Abstract Background: Bone-only (BO) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), defined as bone as unique site of metastasis at MBC diagnosis, is thought to carry a better prognosis among MBC. However, only small retrospective series and data from selected randomized controlled trials have been reported so far. Based on a national database, we aimed at providing a large comprehensive analysis of BO MBC, and at evaluating its impact on clinical outcome. Methods: The ESME MBC platform (NCT03275311) is a French multicenter retrospective real-life database using a clinical trial-like methodology to collect data from 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. It includes data from each newly diagnosed MBC patient having initiated at least one treatment between 2008 and 2016. BO cases occurring in women were retrieved and compared to the overall non-BO population, regarding treatment effects and survival. Results: Of the 22,463 women selected in the database, 5,041 (22.4%) patients with BO disease were identified. Most (N=4,102, 81.4%) had HR+/HER2- disease while 644 (12.8%) and 295 (5.9%) patients had HER2+ or HR-/HER2- disease, respectively. Compared to non-BO MBC, BO MBC patients were older in the global cohort and in HR-/HER2- patients (mean age 61.0y versus 59.5y, and 59.3y vs 56.4y, all p<0.0001, respectively), and tumor histology was more frequently a lobular carcinoma in the global cohort, in HR+/HER2- and in HR-/HER2- patients (18.6% vs 10.8%, 20.6% vs 15.2%, 13.8% vs 3.2%, all p<0.0001, respectively). In addition, metastatic disease occurred de novo more frequently in BO MBC patients (37.9% versus 29.2%) (p<0.0001), and a statistically significant difference was also observed within each tumor subtype group. The management of bone disease included bisphosphonates or denosumab, radiotherapy, and invasive bone metastasis procedures in 3,913 (77.6%), 2,929 (58.1%), and 1,154 (22.9%) patients, respectively. Median follow up was 52.4 months (95% CI [50.8-54.2]) in BO population and 50.9 months (95% CI [49.7-51.8]) in non-BO population. BO MBC patients had improved median progression-free survival (PFS) 1, regarding first-line treatment, and overall survival (OS) compared to non-BO MBC, globally and within each tumor subtype group (Table). Indeed, 5-year OS rates reached up to 43%, 54% and 16% in HR+/HER2-, HER2+ and HR-/HER2- BO MBC groups, respectively. This suggests that a substantial number of these patients could be considered as long survivors. In the BO MBC cohort, de novo BO MBC patients had a higher 5-year OS rate than relapsed BO MBC patients. BO disease was an independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio 0.68 (95% CI [0.65-0.72]), p<0.0001) together with age, tumor subtype, grade, adjuvant treatment and metastatic-free interval. Conclusion: This large comprehensive study is the largest cohort of BO MBC to date. BO MBC has a distinct presentation from non-BO MBC and carry a better prognosis compared to non-BO MBC. A significant proportion of BO MBC patients have a very long survival and may benefit from aggressive local therapy, as stereotactic radiotherapy. Dedicated studies are warranted to tailor the management of these patients. Funding: This work was supported by UNICANCER. The ESME MBC database is supported by an industrial consortium (Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai and Daiichi Sankyo). Data collection, analyses and publications are totally managed by R&D UNICANCER independently of the industrial consortium. TableBOBOBOBOnon-BOnon-BOnon-BOnon-BON (%)median OS monthsmedian PFS1 months5-year OS rate %N (%)median OS monthsmedian PFS1 months5-year OS rate %(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)Overall population5,041 (100%)52.1 (50.3-54.1) 13.1 (12.6-13.8) 43.41 (41.66-45.15)15,054 (100%)34.7 (34.0-35.6) 8.5 (8.3-8.7) 30.55 (29.62-31.48)HR+/HER-4,102 (81.4%)52.6 (50.5-54.8)13.6 (13.0-14.3)43.52 (41.56-45.46)9,127 (60.6%) 39.0 (37.8-40.1)9.6 (9.3-9.9)32.69 (31.47-33.93)HER2+644 (12.8%)66.4 (59.8-71.9) 14.9 (12.9-17.3) 54.49 (49.54-59.16)3,265 (21.7%) 46.5 (44.2-48.9)10.6 (10.1-11.3)39.88 (37.77-41.98)HR-/HER2-295 (5.9%)20.8 (18.3-27.4) 5.6 (4.9-7.5)16.21 (11.21-22.02)2,662 (17.7%) 14.3 (13.6-15.1)4.8 (4.6-5.0)10.89 (9.4-12.5)De novo MBC patients1,909 (37.9%)58.6 (55.4-62.1)17.9 (17.0-18.9)48.24 (45.28-51.14)4,399 (29.2%) ---Relapsed MBC patients3,132 (62.1%)48.3 (46.5-50.5)10.7 (10.2-11.2)40.51 (38.34-42.67)10,655 (70.8%)--- Citation Format: Marion Bertho, Julien Fraisse, Anne Patsouris, Paul Cottu, Suzette Delaloge, David Pérol, Anne Jaffré, Anthony Goncalves, Marie-Paule Lebitasy, Véronique D'Hondt, Florence Dalenc, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Christelle Levy, Patrick Arveux, Roman Rouzier, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Mathias Breton, Michaël Chevrot, Marianne Leheurteur, Michel Velten, Gaëtane Simon, Jean-Sébastien Frenel. Impact of bone-only metastatic breast cancer on outcome in a real-life setting: A comprehensive analysis of 5,041 women from the ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-19-01.
<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>In patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the first-line treatment success will depend on both the tumor-primary chemosensitivity and the completeness of interval debulking surgery (IDS). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), calculated with the CA-125 longitudinal kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days, is a validated early marker of tumor chemosensitivity. The objective was to investigate the role of the chemosensitivity relative to the success of first-line medical–surgical treatment.</p>Experimental Design:<p>The CA-125 concentrations were prospectively measured in the randomized phase II trial CHIVA (NCT01583322, carboplatin–paclitaxel regimen ± nintedanib, and IDS, <i>n</i> = 188 patients). The KELIM predictive value regarding the tumor response rate, likelihood of complete IDS, risk of subsequent platinum-resistant relapse (PtRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate tests.</p>Results:<p>The data from 134 patients were analyzed. KELIM was an independent and major predictor of subsequent PtRR risk, and of survivals. The final logistic regression model, including KELIM [OR = 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03–0.49] and complete IDS (no vs. yes, OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.76) highlights the preponderant role of chemosensitivity on the success of the first-line treatment. In patients with highly chemosensitive diseases, the patient prognosis was driven more by the chemotherapy-induced antitumor effects than by the surgery.</p>Conclusions:<p>The tumor-primary chemosensitivity, assessed by the modeled CA-125 KELIM calculated during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (<a href="http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo" target="_blank">http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo</a>), may be a major parameter to consider for decision-making regarding IDS attempt, and selecting patients for treatments meant to reverse the primary chemoresistance.</p><p><i>See related commentary by May and Oza, p. 4432</i></p></div>
Treatment and outcomes of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have dramatically improved over the past 20 years. This work evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes according to age.Women who initiated a treatment for HER2+ MBC between 2008 and 2016 in one of the 18 French comprehensive centers part of the ESME program were included. Objectives were the description of first-line treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), first-line progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors among patients aged 70 years or more (70+), or less than 70 (<70).Of 4045 women diagnosed with an HER2+ MBC, 814 (20%) were 70+. Standard first-line treatment (chemotherapy combined with an anti-HER2 therapy) was prescribed in 65% of 70+ versus 89% of <70 patients (p < 0.01). Median OS was 49.2 (95% CI, 47.1-52.4), 35.3 (95% CI, 31.5-37.0) and 54.2 months (95% CI, 50.8-55.7) in the whole population, in patients 70+ and <70, respectively. Corresponding median PFS1 were 12.8 (95% CI, 12.3-13.3), 11.1 (95% CI, 10.0-12.3) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 12.7-13.9), respectively. In 70+ women, initiation of non-standard first-line treatment had an independent detrimental time-varying effect on both OS and PFS (HR on OS at 1 year: chemotherapy without anti-HER2 2.79 [95% CI: 2.05-3.79]; endocrine therapy and/or anti-HER2 1.96 [95% CI: 1.43-2.69]).In this large retrospective real-life database, older women with HER2+ MBC received standard first-line treatment less frequently than younger ones. This was independently associated with a worse outcome, but confounding factors and usual selection biases cannot be ruled out.
509 Background: With an incidence of 30%-40%, BM are common complications of HER2+ MBC. Their therapeutic management remains a challenge. As responses on central nervous system (CNS) localization have been reported with L+C combination after WBR, we sought to evaluate the clinical interest of this combination as 1st line treatment for BM in HER2+ MBC patients (pts) with the aim to avoid or to delay WBR. Methods: Eligible pts had HER2+ MBC with BM not previously treated with WBR, C or L. Pts received L1250 mg/day and C2000 mg/m2/day, days 1-14, every 21 days. The primary endpoint was a centrally assessed CNS objective response (CNS-OR) defined as a ≥50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesions in the absence of increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic symptoms, or progressive extra-CNS disease. Using a Simon's optimal two-stage design with a minimum interesting CNS-OR rate of 20%, 41 evaluable patients were needed. Secondary endpoints included: time to progression (TTP) for both CNS and extra CNS disease; time to WBR; prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and toxicity. Results: From 04 /2009 to 08/2010, 45 pts were enrolled. Median age was 56 (range 35 to 79), 37 pts had multiple metastatic sites, PS was 0 (17 pts), 1 (25 pts) or 2 (2 pts); 36 pts had two or more BM and 42 had previously received trastuzumab. 41 pts received at least 2 cycles of study treatment. 43 pts were evaluable for efficacy endpoints, with a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2.9-16.5). The CNS-OR rate was 67% (95%CI 51-81), with a median time from inclusion to response of 1.8 month. Median TTP was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9-5.9) and median time to WBR was 8.3 months (95% CI 5.1-11.7). At baseline, 21/42 pts had ≥ 1CTC, vs 7/39 at day 21, p<0.01 (correlation study ongoing). 20 patients (44%) experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment related toxicity, treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 3 pts. At the time of analysis, 21 pts had received WBR and 10 pts had died. Conclusions: With a high response rate, L + C is an active treatment option and a viable alternative to immediate WBR for HER2+ MBC pts with newly diagnosed BM.
<p>Goodness-of-fit plots. Predicted versus observed CA-125 concentrations are shown for the population (left panel) and for individuals (right panel). Black line: identity line.</p>
