This study examined current academic achievement test use and assessment practices in the United States. Special education administrators from 725 US school districts were surveyed using an online platform to determine current trends in the use of norm-referenced academic achievement tests (NRTs) and curriculum-based measures (CBMs). Administrators reported that school psychologists most commonly administered the NRTs used to help determine special education eligibility, although special education teachers also fill this role frequently, particularly in Western states. General and special educators are the most likely staff to administer CBMs. A detailed accounting of academic achievement assessment practices is discussed including which tests are used and the differences in assessment roles by region and district locale. Implications of these findings for the training of educators and for research are considered.
Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) can be successfully placed in general education classrooms with evidence-based practices such as positive behavior interventions and supports and self-management practices. Still, less than half of all students with EBD are placed in the general education classroom for 80% of the school day. Teachers' general support for the inclusion of students with disabilities is mediated by their beliefs about disability and their sense of preparation for teaching in inclusive settings. Teachers may support less restrictive settings for students with EBD if these teachers view disability through the tenets of disability studies in education. A framework for infusing these tenets into teacher preparation programs is proposed to help increase the practice of inclusive education for students with EBD.