<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a precursor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Low-grade dysplasia has a relatively good prognosis, whereas high-grade dysplasia and IPMN invasive carcinoma require surgical intervention. However, diagnostic distinction is difficult. We aimed to identify biomarkers in peripheral blood for accurate discrimination.</p>Experimental Design:<p>Sera were obtained from 302 patients with IPMNs and 88 healthy donors. For protein biomarkers, serum samples were analyzed on microarrays made of 2,977 antibodies. A support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was applied to define classifiers, which were validated on a separate sample set. For microRNA biomarkers, a PCR-based screen was performed for discovery. Biomarker candidates confirmed by quantitative PCR were used to train SVM classifiers, followed by validation in a different sample set. Finally, a combined SVM classifier was established entirely independent of the earlier analyses, again using different samples for training and validation.</p>Results:<p>Panels of 26 proteins or seven microRNAs could distinguish high- and low-risk IPMN with an AUC value of 95% and 94%, respectively. Upon combination, a panel of five proteins and three miRNAs yielded an AUC of 97%. These values were much better than those obtained in the same patient cohort by using the guideline criteria for discrimination. In addition, accurate discrimination was achieved between other patient subgroups.</p>Conclusions:<p>Protein and microRNA biomarkers in blood allow precise diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMN cases, which should improve patient management and thus the prognosis of IPMN patients.</p><p><i><a href="https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3977" target="_blank">See related commentary by Löhr and Pantel, p. 1387</a></i></p></div>
miRNA profiles are promising biomarker candidates for a manifold of human pathologies, opening new avenues for diagnosis and prognosis. Beyond studies that describe miRNAs frequently as markers for specific traits, we asked whether a general pattern for miRNAs across many diseases exists. We evaluated genome-wide circulating profiles of 1,049 patients suffering from 19 different cancer and non-cancer diseases as well as unaffected controls. The results were validated on 319 individuals using qRT-PCR. We discovered 34 miRNAs with strong disease association. Among those, we found substantially decreased levels of hsa-miR-144* and hsa-miR-20b with AUC of 0.751 (95% CI: 0.703–0.799), respectively. We also discovered a set of miRNAs, including hsa-miR-155*, as rather stable markers, offering reasonable control miRNAs for future studies. The strong downregulation of hsa-miR-144* and the less variable pattern of hsa-miR-155* has been validated in a cohort of 319 samples in three different centers. Here, breast cancer as an additional disease phenotype not included in the screening phase has been included as the 20th trait. Our study on 1,368 patients including 1,049 genome-wide miRNA profiles and 319 qRT-PCR validations further underscores the high potential of specific blood-borne miRNA patterns as molecular biomarkers. Importantly, we highlight 34 miRNAs that are generally dysregulated in human pathologies. Although these markers are not specific to certain diseases they may add to the diagnosis in combination with other markers, building a specific signature. Besides these dysregulated miRNAs, we propose a set of constant miRNAs that may be used as control markers.
Studies have indicated that some genes involved in carcinogenesis are highly methylated in their promoter regions but nevertheless strongly transcribed. It has been proposed that transcription factors could bind specifically to methylated promoters and trigger transcription. We looked at this rather comprehensively for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and studied some cases in more detail. Some 2% of regulated genes in PDAC exhibited higher transcription coupled to promoter hypermethylation in comparison to healthy tissue. Screening 661 transcription factors, several were found to bind specifically to methylated promoters, in particular molecules of the NFAT family. One of them—NFATc1—was substantially more strongly expressed in PDAC than control tissue and exhibited a strong oncogenic role. Functional studies combined with computational analyses allowed determining affected genes. A prominent one was gene ALDH1A3, which accelerates PDAC metastasis and correlates with a bad prognosis. Further studies confirmed the direct up-regulation of ALDH1A3 transcription by NFATc1 promoter binding in a methylation-dependent process, providing insights into the oncogenic role of transcription activation in PDAC that is promoted by DNA methylation.
Abstract Introduction and aims: Although the overall five-year survival of all patients with cancer stands at 63%, for pancreatic cancer patients, it is a disheartening 8% - a number that remains largely unchanged for three decades. Of the patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, about 85% exhibit pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Most of these patients die within 4 to 6 months after diagnosis. The poor prognosis is caused by the detection at only late stages, and lack of effective options for chemotherapy. The widely used chemotherapeutic agent gemcitabine, confers a median survival advantage of only 6 months, and resistance to therapy develops in the vast majority of patients. Given this poor prognosis of patients with PDAC, there is an urgent need to find more effective therapies. Experimental procedures: Microarrays were used to perform global gene expression profiling in 195 PDAC and 41 normal pancreatic tissue samples. Using these profiling data, we undertook an extensive analysis of PDAC transcriptome by superimposing the pathway context and interaction networks of aberrantly expressed genes to identify factors with central roles in PDAC pathways. Next, tissue microarray analysis (TMA) were used to verify the expression of the candidate target in independent set of 152 samples comprising 40 normal pancreatic tissues, 49 chronic pancreatitis sections (CP) and 63 PDAC samples. We further validated the functional relevance of the candidate molecule through RNA interference (RNAi) and pharmacological inhibition in vitro and in vivo. Results: We identified dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) as a key modulator of cancer pathways in PDAC. DRD2 up-regulation at the protein level was validated in a large independent sample cohort. Most importantly, we found that blockade of DRD2, through RNAi or pharmacological inhibition using FDA-approved antagonists hampers the proliferative and invasive capacities of pancreatic cancer cells while modulating cAMP and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways. Also, we observed a potent effect of DRD2 antagonists on inhibition of cancer cell proliferation using different model of primary and metastatic tumor cells derived from spontaneous pancreatic cancer mouse models and patient-derived pancreatic adenocarcinoma mouse xenograft (PDX) models. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that inhibiting DRD2 represents a novel therapeutic approach for PDAC. Since DRD2 inhibitors are already in the clinic for the management of schizophrenia, our results from this study could support a drug repurposing strategy to expedite clinical evaluation of these agents as novel therapy against pancreatic cancer. Citation Format: Pouria Jandaghi, Hamed S. Najafabadi, Andrea Bauer, Andreas I. Papadakis, Matteo Fassan, Anita Hall, Anie Monast, Maryam Safisamghabadi, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, John P. Neoptolemos, Eithne Costello, William Greenhalf, Aldo Scarpa, Bence Sipos, Daniel Auld, Mark Lathrop, Morag Park, Markus W. Büchler, Oliver Strobel, Thilo Hackert, Nathalia Giese, George Zogopoulos, Veena Sangwan, Sidong Huang, Jörg D. Hoheisel, Yaser Riazalhosseini. DRD2 is critical for pancreatic cancer and promises pharmacological therapy by already established antagonists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1135. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1135