Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogenous disorder with visceral hypersensitivity as important hallmark. It is not known whether IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity have different epidemiological and clinical characteristics compared with IBS patients without visceral hypersensitivity. Aim of our study was to compare in detail a large group of hyper- vs normosensitive IBS patients with respect to epidemiological and clinical characteristics.IBS patients (Rome III criteria) have been recruited for a large-scale cohort study. All patients from this cohort who underwent a rectal barostat procedure were included and allocated based on those with and without visceral hypersensitivity. Patient demographics, and symptoms were collected using questionnaires (GSRS, HADS, SF-36) and a 14-day symptom diary for IBS-related symptoms. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify risk markers for having visceral hypersensitivity.Ninety-five normosensitive and 93 hypersensitive IBS patients participated in this study. Hypersensitive patients had significantly higher scores for GSRS abdominal pain (p < 0.05), indigestion, reflux and constipation syndrome (all p < 0.01), and IBS symptom intensity, discomfort (both p < 0.05) and mean symptom composite score (p < 0.01). Age, female sex, and the use of SSRI medication were significantly different between the normo- and the hypersensitive IBS patients. However, after adjustment for other risk markers, only increasing age was found to be significantly associated with lower odds for having hypersensitivity (OR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94; 0.99]).Apart from more severe symptomatology, hypersensitive IBS patients are characterized by significantly younger age compared with normosensitive IBS patients. The study has been registered in the US National Library of Medicine (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00702026).
Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance reflects the conductivity of the esophageal mucosa and may be an instrument for in vivo evaluation of mucosal integrity in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is a well-established treatment option for children with proton pump inhibitory (PPI) therapy resistant GERD. The effect of LARS in children on baseline impedance has not been studied in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LARS on baseline impedance in children with GERD. This is a prospective, multicenter, nationwide cohort study (Dutch national trial registry: NTR2934) including 25 patients [12 males, median age 6 (range 2–18) years] with PPI-resistant GERD scheduled to undergo LARS. Twenty-four hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH monitoring) was performed before and 3 months after LARS. Baseline impedance was evaluated during consecutive 2-h intervals in the 24-h tracings. LARS reduced acid exposure time from 8.5 % (6.0–16.2 %) to 0.8 % (0.2–2.8 %), p < 0.001. Distal baseline impedance increased after LARS from 2445 Ω (1147–3277 Ω) to 3792 Ω (3087–4700 Ω), p < 0.001. Preoperative baseline impedance strongly correlated with acid exposure time (r −0.76, p < 0.001); however, no association between symptomatic outcome and baseline impedance was identified. LARS significantly increased baseline impedance likely reflecting recovery of mucosal integrity. As the change in baseline impedance was not associated with the clinical outcome of LARS, other factors besides mucosal integrity may contribute to symptom perception in children with GERD.
Achalasia is characterized by a functional esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction. The functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is a method to assess EGJ distensibility. In a homogeneous group of newly diagnosed achalasia patients treated with pneumatic dilation (PD), we aimed (i) to determine whether the assessment of EGJ distensibility has added value in the management of achalasia patients and (ii) to evaluate whether EGJ distensibility differs between achalasia subtypes.Twenty-six newly diagnosed achalasia patients were treated by graded PD (30 and 35 mm) separated by 1 week. EGJ distensibility was measured with the EndoFLIP technique before and after 30 mm PD. Good clinical outcome was defined as an Eckardt score <4 at 1-year follow-up. Fifteen healthy controls underwent an EndoFLIP measurement as control group.Newly diagnosed achalasia patients had reduced EGJ distensibility compared to healthy controls (0.9 [0.7-1.5] vs 3.4 [2.7-4.2] mm(2) /mmHg, p < 0.01), and EGJ distensibility was lower in type II compared to type I patients (0.8 [0.7-1.1] vs 1.5 [0.9-1.9] mm(2) /mmHg, p = 0.02). EGJ distensibility was increased after PD from 0.9 (0.7-1.5) to 4.2 (3.0-5.7) mm(2) /mmHg (p < 0.001). No difference was found in EGJ distensibility directly after PD between patients with good and poor clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up.Assessment of EGJ distensibility with the EndoFLIP technique is able to demonstrate the functional EGJ obstruction in newly diagnosed achalasia patients and EGJ distensibility differs between achalasia subtypes. Although PD improves EGJ distensibility, assessment of EGJ distensibility with a limited number of distension steps provides no additional information that is useful for clinical evaluation and management of achalasia patients.
128 patients operated on for hiatal hernia are reported. The follow-up study consisted of 102 patients, 16 with paraoesophageal and 86 with axial hiatal hernia. The mean follow-up time was 4 1/2 years, range 1-11 years. In our experience cineradiographic studies bring abnormalities to light more readily because this kind of study is repeatable compared with conventional techniques based on fluoroscopy. Four different methods of operation were used in this study. The recurrence rate was as follows: Nissen fundoplication 13%, both anterior 180 degrees fundoplication and Lortat-Jacobs procedure 38%, and Nissen fundoplication combined to vagotomy and pyloroplasty 54%. Postoperative complications occurred in 9%. There was no hospital mortality. The authors prefer the abdominal to the transthoracic approach because many patients had other intra-abdominal, surgically easily correctable condition. If the transthoracic operation is indicated, as in a very obese patient or in a patient with a secondary short oesophagus, intra-abdominal disease must have been excluded preoperatively. In the treatment of axial hiatal hernia the best operative method has not yet been agreed upon, but in our hands the Nissen fundoplication yielded the best results.
Colonic manometry (CM) can be of additive value in the diagnostic workup of colonic motility in chronic constipated patients. However, it is claimed that colonic motor disturbances occur in normal-transit constipation (NTC) and slow-transit (STC) constipation, as measured using a radio-opaque marker study, and therefore, the relationship between colonic motor disturbances on CM and colonic transit time (CTT) remains unclear. Our aim was to compare results from colonic marker study with the outcome of CM in patients with treatment-refractory chronic constipation (CC).Eighty-seven CC patients and 12 healthy volunteers, undergoing both a CTT study and a 24-h CM in a Dutch tertiary referral center, were included. CTT was measured using radio-opaque markers (X-ray at day 4 after ingestion of 20 markers at day 0). CM was performed using a catheter with 6 solid-state pressure sensors, endoscopically clipped to the mucosa in the right colon. CM was defined as normal when at least three high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), i.e., propagating waves with amplitude ≥ 80 mmHg over at least three sensors, were identified.In total, 70 patients showed STC on CTT, of which 21 (30%) showed normal CM. All 17 NTC patients and healthy volunteers showed normal CM. The negative predictive value of CTT for normal CM was 100%.Colonic manometry should be considered in therapy-refractory STC patients in order to further delineate colonic motility. However, in this exploratory study, for patients presenting with NTC on a radio-opaque marker study, colonic manometry does not appear to have added value.
Rumination syndrome is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized by regurgitation of recently ingested food. We aimed to improve the diagnosis of rumination syndrome by classification of separate rumination symptoms using (1) an ambulatory manometry/impedance (AMIM) measurement and (2) a single-catheter high-resolution manometry/impedance (HRIM) measurement.A total of 96 symptoms during AMIM and 37 symptoms during HRIM were analyzed in five patients with clinically diagnosed rumination syndrome.AMIM identified rumination events in 85 out of 96 reported symptoms (symptom index (SI): 89%). Of these events, 63% were non-acidic and would have been missed by pH-metry. HRIM identified 32 out of 37 reported symptoms (SI: 86%). Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation was observed during all rumination events identified by HRIM and could be an additional criterion in the definition of rumination events.Impedance measurement and high-resolution manometry contribute to a more detailed description of rumination events. Rumination events defined as gastric strain, common cavity phenomenon, retrograde esophageal fluid flow, and UES relaxation show a high SI when measured with AMIM or single-catheter HRIM.
