The sharp decrease in open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has raised concerns about contemporary postoperative outcomes. The study was designed to analyse the impact of complications on clinical outcomes within 30 days following OSR.Patients who underwent OSR for intact AAA registered prospectively between 2016 and 2019 in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit were included. Complications and outcomes (death, secondary interventions, prolonged hospitalization) were evaluated. The adjusted relative risk (aRr) and 95 per cent confidence intervals were computed using Poisson regression. Subsequently, the population-attributable fraction (PAF) was calculated. The PAF reflects the expected percentage reduction of an outcome if a complication were to be completely prevented.A total of 1657 patients were analysed. Bowel ischaemia and renal complications had the largest impact on death (aRr 12·44 (95 per cent c.i. 7·95 to 19·84) at PAF 20 (95 per cent c.i. 8·4 to 31·5) per cent and aRr 5·07 (95 per cent c.i. 3·18 to 8.07) at PAF 14 (95 per cent c.i. 0·7 to 27·0) per cent, respectively). Arterial occlusion had the greatest impact on secondary interventions (aRr 11·28 (95 per cent c.i. 8·90 to 14·30) at PAF 21 (95 per cent c.i. 14·7 to 28·1) per cent), and pneumonia (aRr 2·52 (95 per cent c.i. 2·04 to 3·10) at PAF 13 (95 per cent c.i. 8·3 to 17·8) per cent) on prolonged hospitalization. Small effects were observed on outcomes for other complications.The greatest clinical impact following OSR can be made by focusing on measures to reduce the occurrence of bowel ischaemia, arterial occlusion and pneumonia.
Aortocaval fistulas are a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of aortic aneurysms. They pose a significant diagnostic challenge due to their aspecific presentation. We describe two cases of patients who were admitted to the emergency room with an unusual presentation. The first patient was a 69-year-old male, with a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, who was admitted to our hospital with a painful and swollen left leg. The second patient was a 75-year-old male with a history of coronary artery bypass graft and cholecystectomy who was admitted due to a swollen left leg and dyspnea. We also give a review of the literature regarding the clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of aortocaval fistulas.
Previous studies have focused on patient-related risk factors to explain the higher mortality risk in women undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether hospital-related factors influence outcomes following AAA repair in women.
Introduction: Neoadjuvant therapy plays an important role in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.Indication and timing of subsequent surgery are important subjects of current debate.The aim was 1) to evaluate the application of neoadjuvant therapy in the Netherlands and hospital variation and 2) to analyze the treatment strategies regarding timing of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment.Methods: Data from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit of 2009-2011 were used.6208 patients surgically treated for rectal cancer were included.Type of neoadjuvant treatment was evaluated in different patient characteristics and tumor stages.Timing of surgery after 5x5Gy radiotherapy and chemoradiation was examined with stratification for type of hospital (regional, training, teaching hospital).Results: In total, 83% of patients had a form of neoadjuvant treatment.Comorbidity (Charlson score ≥ 2) and age (> 70 years) were hardly reasons to abandon this: 75% and 78% of patients were treated.In stage I tumors, 77% of patients was treated, but large hospital variation existed [0-100%].After 5x5Gy, 90% of patients was operated on within 2 weeks radiotherapy in peripheral hospitals, while in the academy 42% of operations were performed after 4 weeks.After chemoradiation, timing of surgery was later in academic hospitals as well.Conclusion: From an international perspective, a very high percentage of patients is treated with neoadjuvant therapy in the Netherlands.The risk of local recurrence must be balanced against functional symptoms and mortality from secondary disease.For stage I tumors, the disadvantages prevail and in anticipation to new guidelines, some hospitals already limited the indication for neoadjuvant therapy.Recent publications of the MERCURY group show that the indication of neoadjuvant therapy can be narrowed using preoperative MRI without an increased risk of recurrence even for low-risk T3 or N+ tumors.Also, the good international oncological outcomes with less use of neoadjuvant therapy appoint this.Recent literature suggests a positive influence of a 'late' timing of surgery after chemoradiation on pathologic complete response.Academic hospitals seem to have responded to this.A similar level of downstaging was observed after short radiotherapy with delayed surgery and would be a good alternative for the elderly and patients with comorbidity.5x5Gy radiotherapy followed by systemic chemotherapy during the waiting time seems effective for synchronous resectable metastases.
ObjectiveThe Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) initiative was established in 2013 to monitor and improve nationwide outcomes of aortic aneurysm surgery. The objective of this study was to examine whether outcomes of surgery for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (iAAA) have improved over time.MethodsPatients who underwent primary repair of an iAAA by standard endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) between 2014 and 2019 were selected from the DSAA for inclusion. The primary outcome was peri-operative mortality trend per year, stratified by OSR and EVAR. Secondary outcomes were trends per year in major complications, textbook outcome (TbO), and characteristics of treated patients. The trends per year were evaluated and reported in odds ratios per year.ResultsIn this study, 11 624 patients (74.8%) underwent EVAR and 3 908 patients (25.2%) underwent OSR. For EVAR, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no improvement in peri-operative mortality (aOR [adjusted odds ratio] 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 – 1.20), while major complications decreased (2014: 10.1%, 2019: 7.0%; aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 – 0.95) and the TbO rate increased (2014: 68.1%, 2019: 80.9%; aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 – 1.16). For OSR, the peri-operative mortality decreased (2014: 6.1%, 2019: 4.6%; aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 – 0.98), as well as major complications (2014: 28.6%, 2019: 23.3%; aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 – 0.99). Furthermore, the proportion of TbO increased (2014: 49.1%, 2019: 58.3%; aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 – 1.10). In both the EVAR and OSR group, the proportion of patients with cardiac comorbidity increased.ConclusionSince the establishment of this nationwide quality improvement initiative (DSAA), all outcomes of iAAA repair following EVAR and OSR have improved, except for peri-operative mortality following EVAR which remained unchanged. The Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) initiative was established in 2013 to monitor and improve nationwide outcomes of aortic aneurysm surgery. The objective of this study was to examine whether outcomes of surgery for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (iAAA) have improved over time. Patients who underwent primary repair of an iAAA by standard endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) between 2014 and 2019 were selected from the DSAA for inclusion. The primary outcome was peri-operative mortality trend per year, stratified by OSR and EVAR. Secondary outcomes were trends per year in major complications, textbook outcome (TbO), and characteristics of treated patients. The trends per year were evaluated and reported in odds ratios per year. In this study, 11 624 patients (74.8%) underwent EVAR and 3 908 patients (25.2%) underwent OSR. For EVAR, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no improvement in peri-operative mortality (aOR [adjusted odds ratio] 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 – 1.20), while major complications decreased (2014: 10.1%, 2019: 7.0%; aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 – 0.95) and the TbO rate increased (2014: 68.1%, 2019: 80.9%; aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 – 1.16). For OSR, the peri-operative mortality decreased (2014: 6.1%, 2019: 4.6%; aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 – 0.98), as well as major complications (2014: 28.6%, 2019: 23.3%; aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 – 0.99). Furthermore, the proportion of TbO increased (2014: 49.1%, 2019: 58.3%; aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 – 1.10). In both the EVAR and OSR group, the proportion of patients with cardiac comorbidity increased. Since the establishment of this nationwide quality improvement initiative (DSAA), all outcomes of iAAA repair following EVAR and OSR have improved, except for peri-operative mortality following EVAR which remained unchanged.
