<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens.</p>Patients and Methods:<p>Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS).</p>Results:<p>One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (<i>n</i> = 48) or arm B (<i>n</i> = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%–69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%–68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; <i>P</i> = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (<i>P</i> = 0.02).</p>Conclusions:<p>The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.</p></div>
Abstract Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an aggressive CD30+ T-Cell lymphoma that accounts for 2-8% and 10-15% non-Hodgkin lymphomas in adults and children, respectively. The currently used standard therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK, a member of insulin receptor superfamily) positive ALCL has limited effectiveness, resulting in a substantial percentage of cases with poor outcome, either failing to enter remission or relapsing within a few months after starting the treatment. Thus, there is a clear unmet clinical need for developing novel, effective and safer therapeutic strategies for ALCL. Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) is a nucleolar phosphoprotein, which functions as a molecular chaperone for proteins and nucleic acids. Approximately 50% of ALCL cases are positive for the NPM-ALK fusion chimera generated by the t(2;5) chromosomal translocation. The oligomerization domain of NPM1 in the fusion protein NPM-ALK, mediates the ligand-independent dimerization of chimeric protein, which results in constitutive activation of the chimeric tyrosine kinase activity leading to downstream signaling pathways responsible for the oncogenicity. Ceritinib is a second generation FDA approved ALK inhibitor for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Here we report the first preclinical evaluation of ceritinib growth inhibitory effects on ALK-positive ALCL cells. The NPM-ALK expressing ALCL model cell line SUDHL-1 used in our studies. Treatment with ceritinib significantly induced apoptosis dose dependently (10-50nM) in ALCL cells associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage. Mechanistically, ceritinib blocked phosphorylation of ALK and its downstream signaling effectors STAT3, AKT and ERK1/2. Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry showed that ceritinib induced G0/G1 arrest with concomitant decrease in the percentage of cells in S and G2/M phases which was associated with decreased cyclin D1 and increased p21 expression. ALCL is also characterized by strong expression of the cytokine receptor CD30 (a member of the TNF receptor family). CD30 stimulation leads to NF-kB activation and the induction of anti-apoptotic mechanisms. In response to ceritinib treatment, flow cytometry data showed that reduced CD30 expression in a dose dependent manner. Altogether, these pre-clinical results demonstrate that ceritinib induces apoptosis in ALCL cells by inhibiting ALK downstream signaling cascade and support the rational for in vivo testing of ceritinib for the treatment of ALK positive lymphomas. Citation Format: Siddhartha Ganguly, Sudhakiranmayi Kuravi, Satyanarayana Alleboina, Brandon Weckbaugh, Deepti Satelli, Jensen Roy, Scott Weir, Joseph McGuirk, Ramesh Balusu. Pre-clinical evaluation of ceritinib in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 776. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-776
Abstract Introduction: The TNBC-DX risk score includes the 14-gene immunoglobulin (IGG) immune signature, tumor size, and nodal status and has shown prognostic value for survival in early-stage TNBC (B. Conte et al., ESMO Breast 2021). However, currently unknown are the value of the TNBC-DX risk score and IGG immune signature in 1) predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy, and 2) predicting outcomes the context of neoadjuvant anti-PD1 treatment. Here, we assessed the IGG signature and the TNBC-DX risk score in patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NeoPACT; NCT03639948) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy without immunotherapy (NeoSTOP; NCT02413320). Methods: NeoPACT trial enrolled 120 patients with stage I-III TNBC who received carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2) + pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days x 6 cycles. NeoSTOP randomized 100 patients with stage I-III TNBC to two chemotherapy regimens; Arm B of NeoSTOP was included in this correlative study as the chemotherapy regimen was identical to NeoPACT. RNA isolated from pretreatment tumor tissue was subjected to next-generation sequencing. The 14-gene IGG immune signature and TNBC-DX risk score were calculated in silico as previously described. Evaluation of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) was performed as previously described. Markers were tested for prediction of pCR. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effect of multiple variables. Event-free survival (EFS) curves were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and groups compared by the log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results: In this analysis, 112 patients were treated with chemoimmunotherapy on NeoPACT (node-positive = 38%, pCR rate = 58%). In the NeoPACT trial, the 14-gene IGG signature (as a continuous variable) was significantly associated with improved pCR (odds ratio [OR]=1.105, 95% CI 1.019-1.197, P=0.015 for every 0.2 increment). The pCR rates in IGG-high (≥ median) and IGG-low (< median) groups were 71% and 44%, respectively (OR=3.152, 95% CI 1.420-6.996, P=0.005). In terms of EFS, the 14-gene IGG signature was not prognostic (hazard ratio [HR]=0.507, 95% CI 0.148-1.735, p=0.269). In contrast, TNBC-DX risk score was strongly associated with EFS (HR=5.684, 95% CI 1.226-26.356, P=0.012), even when adjusted for sTILs and pCR status (HR=8.415, 95% CI 1.054-67.169, P=0.044). Estimated 3-year EFS rates in TNBC-DX high and low risk groups (above and below median) were 77% and 89%, respectively (P=0.012). In 43 NeoSTOP patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (node-positive = 33%, pCR rate = 53%), no association of IGG signature with pCR or TNBC-DX score with EFS was observed. Finally, we observed a moderate correlation between IGG signature and sTILs in both trial datasets combined (r=0.642, P< 0.001). Conclusions: High expression of the 14-gene IGG immune signature in baseline pretreatment tumor samples in early-stage TNBC is significantly associated with pCR following pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of this signature with tumor burden as assessed by TNBC-DX is prognostic for long-term outcomes. Availability of biomarkers that can predict both pathological response and survival with chemoimmunotherapy can optimize this therapy, and evaluation of this biomarker in larger studies is warranted. Citation Format: Priyanka Sharma, Shane R. Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Joshua M. Staley, Roberto Salgado, Laia Paré, Benedetta Conte, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Anne O’Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Qamar Khan, Andrew K. Godwin, Aleix Prat. PD11-07 Association of TNBC-DX scores with outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy: a correlative analysis from NeoPACT and NeoSTOP trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-07.
513 Background: Addition of pembrolizumab to anthracycline-taxane-platinum chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR) and event free survival (EFS) in TNBC. Aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the anthracycline free neoadjuvant regimen of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus docetaxel (Cb+D) in TNBC. Methods: In this multicenter study, eligible patients with stage I-III TNBC received carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 ) + pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days x 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was pCR (no evidence of invasive tumor in breast and axilla). Secondary endpoints were residual cancer burden (RCB), EFS, toxicity, and immune response biomarkers. RNA isolated from pretreatment tumor tissue was subjected to next generation sequencing. Samples were classified as DNA Damage Immune Response (DDIR) signature and DetermaIO signature positive/negative using predefined cutoffs. Evaluation of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) was performed using standard criteria. Results: 117 patients were enrolled from September 2018 to January 2022. 18% were African American, 39% had node positive disease, 88% had stage II/III disease and 15% had ER/PR 1-10%. Pathologic response information is available for 105 patients. pCR and RCB 0+1 rates were 60% (95% CI 51%-70%) and 71% (95% CI 62%-80%), respectively. Treatment related adverse events led to discontinuation of any trial drug in 12% of patients. Immune adverse events were observed in 28% of patients (Grade ≥3=6%). 47% of patients had sTILs ≥30%, 48% were DetermaIO positive, and 61% DDIR positive. The table describes the impact of these biomarkers on pCR and RCB. The areas under the prediction curve (AUC) for pCR were 0.660, 0.709, and 0.719 for DDIR, sTILs, and DetermaIO respectively. At a median follow up of 21 months, 2-year EFS is 88% in all patients; 98% in pCR group and 82% in no pCR group. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus Cb+D regimen yields pCR of 60% and 2-year EFS of 88% in the absence of adjuvant pembrolizumab. The regimen was well tolerated, and no new toxicity signals were noted. Immune enrichment identified by sTILs or DetermaIO signature was associated with high pCR rates approaching or exceeding 80%. PD-L1 and additional biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03639948. [Table: see text]
Abstract Purpose: Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (n = 48) or arm B (n = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%–69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%–68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; P = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (P = 0.02). Conclusions: The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.
Abstract Objectives/Rationale: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) are at high risk for disease recurrence and death. While multiple prognostic biomarkers associated with response to NAST have been identified, adaptive resistance mechanisms to NAST remain poorly understood. Identifying and characterizing adaptive resistance mechanisms can illuminate novel therapeutic approaches and improve outcomes for TNBC patients with RD. Methods: Total RNA was isolated from pre-treatment and paired surgical specimens (for patients with RD) from TNBC patients treated with chemotherapy on the NeoSTOP (NCT02413320) or chemoimmunotherapy on the NeoPACT (NCT03639948) neoadjuvant trials and was subjected to RNA exome sequencing. Comparative marker selection analysis was performed by computing the two-sided paired samples t-test for each gene followed by pre-ranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) amongst 23,797 annotated gene sets. Gene sets with false-discovery rate (FDR) corrected P values < 0.001 were determined to be significant. Results: Pre-treatment sequencing data were available for N=200 patients and the overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 56.5%. Paired pre- and post-treatment sequencing data were available for N=58 patients with RD (N=27 from NeoSTOP and N=31 from NeoPACT). 165/23,797 gene sets were significantly enriched in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples. SHEN_SMARCA2_TARGETS_UP (M29) was among the top five significantly enriched gene set and was selected for further analysis based on the known role of the SWI/SNF complex in cell survival and the availability of clinically viable SMARCA2 degraders. Pre-treatment SMARCA4 expression was associated with pCR, with lower median expression noted in patients with RD compared to patients who achieved pCR (P=0.04). Pre-treatment SMARCA2 expression was not associated with pCR (P=0.48). On paired sample analysis there was pronounced downregulation of SMARCA4 in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples in all patients (mean Z=-1.46, P< 0.0001), in patients treated with chemotherapy (mean Z=-1.65, P< 0.0001), and in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (mean Z=-1.28, P< 0.0001). Although there was no difference in SMARCA2 expression between paired pre- and post-treatment samples (mean Z=0.03, P=0.83), there was enrichment of SMARCA2 target expression on GSEA analysis (NES=2.63, FDR q< 0.00001) indicating that SMARCA2 activity is compensating for therapy-induced SMARCA4 loss. Conclusions: We identified 165 gene sets that were significantly enriched in paired post-treatment compared to pre-treatment TNBC samples. Altered activity of the SMARCA2 subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex was identified as one of the top hits. SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 are mutually exclusive subunits of SWI/SNF, and inactivation of both SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 is synthetic lethal. We observed an association of lower pre-treatment SMARCA4 expression with resistance to NAST and pronounced therapy-induced downregulation of SMARCA4 and induction of SMARCA2 target genes in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples, suggesting that SMARCA2 compensates for adaptive SMARCA4 loss. SMARCA2 degraders are in early-phase clinical trials and are known to induce synthetic lethality in SMARCA4-deficient cells. Our results identify adaptive loss of SMARCA4 and synthetic lethal targeting of compensatory SMARCA2 as an attractive therapeutic target in TNBC patients with RD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Citation Format: Shane Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Joshua Staley, Zachary Schmitt, Anne O'Dea, Lauren Nye, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Rashna Madan, Maura O'Neil, Andrew Godwin, Harsh Pathak, Qamar Khan, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Priyanka Sharma. SMARCA2 compensation of SMARCA4 loss mediates adaptive resistance to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer: paired transcriptomic analysis of pre- and post-treatment samples from NeoSTOP and NeoPACT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-13-07.