Substances with an antifertility activity can be delivered directly into the vagina and the uterus. Indeed, it has been known for decades that the vaginal mucosa is an excellent way through which to deliver a number of compounds to the general circulation. Research and development efforts have concentrated on rings delivering only progestins, or both an estrogen and a progestin. The only combined ring marketed so far releases 15 µg ethynyl estradiol and 120 µg etonogestrel, and has a failure rate between one and two per 100 women-years of use. It has a preset duration of action of 1 month, has to be inserted before day 5 of the cycle, irrespective of the presence of menstrual flow, and withdrawn after 21 days, thereby allowing proper cycle control. Among rings releasing only a progestin, one device releasing progesterone has been marketed; all others are still under development. Unlike other long-term methods, vaginal rings do not require the involvement of a healthcare professional and can be inserted and removed by the user. The first attempt at achieving contraception by inserting a device in the uterus is 100 years old. Half a century later, medicated intrauterine systems were investigated; they are superior to inert devices and today a number of active principles, such as copper and progestogens, have been incorporated and tested when released from an intrauterine device (IUD). Copper-releasing devices last more than 10 years, with cumulative pregnancy rates of between approximately 5 and 3, and cumulative expulsion rates between approximately 12 and 8. With all IUDs, bleeding and pain are the most common reasons for a request to withdraw a device. There is agreement that fertility after removal of a copper-IUD is not impaired. Finally, the overall risk of ectopic pregnancy is reduced in IUD users, compared with using no contraception. The first progestogen-releasing system contained progesterone, had 1-year duration of action and was marketed some 30 years ago; unfortunately, it was shown that failure caused an increase of extrauterine pregnancies. This potentially dangerous effect eventually led to the withdrawal of the device from the market. In the meantime, a device releasing the synthetic progestin levonorgestrel was being developed and has now been successfully marketed; it lasts for a minimum of 5 years and, although absorbed systemically, cyclic function is maintained. The system is one of the most effective methods of contraception available today: large clinical studies indicate a Pearl index of 0.1 per 100 woman-years. Although a postfertilization effect cannot be excluded, in a majority of cases, intrauterine systems act as true contraceptives, preventing fertilization.
A number of synthetic steroids are capable of modulating progesterone receptors with a spectrum of activities ranging from pure antagonism to a mixture of agonism and antagonism. The best known of these are mifepristone (RU 486), asoprisnil (J 867), onapristone (ZK 98299), ulipristal (CDB 2914), Proellex() (CDB 4124), ORG 33628 and ORG 31710.Outside reproduction selective modulators of progesterone receptors have been under investigation for a large variety of indications, for example in oncology as adjuvants in breast, cervical, endometrial, ovarian and prostate cancer, as well as inoperable meningioma and leiomyosarcoma. In addition, they have been used as antiglucocorticoids. It is therefore useful to review the results obtained in these conditions.A careful evaluation of existing major review papers and of recently published articles was carried out for the indications under review, focusing not only on mifepristone but also on those other selective modulators of progesterone receptors for which data are available.In preliminary studies selective modulators of progesterone receptors had some activity on a number of neoplasias. Their antiglucocorticoid activity has been tested with some success in Cushing's syndrome, several psychiatric conditions (e.g., mood disorders and Alzheimer's disease) and acute renal failure. Finally they are being used in a gene regulator system.
In the last decade, the risk benefits ratio of MHT has been evaluated mainly in terms of cardiovascular risk. Present Consensus Statement is largely inspired by the Global Consensus on Menopausal Hormone Therapy in 2013 and 2016 by leading global menopause societies (The American Society for Reproductive Medicine, The Asia Pacific Menopause Federation, The Endocrine Society, The European Menopause and Andropause Society, The International Menopause Society, The International Osteoporosis Foundation and The North American Menopause Society).
Demand for second-trimester induced abortions (STIAs) increases in Italy. For these procedures, prostaglandins alone were used until 2010, when mifepristone became available. The present study compares the two modalities, and investigates the reasons for STIAs.The records of all such procedures performed at the Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Urology of the 'Sapienza' University (Rome), between January 2004 and December 2012, and of all those done at the 'San Filippo' Hospital (Rome), between January 2010 and December 2012, were analysed. Data gathered included women's age, obstetric history, reasons for requesting the STIA, gestational age, mode of intervention, and complications if any.During the study period, 353 women requested a STIA. Karyotype or genetic anomalies were the reason for the request in 187 cases (53%), while structural anomalies, both single and multiple, were given as the reason in 158 (45%). In most cases, these anomalies were assessed by ultrasound scan.Few studies have investigated reasons for requesting STIAs. Of all chromosome abnormalities diagnosed in this study, trisomy 21 was the most common (59%) and it was the most frequent reason for requesting pregnancy termination.
Following a historical overview, the ovulation-inhibiting effect of various orally administered estrogen-progestin combinations (combined oral contraceptives [COCs]) are examined for their components alone or in the various combined formulations. Special emphasis is given to products containing natural estrogens. Areas covered: Inhibition of ovulation with progestins alone; estrogens alone; various progestins in combination with ethinyl estradiol; various progestins in combination with natural estrogens (estradiol, estradiol valerate, and estetrol). Expert commentary: The original idea to achieve ovulation blockage through the administration of steroid hormones involved the use a progestogen (both progesterone and its synthetic homologous). The ability of a progestin to inhibit ovulation depends on the type of compound and on its dosage and a difference of more than 20-fold in activity exists between compounds utilized today in COCs. Initially, the estrogenic component was present only because it contaminated the first progestin utilized. It was soon found that an estrogen is necessary for proper cycle control. It was also found that the estrogen acts synergistically in inhibiting ovulation. For almost half a century, most COCs contained ethinyl estradiol. Today, also natural estrogens are being employed. Inhibition of ovulation was complete with all early high dose preparations. Decreasing dosage allowed some ovarian activity to occur, occasionally leading to a mature follicle. Even in this situation, defective corpus luteum formation assured contraceptive protection.
The term progestogen has been widely utilized to indicate the general class of agents that includes both progesterone and its synthetic analogs, whereas the term progestin refers only to synthetic progestational steroids. The development of progestins has been influenced in a major way by the search for orally active hormonal contraceptives, since it is likely that hormonal contraceptives will continue to utilize a progestin, the only possible alternative being represented by the utilization of antiprogestins. Synthetic progestogens in clinical use today belong to three main chemical families: progesterone derivatives (progesterone, retro-progesterone, 19-norprogesterone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone); gonane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate); a spironolactone derivative. Biological potency of progestogens varies depending on the end-point measured, usually ovulation inhibition and endometrial transformation; with both these tests, the most active compounds are all gonane derivatives, with a potency over a 100 times that of the natural hormone. When administered in adequate doses, a progestin inhibits fertility by inhibiting ovulation. This action is mainly exerted at the hypothalamic level where, physiologically, progesterone decreases the number of LH pulses. When progestogens are delivered directly to the uterine cavity, their action seems to be purely local. It has been amply proven that - even when administered in doses that do not constantly inhibit ovulation - a progestin can still remain effective as a contraceptive by acting at the level of the cervical mucus and, at least in part, of the endometrium. Progestogens utilized today differ largely in their pharmacokinetics. In general, after intake, these compounds are rapidly absorbed and distributed so that peak serum concentrations are reached between 1 and 4 h. Third-generation progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) have common characteristics: a higher affinity for progesterone receptors than their predecessors, a lower affinity for androgen receptors, a higher selectivity of action, a higher central inhibitory activity, a higher potency at the level of the endometrium, and an overall metabolic neutrality, in terms of effects on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. In general, progestins can induce two types of adverse effects: changes in lipid metabolism and bleeding irregularities. Whereas the newer compounds seem to have overcome the first of these adverse effects, the second remains untouched: to this day, proper cycle control can only be achieved with combined hormonal contraceptives.
Aim. In order to analyse of stillbirths, we collected all the cases observed from January 1993 to December 2006 at the Department of Gynecological Sciences, Perinatology and Child Care, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. Methods. For each case, age of the patient, parity, country of origin, gestational age at the moment of stillbirth, clinical condition before pregnancy, pathologies occurred during pregnancy, possible therapies and autopsy of the fetus, have been collected. To evaluate and classify the obtained data, both the NICE (Neonatal and Intrauterine Death Classification according to Etiology) and the ReCoDe (Relevant Condition at Death) classifications have been utilised; the first one being more suitable than the second for our case series. Results. Results showed that among 25 892 labours, 186 were intrauterine deaths (7.2%o). In 1999 we noticed a decrease in the number of labours of approx. 30%, due to a reduction in the number of inpatients available spaces. The number of stillbirths presented a slithering line until 2001, while after then a marked decrease has been observed. Conclusion. A high percentage of stillbirths had to be classified as unknown causes (26.9%).Additional prospective research, in order to achieve a better classification, is needed. All the new cases, should be classified using the most appropriate parameter, drawing attention to all the possible issues, and centralizing the data acquired.
Introduction: The risk-benefit profile of any pharmacologic agent must be evaluated against risks connected with the events to be avoided. This is especially true in the case of hormonal contraception, not intended to combat a disease.Over the six decades during which their use has progressively expanded, the risk-benefit profile of combined oral contraceptives (COC) has substantially changed, with new combinations, dosages and mode of administration appearing on the market.Area covered: In a series of articles, recent information on the complex issue of COC risks and benefits will be reviewed in the hope of providing an updated picture.The present article reviews metabolic changes occurring during use of modern combinations of estrogens (ethinyl estradiol, estradiol, estradiol valerate and estetrol) and new progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, dienogest, drospirenone, nomegestrol acetate), often compared to classic compounds, such as levonorgestrel.Three categories of metabolic effects in healthy women are detailed: on carbohydrates, lipid and bone mineral content.Expert commentary: Overall, the picture is reassuring: the new generations of progestins are basically devoid of androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid related side-effects. This should result in an improved safety profile, although past history teaches us that that large comparative and surveillance studies are required before firm conclusions can be drawn.At any rate, available evidence indicates that metabolic effects of third and fourth generation progestins, especially when they are combined with natural estrogens, are minimal and, if used in healthy women, should not cause concern.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(72)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' transform='rotate(-72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23c' transform='rotate(144)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
