Left ventricular filling may be studied non-invasively by Doppler echocardiographic recording of transmitral blood flow. This study reports the variations in this flow induced by changing cardiac preload by administering trinitrin or by vascular filling in 27 patients undergoing catheterisation. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was measured by the pig-tail catheter used for ventriculography. Transmitral flow was recorded by pulsed Doppler using the apical view. The parameters studied were those of the early diastolic E wave and the end diastolic A wave. The hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements were performed under basal conditions, after trinitrin and after vascular filling. Trinitrin was given to 14 patients and led to a fall in LVEDP from 17.6 +/- 4.5 to 6.7 +/- 1.4 mmHg (p less than 0.001). The amplitude of the mitral E wave decreased and the E/A ratio fell from 0.93 +/- 0.37 to 0.71 +/- 0.32 (p less than 0.001). Thirteen patients underwent vascular filling which increased LVEDP from 10.9 +/- 5 to 27 +/- 4 mmHg (p less than 0.001). The mitral E wave increased and the E/A ratio rose from 0.96 +/- 0.32 to 1.27 +/- 0.23 (p less than 0.01). The patients received trinitrin and then underwent vascular filling. The LVEDP decreased from 16 +/- 3.9 to 8 +/- 2.9 mmHg (p less than 0.001) and then rose to 28.3 +/- 3.5 mmHg (p less than 0.001). The E/A ratio fell after trinitrin from 0.91 +/- 0.40 to 0.58 +/- 0.30 (p less than 0.01) and then rose to 1.42 +/- 0.60 (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Summary The effects of varying clinically relevant patterns of anaesthetic‐vasoconstrictor combinations used for peri‐radicular surgery on plasma concentrations of catecholamines and haemodynamic responses was studied in the canine model. Five mongrel dogs were anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbital. A femoral canula was inserted to measure central blood pressure and an ECG was used to monitor heart rate and any associated arrhythmias. Femoral venous blood samples were drawn before initial injection and at 3 and 10 min after injections. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were determined using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Injection protocols used three time periods, 30, 60 and 90s, with solutions containing 1:100000 and 1:50000 adrenaline. No significant changes in heart rates or presence of arrythymias were noted over the experimental protocol. Catecholamine levels in pico moles mL ‐1 were within the normal range at the 3‐min sample level. At the 10‐min sample time there was a more erratic range of concentrations, with most samples within the normal range. This may have been due to endogenous release of catecholamines in specific animals. The data identified trends in both the haemodynamic parameters and plasma catecholamine levels that can legitimately support the careful use of higher levels of a vasoconstrictor when patient profiles and surgical needs dictate.
Abstract Twenty‐eight brachial arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) flows were assessed by the Stewart and Hamilton method by bolus dye injection. These measurements were divided in two groups: a first group with dye injection into the AVF artery and a second group with dye injection into the efferent vessel of the AVF in close proximity. The increase and the decrease of dye concentration were regular and the circulation occurred very late in both groups. Reproducibility was assessed by the usual index: the mean of the differences between two successive measurements of each series related to the first of these two and expressed as a percentage, m(Q n ‐ Q n ‐ 1 )/Q n %. In the two groups, the reproducibility index was at 10.1%, similar to the index applied to Grimby's results, measuring successive cardiac output by dye bolus injection at 9.8%. Theoretical criteria of validity of the Stewart and Hamilton method were checked for all measurements. Even when the duration of the measurement was very short, arteriovenous flow fulfilled the criteria of validity in the same way as cardiac output. Two AVF flows were measured successively at both injection sites with no difference between the obtained values. The same reproducibility of the efferent vessel injection site group suggests that an arterial puncture is not necessary for a correct assessment of AFV flow.
