Welcome to Annals of Global Health,Annals of Global Health is a peer-reviewed, fully open access, online journal dedicated to publishing high quality articles dedicated to all aspects of global health. The journal's mission is to advance global health, promote research, and foster the prevention and treatment of disease worldwide. Its goals are to improve the health and well-being of all people, advance health equity, and promote wise stewardship of the earth's environment. The latest journal impact factor is 3.64.Annals of Global Health is supported by the Program for Global Public Health and the Common Good at Boston College. It was founded in 1934 by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as the Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. It is a partner journal of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health. Authors of articles accepted for publication in Annals of Global Health will be asked to pay an Article Publication Charge (APC) to cover publication costs. This charge can normally be sourced from your funder or institution. We are committed to supporting authors from all countries to publish their work in Annals of Global Health regardless of national income level, and to achieve this goal, we waive the Article Publication Charge for manuscripts where all authors are from low-income or lower-middle-income countries (as defined by the World Bank). From time to time, Annals of Global Health publishes Special Collections, a series of articles organized around a common theme in global health. Recent Special Collections have included “Strengthening Women’s Leadership in Global Health”, “Decolonizing Global Health Education”, and “Capacity Building for Global Health Leadership Training”. Global health workers interested in developing a Special Collection are strongly encouraged to contact the Managing Editor in advance to discuss the project.
Awareness of the need for integrated approaches to health has grown with increasing realisation that human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health are intertwined and ultimately affect the livelihood and wellbeing of human beings, as well as planetary sustainability and resilience.1Karesh WB Dobson A Lloyd-Smith JO et al.Ecology of zoonoses: natural and unnatural histories.Lancet. 2012; 380: 1936-1945Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar, 2Romanelli C Cooper D Campbell-Lendrum D et al.Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health—a state of knowledge review. Convention on Biological Diversity and WHO, Geneva2015Google Scholar, 3Whitmee S Haines A Beyrer C et al.Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1973-2028Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1122) Google Scholar The origins of many diseases are rooted in how we produce and use food, water, energy, and other natural resources for a growing population,4Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsRaney Terry The State of Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome2013Google Scholar but also the way our living environments and social and economic interactions evolve.5Jones KE Patel NG Levy MA et al.Global trends in emerging infectious diseases.Nature. 2008; 451: 990-994Crossref PubMed Scopus (4491) Google Scholar Historically, this evolution was primarily driven by societies' desire to increase allocative efficiency and generate better welfare for human beings. In the past 3 decades, although millions of people have been lifted out of poverty, many poor sub-populations worldwide are mired in craters of inequality without opportunities.6Birdsall N Rising inequality in the new global economy. UN World Institute for Development Economics Research annual lecture.https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/rising-inequality-new-global-economyDate: 2005Google Scholar At the same time, many millions of people produce and consume far more than they need, and this overconsumption has been at enormous environmental and health cost. We are living in an unprecedented situation in which we are changing ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes more rapidly than ever, because of the number of human beings inhabiting the planet and the efficiency of our technological means. Harnessing opportunities to the benefit of humans without further undermining the ecosystem, other species, and our own health is a key element of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Although these goals set important targets in several dimensions of society, ecology, and economy, they also raise clearly conflicting agendas. As an example, continued economic growth remains elusive without environmental change and consumption of dwindling resources. This approach undermines the benefits people obtain from healthy ecosystems,7Hassan R Scholtes R Ash N Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. volume 1. Island Press, Washington, DC2005Google Scholar, 8Keune H, Kretsch C, De Blust G, et al. Science–policy challenges for biodiversity, public health and urbanization: examples from Belgium. Environ Res Lett 8: 19.Google Scholar potentially exacerbating conflict for the affected populations.9Stoett P Daszak P Romanelli X et al.Avoiding catastrophes: seeking synergies among the public health, environmental protection, and human security sectors.Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4: e680-e681Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar The global community struggles to capture and manage risks of our own doing, because they occur in a complex and dynamic system of many dimensions. With 23% of global deaths in 2012 attributed to unhealthy environments10Prüss-Ustün A Wolf J Corvalán C Bos R Neira M Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. World Health Organization, Geneva2016Google Scholar—plus morbidity and mortality from zoonotic disease, antimicrobial resistance from injudicious medical and agricultural use, and toxicity of pesticides and other chemicals—disease prevention through enhanced environmental resilience is clearly warranted. Shifting from the current paradigm of ever growing resource-intensive responses will require deep, structural change far beyond the clinical dimension. The One Health, Ecohealth, Planetary Health, and related approaches support systems based and integrative efforts of multiple disciplines working to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the environment. They can also be instrumental in collating concerns and real risks from multiple stakeholders in the living and inert world, and above all, emphasise upstream prevention opportunities such as equitable trade, welfare oriented animal husbandry and sustainable land use that promote public health. The regional One Health Inter-ministerial meetings WHO recently held in collaboration with the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and the UN Environmental Program (UNEP) are a strong step forward. These programmes are further strengthened by the Operational Framework for Good Governance by WHO and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) at the human-animal interface, which supports countries to bridge WHO and OIE toolkits for the assessment of national capacities. However, funding mechanisms and incentives remain limited to support operationalising One Health. For example, although the Contingency Fund for Emergencies provides crucial response resources for public health emergencies, the future Director-General of WHO should also advocate for long-term capacity and infrastructure investments across the UN that ultimately provide incentive for intersectorial collaboration and promote disease prevention. The clear dominance of anthropogenic change on our planet has changed the requirements for governance and leadership. The leadership of WHO in the Anthropocene should reflect a holistic approach to health. In this respect, we expect the future Director-General to facilitate shifting the global health conversation from a solely health security narrative towards a narrative of mutual benefits for the whole planet. We would hope that they consider decisions that are detrimental for future generations as important as decisions made for the benefit of our generation. Now more than ever, WHO should have the forethought to constructively engage diverse stakeholders and broaden the agenda to address underlying drivers of disease—including predatory economy, landscape change, rapidly changing food systems, and climate change, among other pressures. It is imperative that we optimise development investments for the future. For this, the Director-General will rely on a cabinet that include diverse perspectives, ensuring a focus beyond solely human health security aims, and a balanced approach that respects the necessity of healthy animals and ecosystems. We expect the Director-General to show exceptional courage by incorporating the importance and immediacy of an integrated health approach for future generations. This article is based upon work from COST Action (TD1404), supported by European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST). SRR reports grants from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (TD 1404). All other authors declare no competing interests.
The prediction of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) and the avoidance of their tremendous social and economic costs is contingent on the identification of their most likely drivers. It is argued that the drivers of global environmental change (and climate change as both a driver and an impact) are often the drivers of EIDs; and that the two overlap to such a strong degree that targeting these drivers is sound epidemiological policy. Several drivers overlap with the leading causes of biodiversity loss, providing opportunities for health and biodiversity sectors to generate synergies at local and global levels. This chapter provides a primer on EID ecology, reviews underlying drivers and mechanisms that facilitate pathogen spillover and spread, provides suggested policy and practice-based actions toward the prevention of EIDs in the context of environmental change, and identifies knowledge gaps for the purpose of further research.
One Health Database Africa The “One Health and Veterinary Systems in Africa: Taking stock of current coverage, needs, and opportunities to meet present and changing threats and optimize collaboration” is reviewing current capacity and programmatic status, gaps, and operations in each country and by sub-regions of Africa. This datasets combines multiple sources to produce a single One Health database containing selected indicators. The database encompasses 54 countries across the continent of Africa (according the UN).
Liberia comprises 43% of the upper Guinean tropical forest of West Africa, a global hotspot with high levels of biodiversity and endemism succumbing to accelerated rates of deforestation. Due in part to the country’s past civil war, knowledge about much of Liberia’s remaining local biodiversity is limited. To help fill this gap, we surveyed medium‑sized and large‑bodied mammals in a proposed protected area, the Marshall Wetlands, in Margibi County, Liberia. Using 21 camera traps, in an effort of 33,120 hours, and track surveys along trails, between July 2022 and May 2023, we confirmed the presence of 13 medium‑sized and large mam‑ mal species. Of these, four species have some degree of threat in the IUCN Red List. Despite its proximity to the capital city of Monrovia, the Marshall Wetlands comprise significant biodiversity, highlighting its conservation value and reinforcing the value of improved protected status.
Non-technical summary We summarize what we assess as the past year's most important findings within climate change research: limits to adaptation, vulnerability hotspots, new threats coming from the climate–health nexus, climate (im)mobility and security, sustainable practices for land use and finance, losses and damages, inclusive societal climate decisions and ways to overcome structural barriers to accelerate mitigation and limit global warming to below 2°C. Technical summary We synthesize 10 topics within climate research where there have been significant advances or emerging scientific consensus since January 2021. The selection of these insights was based on input from an international open call with broad disciplinary scope. Findings concern: (1) new aspects of soft and hard limits to adaptation; (2) the emergence of regional vulnerability hotspots from climate impacts and human vulnerability; (3) new threats on the climate–health horizon – some involving plants and animals; (4) climate (im)mobility and the need for anticipatory action; (5) security and climate; (6) sustainable land management as a prerequisite to land-based solutions; (7) sustainable finance practices in the private sector and the need for political guidance; (8) the urgent planetary imperative for addressing losses and damages; (9) inclusive societal choices for climate-resilient development and (10) how to overcome barriers to accelerate mitigation and limit global warming to below 2°C. Social media summary Science has evidence on barriers to mitigation and how to overcome them to avoid limits to adaptation across multiple fields.
Climate change has myriad implications for the health of humans, our ecosystems, and the ecological processes that sustain them. Projections of rising greenhouse gas emissions suggest increasing direct and indirect burden of infectious and noninfectious disease, effects on food and water security, and other societal disruptions. As the effects of climate change cannot be isolated from social and ecological determinants of disease that will mitigate or exacerbate forecasted health outcomes, multidisciplinary collaboration is critically needed.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
