Abstract Background Treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) involves prolonged courses of multiple antibiotics that are variably tolerated and commonly cause adverse drug reactions (ADR). The purpose of this retrospective, single-center study was to identify demographic and disease-related variables associated with significant ADRs among patients treated with antibiotics against MAC-PD. Methods We reviewed all patients treated with antibiotic therapy for MAC-PD at a single center from 2000 to 2021. Patients were included if they met diagnostic criteria for MAC-PD, were prescribed targeted antibiotic therapy for any length of time and had their treatment course documented in their health record. We compared patients who completed antibiotics as originally prescribed (tolerant) with those whose antibiotic treatment course was modified or terminated secondary to an ADR (intolerant). Results Over the study period, 235 patients were prescribed antibiotic treatment with their clinical course documented in our center’s electronic health record, and 246 treatment courses were analyzed. One hundred forty-three (57%) tolerated therapy versus 108 (43%) experienced ADRs. Among the 108 intolerant courses, 67 (63%) required treatment modification and 49 (46%) required premature treatment termination. Treatment intolerance was associated more frequently with smear positive sputum cultures (34% vs. 20%, p = 0.009), a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (4 vs. 6, p = 0.007), and existing liver disease (7% vs. 1%, p = 0.03). There was no between-group difference in BMI (21 vs. 22), fibrocavitary disease (24 vs. 19%), or macrolide sensitivity (94 vs. 80%). The use of daily therapy was not associated with intolerance (77 vs. 79%). Intolerant patients were more likely to be culture positive after 6 months of treatment (44 vs. 25%). Conclusions Patients prescribed antibiotic therapy for MAC-PD are more likely to experience ADRs if they have smear positive sputum cultures at diagnosis, a higher CCI, or existing liver disease. Our study’s rate of early treatment cessation due to ADR’s was similar to that of other studies (20%) but is the first of its kind to evaluate patient and disease factors associated with ADR’s. A systematic approach to classifying and addressing ADRs for patients undergoing treatment for MAC-PD is an area for further investigation.
: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive disease characterized by dyspnea and loss of lung function. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) activation mediated by α
"Summary for Clinicians: Clinical Practice Guideline on Home Oxygen Therapy for Adults with Chronic Lung Disease." Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 18(9), pp. 1444–1449
Objective. To compare survival of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) versus idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and patients with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) versus other CTD-ILD followed at our center. Methods. We used the Stanford ILD database, which contains prospectively collected information on patients with ILD evaluated at our tertiary care center from 2002 to 2009. Survival at last followup from time of ILD diagnosis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Prognostic factors for survival in the overall cohort (IPF and CTD-ILD) and in the CTD-ILD group were identified with univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Results. Of 427 patients with ILD, 148 (35%) had IPF and 76 (18%) had CTD-ILD at the baseline visit. The cumulative incidence of CTD was 4%. After a median followup of 4 years, 67 patients (36.4%) had died and 4 (2.2%) were lost to followup. Patients with IPF (n = 122) and CTD-ILD (n = 62) experienced similar survival rates (5-year survival about 50%). Patients with SSc-ILD (n = 24) experienced better survival than those with other CTD-ILD (n = 38), with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 100%, 90%, and 77%, respectively, versus 78%, 42%, and 38% (p = 0.01). The presence of SSc in patients with CTD-ILD decreased the risk of death by > 80% even after correcting for age at ILD diagnosis, sex, and ethnicity (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.83). Conclusion. Survival in patients with SSc-ILD was better than in patients with other CTD-ILD, potentially related to routine screening for and early detection of ILD in patients with SSc at our center.
Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in connective tissue diseases (CTDs). We aimed to assess the effect of rituximab ± mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) compared with MMF on pulmonary function and prednisone dosage in patients with CTD‐related ILD (CTD‐ILD). Methods This retrospective study included 83 patients from Stanford and Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal. Fifteen patients received rituximab ± MMF (rituximab group), and 68 patients received MMF only (control group). Results Median ILD duration at the start of treatment was longer in the rituximab group at 47 months (range: 4‐170) versus 6.5 months (range: 0‐164) in controls. Forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased by 3.0% (range: 11%‐21%) after treatment in the rituximab group, whereas it increased by 2.0% (range: 14%‐25%) in the control group ( p = 0.025). Diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) decreased by 3.0% (range: 10%‐12%) after treatment in the rituximab group, whereas it increased by 4.5% (range: 30%‐36%) in the control group ( p = 0.046). Mixed model analysis controlling for ILD duration, baseline DLCO, systemic sclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, and prednisone use showed no significant difference in FVC or DLCO between groups at 6 months or 1 year. The average daily prednisone dose score decreased after treatment in the rituximab group, whereas it remained unchanged in the control group ( p = 0.017). Conclusion Rituximab ± MMF did not significantly change pulmonary function compared with MMF alone, but it did result in a relative decrease in average daily prednisone dose in a population with recalcitrant CTD‐ILD.
More than 1.5 million adults in the United States use supplemental oxygen for a variety of respiratory disorders to improve their quality of life and prolong survival. This document describes recommendations from a multidisciplinary workshop convened at the ATS International Conference in 2017 with the goal of optimizing home oxygen therapy for adults. Ideal supplemental oxygen therapy is patient-specific, provided by a qualified clinician, includes an individualized prescription and therapeutic education program, and offers oxygen systems that are safe, promote mobility, and treat hypoxemia. Recently, patients and clinicians report a growing number of problems with home oxygen in the United States. Oxygen users experience significant functional, mechanical, and financial problems and a lack of education related to their oxygen equipment-problems that impact their quality of life. Health care providers report a lack of readily accessible resources needed to prescribe oxygen systems correctly and efficiently. Patients with certain lung diseases are affected more than others because of physically unmanageable or inadequate portable systems. Analysis is needed to quantify the unintended impact that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Competitive Bidding Program has had on patients receiving supplemental oxygen from durable medical equipment providers. Studies using effectiveness and implementation research designs are needed to develop and evaluate new models for patient education, identify effective ways for stakeholders to interface, determine the economic benefit of having respiratory therapists perform in-home education and follow-up testing, and collaborate with technology companies to improve portable oxygen devices. Generation of additional evidence of the benefit of supplemental oxygen across the spectrum of advanced lung diseases and the development of clinical practice guidelines should both be prioritized.
In 2009, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) funded an assembly project, Palliative Management of Dyspnea Crisis, to focus on identification, management, and optimal resource utilization for effective palliation of acute episodes of dyspnea. We conducted a comprehensive search of the medical literature and evaluated available evidence from systematic evidence-based reviews (SEBRs) using a modified AMSTAR approach and then summarized the palliative management knowledge base for participants to use in discourse at a 2009 ATS workshop. We used an informal consensus process to develop a working definition of this novel entity and established an Ad Hoc Committee on Palliative Management of Dyspnea Crisis to further develop an official ATS document on the topic. The Ad Hoc Committee members defined dyspnea crisis as "sustained and severe resting breathing discomfort that occurs in patients with advanced, often life-limiting illness and overwhelms the patient and caregivers' ability to achieve symptom relief." Dyspnea crisis can occur suddenly and is characteristically without a reversible etiology. The workshop participants focused on dyspnea crisis management for patients in whom the goals of care are focused on palliation and for whom endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are not consistent with articulated preferences. However, approaches to dyspnea crisis may also be appropriate for patients electing life-sustaining treatment. The Ad Hoc Committee developed a Workshop Report concerning assessment of dyspnea crisis; ethical and professional considerations; efficient utilization, communication, and care coordination; clinical management of dyspnea crisis; development of patient education and provider aid products; and enhancing implementation with audit and quality improvement.
