The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have set standards in reporting outcomes after oesophagectomy. Reporting outcomes from selected high-volume centres or centralized national cancer programmes may not, however, be reflective of the true global prevalence of complications. This study aimed to compare complication rates after oesophagectomy from these existing sources with those of an unselected international cohort from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).The OGAA was a prospective multicentre cohort study coordinated by the West Midlands Research Collaborative, and included patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April and December 2018, with 90 days of follow-up.The OGAA study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. Comparisons with the ECCG and DUCA found differences in baseline demographics between the three cohorts, including age, ASA grade, and rates of chronic pulmonary disease. The OGAA had the lowest rates of neoadjuvant treatment (OGAA 75.1 per cent, ECCG 78.9 per cent, DUCA 93.5 per cent; P < 0.001). DUCA exhibited the highest rates of minimally invasive surgery (OGAA 57.2 per cent, ECCG 47.9 per cent, DUCA 85.8 per cent; P < 0.001). Overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts (OGAA 63.6 per cent, ECCG 59.0 per cent, DUCA 62.2 per cent), with no statistically significant difference in Clavien-Dindo grades (P = 0.752). However, a significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed, with DUCA reporting the lowest rate (OGAA 3.2 per cent, ECCG 2.4 per cent, DUCA 1.7 per cent; P = 0.013).Despite differences in rates of co-morbidities, oncological treatment strategies, and access to minimal-access surgery, overall complication rates were similar in the three cohorts.
Laparoscopic surgery in patients with Fontan circulation is a haemodynamic challenge; venous return may be compromised by insufflation of carbon dioxide into the abdomen (increasing intra-abdominal pressure), the use of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation. Combined with an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance due to hypercarbia, cardiac output may be reduced. However, for non-haemodynamic reasons, laparoscopic surgery has advantages over open surgery: less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, a reduction in postoperative wound infections and a reduction of respiratory complications. In this case report, we present a patient with Fontan circulation who underwent uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
In this case report, a patient with cardiac arrest due to obstructive shock is described. The obstructive shock was due to a paraoesophageal gastric re-herniation as a late complication of laparoscopic repair of symptomatic diaphragmatic herniation of the stomach.
Aims Minimally invasive esophagectomy with two-field thoracolaparoscopic lymphadenectomy is the current standard of care for high-risk T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, since the tumor can often be removed completely with endoscopic resection, and lymph node involvement only concerns the minority of patients, the majority of patients receive overtreatment. Sentinel node navigation surgery is a well-known concept to tailor the extent of lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of sentinel node navigation surgery with a hybrid tracer (technetium-99m/indocyanine green/nanocolloid) for patients with high-risk T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
