series (with or without subsequent booster doses), with the last dose administered ≥2 months earlier (1). During September 13-November 18, the VISION Network evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a bivalent mRNA booster dose (after 2, 3, or 4 monovalent doses) compared with 1) no previous vaccination and 2) previous receipt of 2, 3, or 4 monovalent-only mRNA vaccine doses, among immunocompetent adults aged ≥18 years with an emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) encounter or hospitalization for a COVID-19-like illness.
Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic continually challenges the scientific community to develop and evaluate viable treatments. In May 2020, remdesivir became the first medication to receive emergency use authorization for the treatment of COVID-19, while dexamethasone became standard of care for patients requiring supplementary oxygen in late 2020. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of hospitalized adult patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted in the first wave (3/2020-7/2020) and second wave (10/2020-1/2021) at Cook County Hospital. Variables on demographic, clinical data and outcomes were extracted from the EMR. The measured intervention was use of dexamethasone with remdesivir during the second wave; patients were matched by age and diabetic status to patients in the first wave who had received only remdesivir. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were ICU admission and intubation. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between use of dexamethasone and each outcome, controlling for glucose levels, use of remdesivir and severity of disease. Results 621 patients were admitted in the first wave (3/2020-7/2020) versus 355 in the second wave (12/2020-1/2021). Median age was 55 years and 56 years, respectively. Most patients were Hispanic and Black. In the first wave, 296 patients (48%) were admitted with severe COVID-19 (defined as oxygen saturation on room air at or below 94%) versus 163 patients (46%) in the second wave. Logistic regression showed no association between use of dexamethasone and ICU admission, mortality or intubation. Use of remdesivir showed no association with any of the outcomes. Glucose and severe/critical disease were strongly associated with ICU admission (p=0.01 and p=0.003) and mortality (p=0.06 for both). Conclusion Despite promising medications, in this study the mortality and disease severity of COVID-19 was very similar to that seen in the first wave. This could be due to patients presenting with more advanced disease and undiagnosed or poorly-controlled comorbidities that may offset the potential benefit of these treatments. Enhancing access to care and decreasing health inequalities may be more worthwhile than finding a “miracle drug”. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.
