An individual with late-onset ataxia was found to be heterozygous for an unusual (GAAGGA)65 sequence and a normal GAA repeat in the frataxin gene. No frataxin point mutation was present, excluding a form of Friedreich ataxia. (GAAGGA)65 did not have the inhibitory effect on gene expression in transfected cells shown by pathogenic GAA repeats of similar length. GAA repeats, but not (GAAGGA)65, adopt a triple helical conformation in vitro. We suggest that such a triplex structure is essential for suppression of gene expression.
Many reports demonstrate that a high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) is closely associated with good prognosis of cancer. However, specific studies investigating the association of various TMB statuses with overall survival in patients with solid tumors are scarce.In the present study, we investigated the association of TMB status with overall survival in 5,072 patients with cancer from the HOPE project and clarified the specific mechanism responsible for the good prognosis of the TMB-H group. All tumors were classified into one of four groups based on TMB: ultralow (UL), low (L), intermediate (I) and high (H).The TMB-H group had a better prognosis than the TMB-I and TMB-L groups, but not than the TMB-UL group. Analyzing the expression of 293 immune response-associated genes, 17 genes were up-regulated in the TMB-H group compared to the TMB-I and TNB-L groups, and two genes [CD274 and interferon-γ (IFNG)] were identified as good prognostic factors. Analysis of immune cell populations inside tumors demonstrated that the frequencies of exhausted CD8+ T-cells, activated effector CD8+ T-cells and natural killer cells were significantly higher in the TMB-H group. The T-cell receptor repertoire numbers and the diversity evenness score (DE50) were lower in the TMB-H group than in TMB-UL group; however, no association of the DE50 value with the binding or elution affinity of epitope peptides from neoantigens was found.One possible mechanism for the good prognosis of the TMB-UL group compared to the TMB-H group might be that the TMB-UL group features a balance between immunosuppression and immunostimulation.
Abstract Background Small intestine carcinoma (SIC) cases in Japan have recently been treated with chemotherapy according to colorectal carcinoma classification, while papilla of Vater carcinoma (PVC) cases according to cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) classification. However, few research reports support the molecular genetic validity of these therapeutic choices. Patients and methods Here, we investigated the clinicopathological and molecular genetic factors of SIC and PVC. We used the data from the Japanese version of The Cancer Genome Atlas. Additionally, molecular genetic data on gastric adenocarcinoma (GAD), colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAD), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and CHC were also referred to. Results This study consisted of tumor samples from 12 patients of SIC and three patients of PVC treated from January 2014 to March 2019. Among them, six patients had pancreatic invasion. t ‐Distributed stochastic neighbor embedding analysis showed that the gene expression pattern of SIC was similar not only to those of GAD and CRAD, but also to that of PDAC in the pancreatic invasion patients. In addition, PVC resembled the GAD, CRAD, and PDAC, rather than the CHC. The molecular genetic characteristics of the six patients with pancreatic invasion were: one had high microsatellite instability, two had a TP53 driver mutation, and three had tumor mutation burden values <1 mutation/Mb with no driver mutation. Conclusions In this study, the extensive gene expression profiling of organ carcinomas newly suggests that SIC or PVC may resemble GAD, CRAD, and PDAC. In addition, the data demonstrate that pancreatic invasive patients may be classified into several subtypes using molecular genetic factors.
Abstract Tumor mutational burden analysis using whole‐exome sequencing highlights features of tumors with various mutations or known driver alterations. Cancers with few changes in the exon regions have unclear characteristics, even though low‐mutated tumors are often detected in pan‐cancer analysis. In the present study, we analyzed tumors with low tumor mutational burden listed in the Japanese version of The Cancer Genome Atlas, a data set of 5020 primary solid tumors. Our analysis revealed that detection rates of known driver mutations and copy number variation were decreased in samples with tumor mutational burden below 1.0 (ultralow tumor), compared with those in samples with low tumor mutational burden (≤5 mutations/Mb). This trend was also observed in The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. In the ultralow tumor mutational burden tumors, expression analysis showed decreased TP53 inactivation and chromosomal instability. TP53 inactivation frequently correlated with PI3K/mTOR‐related gene expression, implying suppression of the PI3K/mTOR pathway in ultralow tumor mutational burden tumors. In common with mutational burden, the T cell‐inflamed gene expression profiling signature was a potential marker for prediction of an immune checkpoint inhibitor response, and some ultralow tumor mutational burden tumor populations highly expressed this signature. Our analysis focused on how these tumors could provide insight into tumors with low somatic alteration that are difficult to detect solely using whole‐exome sequencing.
