Abstract Objectives Data on quinolone consumption in the community were collected from 30 EU/European Economic Area (EEA) countries over two decades. This article reviews temporal trends, seasonal variation, presence of change-points and changes in the composition of main subgroups of quinolones. Methods For the period 1997–2017, data on consumption of quinolones, i.e. ATC group J01M, in the community and aggregated at the level of the active substance, were collected using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology (ATC/DDD index 2019). Consumption was expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day and in packages per 1000 inhabitants per day. Quinolone consumption was analysed by subgroups based on pharmacokinetic profile, and presented as trends, seasonal variation, presence of change-points and compositional changes. Results In 2017, quinolone consumption in the community expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day varied by a factor of 8.2 between countries with the highest (Bulgaria) and the lowest (Norway) consumption. The second-generation quinolones accounted for >50% of quinolone consumption in most countries. Quinolone consumption significantly increased up to 2001, and did not change significantly afterwards. Seasonal variation increased significantly over time. Proportional consumption of third-generation quinolones significantly increased over time relative to that of second-generation quinolones, while proportional consumption of both third- and second-generation quinolones significantly increased relative to that of first-generation quinolones. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin represented >40% of quinolone consumption in the community in southern EU/EEA countries. Conclusions Quinolone consumption in the community is no longer increasing in the EU/EEA, but its seasonal variation continues to increase significantly as is the proportion of quinolones to treat respiratory infections.
To assess the total systemic antiviral use in Europe and to identify the antiviral substances most commonly used. Within the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC; www.esac.ua.ac.be), using the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification and defined daily dose (DDD) measurement unit, data on total (out- and inpatient) systemic antiviral use (ATC J05), aggregated at the level of the active substance, were collected for 2008, and use was expressed in DDD (WHO ATC/DDD, version 2010) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Antiviral substances were grouped according to their main indication. In Europe, 12 countries (Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Russia, Slovenia and Sweden) provided total (out- and inpatient) data and 4 countries (Austria, the Netherlands, Portugal and Norway) provided outpatient data only. Total systemic antiviral use varied by a factor of 10.95 between the country with the highest (3.53 DID in France) and the country with the lowest (0.32 DID in Croatia) use. HIV/AIDS antivirals represented more than 50% of the total antiviral use in most countries. The amount and spectrum of antivirals used varied greatly between countries. Our study demonstrated a wide variation of total systemic antiviral use in several European countries, as striking as that of outpatient systemic antibiotic, antimycotic and antifungal use. The variation is mainly determined by the use of HIV/AIDS antivirals. These observations should stimulate further analysis to understand the variation of specific antiviral substances. The ESAC data facilitate auditing of antiviral prescriptions and evaluation of the implementation of guidelines and public health policies.
Conducted as part of the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project, this study aimed to identify key elements for a global definition of responsible antibiotic use based on diverse stakeholder input.A three-step RAND-modified Delphi method was applied. First, a systematic review of antibiotic stewardship literature and relevant organization web sites identified definitions and synonyms of responsible use. Identified elements of definitions were presented by questionnaire to a multidisciplinary international stakeholder panel for appraisal of their relevance. Finally, questionnaire results were discussed in a consensus meeting.The systematic review and the web site search identified 17 synonyms (e.g. appropriate, correct) and 22 potential elements to include in a definition of responsible use. Elements were grouped into patient-level (e.g. Indication, Documentation) or societal-level elements (e.g. Education, Future Effectiveness). Forty-eight stakeholders with diverse backgrounds [medical community, public health, patients, antibiotic research and development (R&D), regulators, governments] from 18 countries across all continents participated in the questionnaire. Based on relevance scores, 21 elements were retained, 9 were rephrased and 1 was added. Together, the 22 elements and associated best-practice descriptions comprise an exhaustive list of elements to be considered when defining responsible use.Combination of concepts from the literature and stakeholder opinion led to an international multidisciplinary consensus on a global definition of responsible antibiotic use. The widely diverging perspectives of stakeholders providing input should ensure the comprehensiveness and relevance of the definition for both individual patients and society. An aspirational goal would be to address all elements.
Outpatient antibiotic use in Belgium is among the highest in Europe. The most common reason for an encounter in out-of-hours (OOH) primary care is an infection. In this study, we assessed all consultations from July 2016 to June 2018 at five OOH services. We described antibiotic prescribing by diagnosis, calculated disease-specific antibiotic prescribing quality indicators' (APQI) values and critically appraised these APQI. We determined that 111,600 encounters resulted in 26,436 (23.7%) antibiotic prescriptions. The APQI diagnoses (i.e., bronchitis, upper respiratory infection, cystitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, otitis media, and pneumonia) covered 14,927 (56.7%) antibiotic prescriptions. Erysipelas (1344 (5.1%)) and teeth/gum disease (982 (3.7%)) covered more prescriptions than sinusitis or pneumonia. Over 75% of patients with tonsillitis and over 50% with bronchitis, sinusitis, and otitis media were prescribed an antibiotic. Only for otitis media the choice of antibiotic was near the acceptable range. Over 10% of patients with bronchitis or pneumonia and over 25% of female patients with an acute cystitis received quinolones. The APQI cover the diagnoses for only 57% of all antibiotic prescriptions. As 5.1% and 3.7% of antibiotic prescriptions are made for erysipelas and teeth/gum disease, respectively, we propose to add these indications when assessing antibiotic prescribing quality in OOH primary care.
To assess the proportion of parenteral treatment of the total outpatient antibiotic use in Europe, and to identify the antibiotic groups and individual antibiotics most commonly administered in this way.Within the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC; www.esac.ua.ac.be), using the anatomic therapeutic chemical (ATC) and defined daily dose (DDD) classification, data on outpatient use of antibacterials for systemic use (ATC J01), aggregated at the level of the active substance and expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID; WHO version 2007), were extracted for 2006 by route of administration and by country. Parenteral use was expressed as a percentage of the total outpatient use in DID.In 20 European countries, the total outpatient antibiotic use ranged from 27.91 DID in France to 9.58 DID in Russia. The proportion of outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment ranged from 6.75% in Russia to 0.001% in Iceland. The three most commonly used antibiotic groups for parenteral treatment in Europe were the cephalosporins (J01D; 44.58%), the aminoglycosides (J01G; 25.27%) and the penicillins (J01C; 17.78%). Four antibiotics [gentamicin (J01GB03) 18.53%; ceftriaxone (J01DD04) 17.85%; cefazolin (J01DB04) 13.16%; and lincomycin (J01FF02) 5.47%] represented more than half of the use.In all 20 European countries studied together, 2.04% of outpatient antibiotics were used for parenteral treatment. However, as for the total outpatient antibiotic use and the use of different antibiotic groups and antibiotics, there is a striking variation in the proportions of parenteral antibiotic use in Europe. More in-depth data on outpatient antibiotic use are needed to explain this variation.
To assess the total outpatient systemic antimycotic and antifungal use in Europe, and to identify the antimycotic and antifungal substances most commonly used.Within ESAC (www.esac.ua.ac.be), using the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) and defined daily dose (DDD) classification, data on outpatient use of all 14 antimycotics (12) and antifungals (2) for systemic use (ATC J02 and D01B, respectively), aggregated at the level of the active substance, were collected for 2007. Use was expressed in DDD (WHO ATC/DDD, version 2008) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Only countries for which data on both J02 and D01B use were available were included in the analysis.In 20 European countries (data for Cyprus and Estonia include hospital use), total outpatient systemic antimycotic and antifungal use varied by a factor of 6.7 between the country with the highest (3.03 DID in Belgium) and the country with the lowest (0.45 in Croatia) use. Terbinafine, ketoconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole represented >94% of the total outpatient antimycotic and antifungal use in all countries. Terbinafine use represented >50% of the total systemic antimycotic and antifungal use in 16 out of 20 countries (not in Croatia, Italy, Luxembourg and Bulgaria).We present for the first time a standardized and validated data set of outpatient systemic antimycotic and antifungal use in Europe. Our study demonstrates a variation of antimycotic and antifungal use in Europe, as striking as that of antibiotic use. The ESAC data facilitate the auditing of antimycotic and antifungal prescribing, and the evaluation of the implementation of guidelines and public health policies to promote their judicious use.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
