Abstract Background Drug resistance to chemotherapy is often associated with increased malignancy in neuroblastoma (NB). One explanation for the link between resistance and malignancy might be that resistance facilitates cancer progression and invasion. To investigate this hypothesis, adhesion, transendothelial penetration and NCAM (CD56) adhesion receptor expression of drug-resistant versus drug-sensitive NB tumor cells were evaluated. Methods Acquired drug resistance was mimicked by exposing parental UKF-NB-2, UKF-NB-3 or IMR-32 tumor cells to increasing concentrations of vincristine- (VCR) or doxorubicin (DOX) to establish the resistant tumor cell sublines UKF-NB-2 VCR , UKF-NB-2 DOX , UKF-NB-3 VCR , UKF-NB-3 DOX , IMR-32 VCR and IMR-32 DOX . Additionally, the malignant behaviour of UKF-NB-4, which already possessed the intrinsic multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype, was analyzed. UKF-NB-4 exposed to VCR or DOX were designated UKF-NB-4 VCR or UKF-NB-4 DOX . Combined phase contrast – reflection interference contrast microscopy was used to separately evaluate NB cell adhesion and penetration. NCAM was analyzed by flow cytometry, western blot and RT-PCR. Results VCR and DOX resistant tumor sublines showed enhanced adhesion and penetration capacity, compared to their drug naïve controls. Strongest effects were seen with UKF-NB-2 VCR , UKF-NB-3 VCR and IMR-32 DOX . DOX or VCR treatment also evoked increased invasive behaviour of UKF-NB-4. The process of accelerated tumor invasion was accompanied by decreased NCAM surface and protein expression, and down-regulation of NCAM coding mRNA. Transfection of UKF-NB-4 VCR cells with NCAM cDNA led to a significant receptor up-regulation, paralleled by diminished adhesion to an endothelial cell monolayer. Conclusion It is concluded that NB cells resistant to anticancer drugs acquire increased invasive capacity relative to non-resistant parental cells, and that enhanced invasion is caused by strong down-regulation of NCAM adhesion receptors.
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) accelerates tissue regeneration and ameliorates tissue fibrosis through its ligand c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase. Hence, HGF is currently discussed as an attractive therapeutic candidate for fatal liver diseases. However, it remains unclear whether c-Met of de-differentiated hepatocytes adequately responds to HGF in an impaired liver. Therefore, we investigated c-Met expression and c-Met responsiveness to HGF in an experimental de-differentiation cell culture system. Primary rat hepatocytes were seeded on a two-dimensional collagen matrix or embedded within a three dimensional collagen gel to guarantee intact cell geometry. Cells were cultivated in a growth factor enriched extracellular milieu (de-differentiation medium), or in a chemically defined differentiation medium, representing physiologically intact hepatocytes. c-Met surface expression was determined by flow cytometry. Receptor localisation was examined by confocal microscopy, c-Met and phosphorylated c-Met protein were determined by western blotting. Hepatocyte-specific asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPr) was examined to control the differentiation status of the cells. Growth factor enriched milieu induced a rapid loss of ASGPr with a significant increase of c-Met surface level and a decrease in c-Met protein level. Surprisingly, the increased amount of c-Met surface expression was associated with its loss of responsiveness to HGF. The addition of bile acids into the culture medium had significantly delayed the process of de-differentiation and restrained the drastic elevation of c-Met (tauroursodeoxycholic acid > ursodeoxycholic acid). Application of the three-dimensional hepatocellular architecture stabilized the c-Met surface receptor level and rendered c-Met activation. We have demonstrated that growth factor enriched extracellular milieu and loss of intact liver architecture seems to be accompanied by an up-regulation of c-Met surface level. Our findings suggest that irresponsiveness of c-Met to soluble HGF was possibly caused by an excessive HGF production and receptor over-stimulation. Both events should be considered when establishing an HGF-based therapy for fibrosis/cirrhosis.
In vitro models have suggested that chemokines of the CXC family may regulate prostate cancer cell proliferation and dissemination. In this study, we evaluated the expression of CXC receptors (CXCRs) and CXC ligands (CXCLs) in prostate cancer tissue. CXCL1-16 and CXCR1-6 mRNA were identified by RT-PCR in prostate tumors and adjacent normal tissue specimens. Samples were obtained from 49 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. mRNA expression was semiquantitatively scored and correlated with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the Gleason score, early patient follow-up and Kattan postoperative prediction. CXCL12 mRNA expression level was significantly enhanced, whereas CXCL13 was reduced in prostate tumor compared to adjacent 'normal' tissue. No differences were observed in the CXCR4 mRNA level; however, both CXCR3 and CXCR5 were reduced significantly in the tumor tissue. The difference in CXCL12 and CXCL13 (CXCLΔ) correlated significantly with PSA levels and the Gleason score. Furthermore, CXCLΔ correlated significantly with the Kattan postoperative nomogram. Tumor progression was observed in patients with high CXCLΔ values, but not in those with low values, in early follow-up. The development and progression of prostate cancer was accompanied by alterations of CXC chemokine expression, in particular CXCL12, CXCL13, CXCR3 and CXCR5. Novel treatment options could therefore be targeted at one or several of these proteins. The practicability of CXC chemokines as potential prognostic markers requires further study.
The pathophysiologic mechanisms behind urologic disease are increasingly being elucidated. The object of this investigation was to evaluate the publication policies of urologic journals during a period of progressively better understanding and management of urologic disease. Based on the ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports and the PubMed database, the number and percentage of original experimental, original clinical, review or commentarial articles published between 2002-2010 in six leading urologic journals were analyzed. "British Journal of Urology International", "European Urology", "Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations" ("Urologic Oncology"), "Urology", "The Journal of Urology", and "World Journal of Urology" were chosen, because these journals publish articles in all four categories. The publication policies of the six journals were very heterogeneous during the time period from 2002 to 2010. The percentage of original experimental and original clinical articles, related to all categories, remained the same in "British Journal of Urology International", "Urologic Oncology", "Urology" and "The Journal of Urology". The percentage of experimental reports in "World Journal of Urology" between 2002-2010 significantly increased from 10 to 20%. A distinct elevation in the percentage of commentarial articles accompanied by a reduction of clinical articles became evident in "European Urology" which significantly correlated with a large increase in the journal's impact factor. No clearly superior policy could be identified with regard to a general increase in the impact factors from all the journals. The publication policy of urologic journals does not expressly reflect the increase in scientific knowledge, which has occurred over the period 2002-2010. One way of increasing the exposure of urologists to research and expand the interface between experimental and clinical research, would be to enlarge the percentage of experimental articles published. There is no indication that such policy would be detrimental to a journal's impact factor.
Tumor development remains one of the major obstacles following organ transplantation. Immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus directly contribute to enhanced malignancy, whereas the influence of the novel compound mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on tumor cell dissemination has not been explored. We therefore investigated the adhesion capacity of colon, pancreas, prostate and kidney carcinoma cell lines to endothelium, as well as their beta1 integrin expression profile before and after MMF treatment. Tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cell monolayers was evaluated in the presence of 0.1 and 1 μM MMF and compared to unstimulated controls. beta1 integrin analysis included alpha1beta1 (CD49a), alpha2beta1 (CD49b), alpha3beta1 (CD49c), alpha4beta1 (CD49d), alpha5beta1 (CD49e), and alpha6beta1 (CD49f) receptors, and was carried out by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Adhesion of the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 was strongly reduced in the presence of 0.1 μM MMF. This effect was accompanied by down-regulation of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 surface expression and of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 coding mRNA. Adhesion of the prostate tumor cell line DU-145 was blocked dose-dependently by MMF. In contrast to MMF's effects on HT-29 cells, MMF dose-dependently up-regulated alpha1beta1, alpha2beta1, alpha3beta1, and alpha5beta1 on DU-145 tumor cell membranes. We conclude that MMF possesses distinct anti-tumoral properties, particularly in colon and prostate carcinoma cells. Adhesion blockage of HT-29 cells was due to the loss of alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 surface expression, which might contribute to a reduced invasive behaviour of this tumor entity. The enhancement of integrin beta1 subtypes observed in DU-145 cells possibly causes re-differentiation towards a low-invasive phenotype.