Large data analyses confirm the relative safety of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), except for those with advanced renal failure. However, the prevalence of post-contrast acute kidney injury may be masked by acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) in unstable inpatients, irrespective of contrast-enhanced imaging.In this work we aimed to assess AKI and AKR along with need for dialysis and mortality, among inpatients undergoing contrast-enhanced or non-enhanced CT. We performed a large-scale retrospective data analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) that compared patients undergoing contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced imaging. We also performed a subgroup analysis of subjects stratified by baseline renal function.A total of 41,456 patients were analyzed. PSM resulted in well-balanced groups. AKR occurred substantially more often than AKI among hospitalized patients following CT imaging, especially among those with low baseline renal function. Yet, in this population, whereas the rate of AKI significantly increased, the rate of AKR significantly decreased following contrast-enhanced studies as compared to patients that underwent non-enhanced CT. A significantly higher proportion of patients with baseline advanced renal failure that underwent contrast-enhanced imaging required dialysis.The increased incidence of AKI and AKR as seen in patients with lower pre-imaging kidney function possibly suggests that both entities reflect impaired renal functional reserve. Unstable kidney function in inpatients, as demonstrated by rates of AKR and AKI, is an important confounder which requires attention in similar observational studies on the renal effects of contrast media and of various other renal injurious events.
Background The overall risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) after computerized tomography (CT) is negligible, likely because of the small volume of injected iodinated contrast media required. However, the safety of contrast media–enhanced CT in patients with advanced renal functional impairment, an established major risk factor for PC-AKI, is unknown. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study using large data analysis of hospitalized patients at a single center. Adults undergoing CT or magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study and were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≤30 or >30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and by either contrast-enhanced or nonenhanced imaging. Only patients with serial determination of creatinine before and after imaging were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between groups were analyzed and compared using univariate analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 22,319 imaging studies were included. Patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or lower undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (n = 403) had an increased risk to develop PC-AKI than did similar patients undergoing enhanced or nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (n = 96) or nonenhanced CT (n = 1576) or patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with a preprocedural eGFR higher than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (n = 9173). These findings remained robust after propensity matching for demographic, procedural, and clinical parameters. Multivariate regression analysis of all patients undergoing CT with preimaging eGFR of 30 mL/min or lower (n = 1979) revealed that iodine-based contrast enhancement increased the likelihood of post-CT AKI by 51% (confidence interval, 1.23–2.05). Conclusion Although radiocontrast-enhanced CT is considered safe in most hospitalized patients and in ambulatory settings, the risk of PC-AKI remains significant among inpatients with substantial preimaging renal functional impairment. Caution is warranted using iodine-based enhanced CT in hospitalized patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or lower.
The effectiveness and safety of colonoscopy are directly dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. Multiple risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) have been identified; however, IBP is still reported in 20-30% of cases in most studies. We aimed to identify modifiable predictors of the adequacy of bowel preparation using sodium picosulfate, and to recommend easily modifiable parameters to increase the success rate of colonoscopies.This was a single-center observational study of adult outpatients referred for an elective colonoscopy. Patients were interviewed prior to colonoscopy; volume of liquids consumed was calculated as number of 200-mL cups showed to the patient. Additional information, including medical history, diagnoses and regular medications, was procured from patients' medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly associated with IBP in a subgroup analysis of high-risk patients.The rate of IBP in 1172 subjects was 19.4%. This rate decreased as fluid consumption increased, with a further drop associated with shorter intervals from end of preparation to colonoscopy. Drinking < 1.4 L significantly increased the risk of IBP (odds ratio [OR] 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-4.95), while drinking ≥2 L was associated with adequate preparation (OR 0.09, 95%CI 0-0.42). These associations were stronger in high-risk individuals.Greater fluid intake and short interval to colonoscopy are easily modifiable parameters that can substantially reduce the rate of IBP, especially among high-risk individuals.
Background: Crohn's disease displays heterogeneity in terms of disease location, progression and response to treatment. Most patients require an intestinal resection due to complicated disease, and a majority of them will experience disease recurrence. We aimed to characterize biological pathways driving postoperative recurrence and to identify predictors which could guide therapeutic management. Methods: In this multicentre prospective study, we conducted transcriptome analysis on ileal mucosa of CD patients undergoing ileocolonic resection. Samples were collected from the most inflamed part of the ileum (n=200), from the ileal resection margin (n=149) and in the neo-terminal ileum 6 months after surgery (n=122). The primary endpoint was postoperative endoscopic recurrence at month 6. We applied a regression model to identify gene signatures predicting for endoscopic recurrence. Findings: Molecular patterns of early endoscopic recurrence significantly differed from those observed in chronic inflammation. Gene expression analysis of the inflamed area of the surgical specimens identified clusters of CD patients. However, pathway gene signatures at the ileal margin were superior to those of the inflamed area to predict postoperative outcome. Several pathways, including JAK/STAT signalling, cell adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix protein were associated with a higher risk of endoscopic recurrence. JAK/STAT pathway activation at the ileal margin predicted early postoperative endoscopic recurrence (AUC of 0*74) and was associated with a higher of clinical relapse on the long term. A significant increase of p-STAT3 levels at the ileal margin was associated with severe endoscopic recurrence (i3, i4) compared to no recurrence (i0) (p=0*02) and moderate recurrence (i1, i2) (p=0*04). Interpretation: Gene expression analysis at the ileal margin of the surgical specimen may strongly predict postoperative outcome. The inflammatory processes associated with postoperative recurrence differ from those engaged in chronic inflammation. Activation of JAK/STAT signalling at the ileal margin of the surgical specimen is predictive of postoperative recurrence and should be specifically targeted.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03458195).Funding Statement: This work was supported by Helmsley Charitable Trust and the Institut national de santé et de la recherche biomedical (INSERM). Declaration of Interests: SN received honoraria from MSD, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, HAC Pharma, Tillots, Ferring, and Novartis. BP received honoraria from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Bioagaran, and Ferring. AB received honoraria from MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Takeda, Vifor Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Hospira, and Janssen. XT received honoraria from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Norgine, and Janssen. MF received honoraria from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Ferring, and Boehringer. PS received honoraria from Takeda, MSD, Biocodex, Ferring and Abbvie and financial support from Takeda. MA received honoraria from Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, and Genentech/Roche. All other authors have no conflict of interest regarding this study.Ethics Approval Statement: All patients provided an informed written consent. The study was approved by AFFSAPS (IDRCB: 2009-A00205-52) and the French Ethic Committee (CPP 2009/17).
Abstract Background 25% of UC patients fail to respond to induction therapy with biologics. In this nationwide study we aimed to evaluate trends in biologics utilization and sustainability in UC during the last 15 years. Methods This study was performed on data from four the four Israeli Health Maintenance Organizations, covering 98% of the population. Sustainability was defined as continuous treatment without IBD-related surgeries and at most one short steroid course. Sustainability was compared across different biologics utilizing a propensity score (PS) weighted analysis, estimated by generalized boosted modeling (GBM). Results 13,231 patients were diagnosed with UC in Israel since 2005 (1,426 [11%] pediatric-onset,11,805 [89%] adult-onset), of whom 1,692 (13%) were ever treated with biologics (400 [24%] pediatric-onset, 1,292 adults [76%], OR 3.2 [95%CI 2.8–3.6]; p<0.001) with a median of 6.4 years follow up (IQR 3.4–9.9). Infliximab was the most common first-line treatment in both children and adults (75% and 54%, respectively, p<0.001). However, in recent years there was an increase in adalimumab and vedolizumab utilization in parallel with a decrease in infliximab (Figure). The rate of initiating biologics in the first year of diagnosis increased from from 11% during 2005–2010 to 25% during 2011–2014 and 61% since 2015 (p<0.001). The use of combination therapy with immunomodulators is becoming less common and decreased with infliximab: from 36% in 2010 to 17% in 2018 (p<0.001) and with adalimumab from 32% to 12%, respectively (p<0.001). The sustainability rate in those treated with infliximab was 52% at one year from initiation of biologics, and 37% and 34% at three and five years, thereafter; compared to 55%, 43% and 40% with adalimumab and 72% and 67% after one and two years with vedolizumab. The primary non-response rate was 30% with infliximab, 31% with adalimumab and 16% with vedolizumab. Sustainability was associated with earlier initiation of biologics during the disease course (HR 0.9 [95%CI 0.85–0.95]). In the PS-adjusted model where vedolizumab served as the reference, the sustainability of both infliximab (HR 0.7 [95%CI 0.6–0.95]) and adalimumab (HR 0.8 [95%CI 0.6–0.99]) were lower. Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy increased the sustainability rate with both adalimumab (HR 0.3 [95%CI 0.2–0.6]) and infliximab (HR 0.4 [95%CI 0.-0.6]), but not with vedolizumab (HR 1.4 [95%CI 0.98–2.1]). Conclusion Biologics are being increasingly used in UC but only half of patients sustain treatment at one year. Treatment is commenced earlier during the disease course, and this is associated with improved sustainability. Sustainability rate is higher with vedolizumab, and in combination therapy of IMM and infliximab or adalimumab.
Background Concern exists regarding the renal safety of blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) during acute illness, especially in the presence of volume depletion and hemodynamic instability.
Privacy restrictions limit access to protected patient-derived health information for research purposes. Consequently, data anonymization is required to allow researchers data access for initial analysis before granting institutional review board approval. A system installed and activated at our institution enables synthetic data generation that mimics data from real electronic medical records, wherein only fictitious patients are listed.This paper aimed to validate the results obtained when analyzing synthetic structured data for medical research. A comprehensive validation process concerning meaningful clinical questions and various types of data was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of statistical estimates derived from synthetic patient data.A cross-hospital project was conducted to validate results obtained from synthetic data produced for five contemporary studies on various topics. For each study, results derived from synthetic data were compared with those based on real data. In addition, repeatedly generated synthetic datasets were used to estimate the bias and stability of results obtained from synthetic data.This study demonstrated that results derived from synthetic data were predictive of results from real data. When the number of patients was large relative to the number of variables used, highly accurate and strongly consistent results were observed between synthetic and real data. For studies based on smaller populations that accounted for confounders and modifiers by multivariate models, predictions were of moderate accuracy, yet clear trends were correctly observed.The use of synthetic structured data provides a close estimate to real data results and is thus a powerful tool in shaping research hypotheses and accessing estimated analyses, without risking patient privacy. Synthetic data enable broad access to data (eg, for out-of-organization researchers), and rapid, safe, and repeatable analysis of data in hospitals or other health organizations where patient privacy is a primary value.
