One-third of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. The prognosis of these patients is poor. To identify potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ccRCC, we re-evaluated published long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression profiling data from the Gene Expression Omnibus and ArrayExpress database. We found that five lncRNAs were differentially expressed in ccRCC and adjacent tissues. These lncRNAs were assessed in an independent cohort of 71 paired patient samples using real-time PCR. Differences in expression of three of the lncRNAs (ENSG00000177133, TCL6, and ENSG00000244020) were validated in this analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that low expression of ENSG00000177133 and TCL6 was associated with a poor prognosis. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that TCL6 but not ENSG00000177133 expression was an independent predictor of ccRCC aggressiveness and had hazard ratios predictive of clinical outcome. TCL6 expression was negatively correlated with pTNM stage. Overexpression of TCL6 in 786-O and Caki-1 ccRCC cells decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis compared to controls. Our results indicate that lncRNA expression is altered in ccRCC and that decreased TCL6 expression may be an independent adverse prognostic factor in ccRCC patients.
Background: Disease-free survival (DFS) did not reflect accurate individual prognosis after initial diagnosis.As conditional DFS (CDFS) could provide dynamic prognostic information, we evaluated CDFS in these patients treated with or without sunitinib.Results: A total of 1329 patients with median follow-up 6.54 years were enrolled.CDFS improved continuously with disease-free survivorship increasing in both sunitinib and placebo group with minimal difference.In placebo arm, the CDFS of surviving to five year after living 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 65%, 78%, 87%, and 95% (observed 5-year DFS: 51%).Dynamic changes of HR showed adjuvant sunitinib decrease relapse risks during the first 1.5 years after surgery (P < 0.03).Conclusions: Our study provided contemporary data of CDFS and change of relapse HR in high-risk ccRCC patients after adjuvant sunitinib or placebo.The remarkable improvement in CDFS highlighted the importance of disease-free interval as a strong indicator in patient counseling and surveillance planning.Materials and Methods: The primary end point was CDFS and the second end point was smooth hazard ratios (HR) for the prediction of relapses.The differences of conditional survival were compared with the calculation of d value.
Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare and recently recognized subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Apart from the classic morphology comprising conventional three components, there exist a large number of non-classic morphological variants of MTSCC, which make it necessity to differentiate from other RCC. Herein, we report two non-classic morphological variants of MTSCC. Case 1, a 85 years old man, showed numerous vacuoles among inherent components and cytoplasmic pallor/clearing within tubules mimicking conventional clear cell RCC with a 8.5 years follow-up, while Case 2 indicated a "mucin-poor" MTSCC associated with simultaneous conventional clear cell RCC at her age of 73 years. Until now Case 1 carries the longest disease-free survival reported in literature since MTSCC was defined and ranks the oldest since reported in literature, while Case 2 is the first report of "mucin-poor" MTSCC associated with simultaneous conventional clear cell RCC. Now, since no biomarkers or imagining tools but pathological examination can confirm the diagnosis of MTSCC, the management is always following the guideline of RCC in clinical practice. Generally, most reports consider it as a good prognosis disease, but sarcomatoid variant, even classic subtype can progress rapidly to life-threatening disease.
ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH) is a distinctive subtype of Cushing’s syndrome (CS), with different clinical manifestations according to the level of serum cortisol. Based on clinical manifestations and serum cortisol, we divide AIMAH into three types, subclinical AIMAH, clinical AIMAH and high-risk AIMAH, with varied treatment methods being adapted to different subtypes. At the same time, we describe 3 patients who represent these subtypes of this disease, and review some cases of AIMAH which have been previously reported in the English literature. To our knowledge, this is the first article discussing classification, diagnosis and treatment of this disease and should be useful for future therapy of AIMAH.
To investigate the changes in the size of the penis after radical prostatectomy (RP) and the possible influencing factors.This study included 45 cases of RP for PCa performed by the same surgeon from January to June 2019. Before and at 2 weeks after surgery, we measured the stretched penile length (SPL), flaccid penile length (FPL) and penile circumference of the patients. We conducted an IIEF-5 questionnaire investigation on the preoperative characteristics of the patients and their attitudes towards postoperative penile rehabilitation. We also analyzed the factors associated with the postoperative changes in the size of the penis.Compared with the baseline, the postoperative SPL ([9.72 ± 1.87] vs [7.80 ± 1.57] cm, P = 0), FPL ([6.26 ± 1.14] vs [5.13 ± 1.10] cm, P = 0) and penile circumference ([7.69 ± 0.83] vs [7.26 ± 0.78] cm, P = 0.012) were decreased significantly, by (1.92 ± 0.12) cm, (1.13 ± 0.09) cm and (0.43 ± 0.08) cm, respectively. The age of the patients was significantly correlated with the change of the FPL (P = 0.042), but not the other factors with the change of the penile size. Twenty-six (57.7%) cases of severe and moderate ED were observed in the patients postoperatively. Those with better preoperative sexual function took a more positive attitude towards penile rehabilitation and treatment postoperatively (n = 3, 75.0%).The penile size of the PCa patient is decreased markedly after radical prostatectomy, with a significant correlation between the patient's age and the postoperative change of the flaccid penile length. The patients with better preoperative sexual function are more likely to seek penile rehabilitation and treatment postoperatively.
To investigate the attitudes of prostate cancer (PCa) patients towards postoperative penile rehabilitation and their influencing factors.Seventy-nine PCa patients underwent radical prostatectomy from January through June 2017 and all received a questionnaire investigation before surgery on IIEF-5 and their attitudes towards postoperative penile rehabilitation. We analyzed the reasons for the patients' rejection of postoperative penile rehabilitation.Totally 56 (71%) of the patients accepted and the other 23 (29%) refused postoperative penile rehabilitation. The factors influencing their attitudes towards penile rehabilitation mainly included age (P = 0.023), income (P = 0.040), tumor stage (P = 0.044), and preoperative sexual activity (P = 0.004). The patients who accepted penile rehabilitation had significantly higher IIEF-5 scores than those who refused it (14.75 ± 0.88 vs 8.48 ± 1.16, P = 0.000 2). During the follow-up period, only 29 (36.7%) of the patients bought the vacuum erection device but not the other 50 (63.3%). The tumor stage (P = 0.004), income (P < 0.01) and preoperative androgen-deprivation therapy (P = 0.039) significantly influenced the patients' decision on the purchase of the device. Relevant admission education achieved a 45% decrease in the number of the patients unwilling to accept penile rehabilitation for worrying about its negative effect on cancer treatment, a 25% decrease in those rejecting penile rehabilitation because of age, and a 20% decrease in those refusing it due to the tumor stage. The cost of treatment was an important reason for the patients' rejection of postoperative penile rehabilitation.The tumor stage and income are the main factors influencing PCa patients' decision on postoperative penile rehabilitation. Relevant admission education and reduced cost of rehabilitation are important for popularization of postoperative penile rehabilitation in PCa patients.
Using conventional imaging modalities, it is difficult to detect recurrent lesions in prostate cancer patients who have undergone biochemical relapse, especially in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We retrospectively reviewed the files of fifty patients with histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer who underwent 99mTc-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bone scan within a 30-day period. PSMA-SPECT/CT indicated metastatic lesions in 39 patients and had a higher detection rate (78.0%) than bone scan (34.0%) or MRI (40.0%). The diagnostic efficiency of PSMA-SPECT/CT imaging for bone and lymph node metastases (50.0% and 42.0%) was better than bone scan (34.0% and 0.0%) or MRI (24.0% and 20.0%). PSMA-SPECT/CT provided a higher detection rate at serum PSA levels of ≤1 ng ml-1, 1-4 ng ml-1, 4-10 ng ml-1, and >10 ng ml-1. No correlation was found between Gleason score, PSA level, and the tracer tumor/background ratio of metastatic lesions. With the aid of PSMA-SPECT/CT imaging, the therapeutic strategy was changed for 31 patients, and this may have enhanced their clinical outcome. In conclusion, PSMA-SPECT/CT imaging could detect more metastatic lesions and achieve a higher detection rate than conventional imaging modalities at different serum PSA levels in prostate cancer patients who had undergone biochemical relapse.