Purpose A phase III study to determine whether a weekly docetaxel schedule improves the therapeutic index compared with the classic 3-weekly schedule. Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB-IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (3-weekly) and 35 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 (weekly) for ≤ eight cycles. End points included survival (primary), toxicity, and response. Results Of 215 patients enrolled, 208 (103 in the 3-weekly arm and 105 in the weekly arm) were assessable for response. At baseline, 24.5% of patients (51 out of 208) had received prior paclitaxel therapy and 43.3% of patients (90 out of 208) had been progression-free for more than 3 months after first-line therapy. After 12 months' follow-up, median survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.68 to 7.84 months) with 3-weekly docetaxel and 9.2 months (95% CI, 5.83 to 12.59 months) with weekly docetaxel (P = .07) after a median of four (range, one to eight) and two (range, one to eight) treatment cycles, respectively. Overall, response rates were 12.6% v 10.5% with 3-weekly versus weekly docetaxel. Significantly fewer patients reported grade 3 to 4 toxicities with weekly docetaxel versus 3-weekly docetaxel (P ≤ .05). There were significantly lower rates of grade 3 to 4 anemia (P ≤ .05), leucopenia (P < .0001), and neutropenia (P ≤ .001) with weekly versus 3-weekly treatment. No grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia or mucositis was reported. Conclusion Weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m 2 demonstrated similar efficacy and better tolerability than standard 3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 and can be recommended as a feasible alternative second-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.
Our aim was to explore the impact of the HER2/neu, HER3 receptor as well as their ligands' neuregulin (NRG1) expression on the outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). NRG1, HER2/neu and HER3 expression was evaluated in 208 patients with mCRC receiving 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as the first-line treatment. Biomarker expression was correlated with the outcome of patients. NRG1 (low: 192 vs. high: 16), HER2/neu (low: 201 vs. high: 7) and HER3 (low: 69 vs. high: 139) expressions were assessed in 208 patients. High versus low NRG1 expression significantly affected progression-free survival (PFS) [4.7 vs. 8.2 months, hazard ratio (HR): 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45–4.13; P=0.001], but not overall survival (OS) (15.5 vs. 20.7 months, HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.76–2.35; P=0.32). High versus low HER3 expression (PFS: 7.1 vs. 8.8 months, HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82–1.50; P=0.50; OS: 19.8 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.70–1.30; P=0.75) and high compared with low HER2/neu expression (PFS: 7.7 vs. 8.0 months, HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.71–1.60; P=0.75; OS: 16.6 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.75–1.71; P=0.57) did not influence outcome. High NRG1 expression was associated with inferior PFS in the FIRE-1 trial. We did not detect a prognostic impact of HER2/neu and HER3 overexpression in mCRC. The frequency of overexpression was comparable with other studies.
445 Background: The FIRE-3 study (AIO KRK-0306) was designed as a randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (cet) to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment in KRAS WT mCRC patients. FOLFIRI plus cet as first-line treatment of KRAS WT mCRC patients resulted in comparable overall response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) when compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the FOLFIRI plus cet arm. Methods: In a preplanned analysis, the effect of mutations within the EGFR dependent pathway were investigated. Next to mutations within KRAS (exon 2, 3, 4), NRAS (exon 2, 3, 4) and BRAF (V600E), mutations within PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20) and Akt were investigated and their impact on ORR, PFS and OS within the FIRE-3 population was evaluated. The analysis of all mutations was carried out employing pyrosequencing. Results: The ITT population consisted of 592 KRAS WT (exon 2) patients. The current analysis includes 488 cases (82.4%) with tumor tissue available. In 407 pts sequencing of all RAS mutations was possible. The ORR within the WT RAS patient group was higher in the FOLFIRI plus cet arm (65.5% vs 59.6%; Fisher´s p: 0.157). HRs (cet; bev) for pts with WT RASwere 0.93 (95% CI, 0.74-1.17; p = 0.54) for PFS and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.53-0.92; p = 0.01) for OS. PIK3CA mutation did not influence PFS nor OS when compared to the RAS wt population. Conclusions: ORR and OS were increased in patients with cet plus FOLFIRI as compared to bev plus FOLFIRI in patients without RAS mutations. Exclusion of patients with RAS mutations identifies a population which is more likely to benefit from cetuximab. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927.
3519^ Background: We investigated the expression of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) as well as the amplification of the EGFR-gene in tumor specimens of mCRC patients (pts) treated first-line with anti-EGFR targeted cetuximab together with CAPOX or CAPIRI. Expression levels were correlated with overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to determine their relationship with effectiveness in this setting. Methods: A total of 185 mCRC pts were randomized to cetuximab (400mg/m² day 1, followed by 250mg/m² weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200mg/m², day 1; capecitabine 800mg/m² twice daily days 1-14, every 3 weeks; 20% dose reduction of both agents for pts older than 65 years) or plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130mg/m² day 1; capecitabine 1000mg/m² twice daily days 1-14, every three weeks). The primary study endpoint was ORR. KRAS mutational status did not correlate with treatment outcome. The cut-offs for EGFR-amplification using FISH, AREG and EREG levels determined by RT-qPCR were calculated using ROC analysis for ORR. Results: Within the subgroup of KRAS wildtype tumors, analysis of EREG- and AREG-expression was possible in 99 pts and of EGFR-amplification in 63 pts. Higher AREG levels correlated significantly with higher ORR (83% vs 46%, p=0.006, OR 0.31), longer PFS (9.6mo vs 4.9, p<0.001, HR 0.35) and longer OS (39.9mo vs 17.2mo, p<0.001, HR 0.36). Higher EREG levels showed a significant correlation with ORR (74% vs 47%, p=0.036, OR 0.54), longer PFS (7.9mo vs 4.9mo, p=0.026, HR 0.57) and OS (33.0mo vs 20.2mo, p=0.041, HR 0.57). EGFR-amplification correlated significantly with higher ORR (71% vs 33%, p=0.004, OR 0.49), longer PFS (8.4mo vs 4.6mo, p=0.004, HR 0.50) and longer OS (30.5mo vs 15.2mo, p=0.001, HR 0.44). Conclusions: In the treatment setting of cetuximab combined with CAIPIRI or CAPOX, AREG, EREG and EGFR-amplification predicted treatment efficacy. Within the subgroup of pts with KRAS wildtype tumors, EGFR-FISH and AREG expression have the strongest relationship with treatment efficacy.
12 Background: 10-20% of GC overexpress HER2, a membrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) which belongs to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family. Drugs directed against HER2 have shown mixed success in the treatment of advanced GC. While trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody addressing HER2 has been approved for 1 st -line treatment of stage IV HER2+ GC, trastuzumab-emtansine failed to improve outcomes in 2 nd -line and lapatinib, a small molecular RTK inhibitor of HER2 and EGFR was not effective in 1 st - and 2 nd -line. Until now, primary and secondary resistance against HER2-directed treatment of GC is not well understood. The VARIANZ study aims to assess mechanisms influencing efficacy of trastuzumab in HER2+ GC. Methods: In this multicenter study, patients who receive medical treatment for advanced GC are recruited in 31 sites. The HER2 status is verified centrally by two dedicated GI pathologists using immunohistochemistry (IHC, DCS, HI608C0I) and chromogenic-in-situ hybridization (CISH, Zytomed Systems, C-3022-40). Results: From May 2014 to August 2016, we have enrolled 316 patients in this ongoing project (72% male, median age 64 years). At present, 281 samples were fully characterized for the HER2 status. According to criteria from the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) study, 53 of 281 samples were characterized HER2+ by central testing. In 38 samples that were diagnosed as HER2+ by local pathologists the HER2 status could not be verified centrally. 7 HER2- probes in local testing were characterized as HER2+ by central testing. The overall deviation rate between local and central testing is 27%. HER2 gene amplification in HER2+ tumors with deviating local report (mean HER2/CEP17: 2.8 ± 0.9, range between 1.9 and 4.5) is lower compared to HER2+ tumors and confirmed local report (mean HER2/CEP17: 5.5 ± 2.6; range between 2.2 and 11.0; p = 0.014). Conclusions: HER2-expression in GC is heterogeneous and still not easy to assess. Variability between local and central HER2 assessment is significant. Robust biomarkers predicting response or resistance to HER2 and other target therapies are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02305043.
The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) combines serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin and was shown to predict survival in advanced cancer. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of mGPS on survival as well as its predictive value when combined with gender in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial.
