Although ''Do not resuscitate'' (DNR) orders are among the most commonly discussed patient preference treatment measures, few studies have assessed internal medicine residents' views on this complex topic. Our objective was to assess resident practices in establishing code status. We also examined resident training and experiences in pronouncing death.An 18-question survey addressing DNR discussions and pronouncing death was emailed to internal medicine residents in the state of Illinois. Each question had multiple-choice options.A total of 175 residents completed the questionnaire (22% response rate). Seventy-eight percent of the residents had discussed DNR status with patients or their families at least 9 times. However, only one third of the residents felt very comfortable in such discussions. Only 26% of the residents had been observed by a faculty member during a code status discussion and fewer (16%) while pronouncing death. Do not resuscitate discussions rarely occurred in an outpatient clinic (27%). Most residents (90%) thought they would benefit from formal training in DNR discussion.Although most residents discuss DNR status with patients and families, only a quarter are observed in such discussions by attending physicians and only a third feel comfortable with this aspect of clinical care. Developing a structured residency program curriculum to address resident skills in end-of-life care would benefit residency training.
Advance care planning, including code/resuscitation status discussion, is an essential part of the medical care of patients with CKD. There is little information on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in these patients. We aimed to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in these patients.Our study is observational in nature. We compared the following cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related outcomes in patients with CKD with those in the general population by using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005-2011): (1) survival to hospital discharge, (2) discharge destination, and (3) length of hospital stay. All of the patients were 18 years old or older.During the study period, 71,961 patients with CKD underwent in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with 323,620 patients from the general population. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were higher in patients with CKD (75% versus 72%; P<0.001) on univariate analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, and potential confounders, patients with CKD had higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.34; P≤0.001) and length of stay (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.15; P=0.001). Hospitalization charges were also greater in patients with CKD. There was no overall difference in postcardiopulmonary resuscitation nursing home placement between the two groups. In a separate subanalysis of patients ≥75 years old with CKD, higher odds of in-hospital mortality were also seen in the patients with CKD (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.17; P=0.01).In conclusion, we observed slightly higher in-hospital mortality in patients with CKD undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Forty-eight chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients (pts) completed questionnaires that used linear analogue scales (LAS), yes/no responses, and demographic data collection to characterize sleep disorders. Twenty-five pts (52%) reported problems sleeping. These pts graded sleep problems significantly higher than those without sleep problems (6.5 +/- 3 vs. 1.8 +/- 2, p less than 0.001 by LAS). Those with sleep disorders were more likely to smoke cigarettes (13/25 vs. 6/23, p less than 0.05) and have bone pain (14/25 vs. 6/23, p less than 0.05). No differences among pts with and without sleep problems were seen in age, gender, time on dialysis, caffeine intake, pruritus, feelings of sadness, worry, or anxiety, or Kt/V values (1.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2, p less than 0.13). Restless legs (84%), onset insomnia (76%), and nighttime (76%) and early A.M. waking (72%) characterized the sleep disorders; symptoms suggesting nocturnal myoclonus were less common (20%). We conclude that sleep disorders are common in HD pts and may be exacerbated by tobacco use, bone pain, and restless legs. Kt/V does not correlate with sleep disorders. Further examination of this problem, including formal sleep studies, is needed.
Standard peritoneal dialysate has a relatively high calcium concentration of 3.5 mEq/l. Peritoneal dialysis patients thus gain calcium from the dialysate which contributes to the risk of hypercalcemia. Dialysate with 2.5 mEq/l calcium is now available. Theoretically, using dialysate with this calcium content, calcium transfer should be negative (from the patient into the dialysate) when the patient is hypercalcemic, and positive when the patient is normocalcemic or hypercalcemic. Thus, 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate may allow larger doses of calcium carbonate to be prescribed. We compared calcium mass transfer (CMT) in 17 stable peritoneal dialysis patients using 3.5 and 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate. A solution of 2.05 l, 1.5 g/dl dextrose was dwelled for 4 hours. Calcium was measured in the drained dialysate and serum (total and ionized). Mean CMT was 0.7 +/- 0.5 mEq/exchange using 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate and -0.9 +/- 0.9 mEq/exchange using 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate (p less than 0.0001). At the time of the CMT studies, the mean serum ionized calcium levels were identical for the two groups (2.6 mEq/l). CMT correlated inversely with serum total calcium, serum ionized calcium, and drained dialysate volume. During hypercalcemia calcium transfer was from the dialysate to the patient when 3.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used, but from the patient to the dialysate when 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate was used. We conclude that 2.5 mEq/l calcium dialysate is effective in removing calcium and will be helpful in preventing hypercalcemia when large doses of oral calcium compounds are prescribed as a phosphate binder.
