Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella strains carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) are endemic to New York City and are spreading across the United States and internationally. Recent studies have indicated that the KPC structural gene is located on a 10-kb plasmid-borne element designated Tn4401. Fourteen Klebsiella pneumoniae strains and one Klebsiella oxytoca strain isolated at a New York City hospital in 2005 carrying either bla(KPC-2) or bla(KPC-3) were examined for isoforms of Tn4401. Ten of the Klebsiella strains contained a 100-bp deletion in Tn4401, corresponding to the Tn4401a isoform. The presence of this deletion adjacent to the upstream promoter region of bla(KPC) in Tn4401a resulted in a different -35 promoter sequence of TGGAGA than that of CTGATT present in isoform Tn4401b. Complete sequencing of one plasmid carrying bla(KPC) from each of three nonclonal isolates indicated the presence of genes encoding other types of antibiotic resistance determinants. The 70.6-kb plasmid from K. pneumoniae strain S9 carrying bla(KPC-2) revealed two identical copies of Tn4401b inserted in an inverse fashion, but in this case, one of the elements disrupted a group II self-splicing intron. In K. pneumoniae strain S15, the Tn4401a element carrying bla(KPC-2) was found on both a large 120-kb plasmid and a smaller 24-kb plasmid. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis results indicate that the isolates studied represent a heterogeneous group composed of unrelated as well as closely related Klebsiella strains. Our results suggest that endemic KPC-positive Klebsiella strains constitute a generally nonclonal population comprised of various alleles of bla(KPC) on several distinct plasmid genetic backgrounds. This study increases our understanding of the genetic composition of the evolving and expanding role of KPC-producing, healthcare-associated, gram-negative pathogens.
Supplementary Data from Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance
<p>Supplementary Data Supplementary Table 1: Key exclusion criteria Supplementary Table 2: Prior systemic therapies Supplementary Table 3: Subsequent anticancer therapy Supplementary Table 4: Mutations by response: cell-of-origin and genetic subtyping Supplementary Table 5: Representativeness of Study Participants Supplementary Figure 1: Study design Supplementary Figure 2: Plasma concentration of danvatirsen, acalabrutinib, and ACP-5862 (active metabolite of acalabrutinib) consistent with historical monotherapy data Supplementary Figure 3: EZB-related mutations by treatment response, number of cycles on treatment, cell-of-origin, and LymphGen cluster Supplementary Figure 4: STAT3 protein and ASO expression detection by IHC Supplementary Figure 5: Allele frequency over time for all patients by response Supplementary Figure 6: Copy number dynamics for all patients with available data by response Supplementary Figure 7: Peripheral blood analysis of gene expression associated with CD19+ B-cell signaling at baseline (A) and for baseline and longitudinal samples (B), and comparison of baseline gene expression of select B- and T-cell–specific genes in PBMCs in responders and nonresponders (C) Supplementary Figure 8: Peripheral blood analysis of gene expression associated with interferon-gamma signaling: baseline comparison (A) and baseline and longitudinal samples (B) Supplementary Figure 9: T-cell, B-cell, and NK-cell (TBNK) flow analysis: immunophenotyping in responders and nonresponders at baseline Supplementary Figure 10: Longitudinal immunophenotyping/immune cell population data (A) and percentage of CD4+ naïve T-cells among all CD4+ T cells (B) at each visit by treatment response Supplementary Figure 11: Pretreatment and on-treatment levels of cytokines/chemokines</p>
<p>Supplementary Data Supplementary Table 1: Key exclusion criteria Supplementary Table 2: Prior systemic therapies Supplementary Table 3: Subsequent anticancer therapy Supplementary Table 4: Mutations by response: cell-of-origin and genetic subtyping Supplementary Table 5: Representativeness of Study Participants Supplementary Figure 1: Study design Supplementary Figure 2: Plasma concentration of danvatirsen, acalabrutinib, and ACP-5862 (active metabolite of acalabrutinib) consistent with historical monotherapy data Supplementary Figure 3: EZB-related mutations by treatment response, number of cycles on treatment, cell-of-origin, and LymphGen cluster Supplementary Figure 4: STAT3 protein and ASO expression detection by IHC Supplementary Figure 5: Allele frequency over time for all patients by response Supplementary Figure 6: Copy number dynamics for all patients with available data by response Supplementary Figure 7: Peripheral blood analysis of gene expression associated with CD19+ B-cell signaling at baseline (A) and for baseline and longitudinal samples (B), and comparison of baseline gene expression of select B- and T-cell–specific genes in PBMCs in responders and nonresponders (C) Supplementary Figure 8: Peripheral blood analysis of gene expression associated with interferon-gamma signaling: baseline comparison (A) and baseline and longitudinal samples (B) Supplementary Figure 9: T-cell, B-cell, and NK-cell (TBNK) flow analysis: immunophenotyping in responders and nonresponders at baseline Supplementary Figure 10: Longitudinal immunophenotyping/immune cell population data (A) and percentage of CD4+ naïve T-cells among all CD4+ T cells (B) at each visit by treatment response Supplementary Figure 11: Pretreatment and on-treatment levels of cytokines/chemokines</p>
Sensitivity of short read DNA-sequencing for gene fusion detection is improving, but is hampered by the significant amount of noise composed of uninteresting or false positive hits in the data.In this paper we describe a tiered prioritisation approach to extract high impact gene fusion events from existing structural variant calls.Using cell line and patient DNA sequence data we improve the annotation and interpretation of structural variant calls to best highlight likely cancer driving fusions.We also considerably improve on the automated visualisation of the high impact structural variants to highlight the effects of the variants on the resulting transcripts.The resulting framework greatly improves on readily detecting clinically actionable structural variants.