Experimental testing and finite element analysis of model heterogeneous materials consisting of regular periodic arrays of circular voids within metallic or polymeric matrices reveals that the materials exhibit mechanical behaviour consistent with the predictions of micropolar or Cosserat elasticity theory: for samples of similar geometry sample stiffness increases as size reduces. However, this behaviour is only observed in cases where the sample surface remains smooth and continuous, the circular voids constituting the heterogeneity do not intersect the surface. In this paper the results of finite element analyses of model heterogeneous materials in which the surfaces are corrugated because the voids intersect them are presented. The results indicate that rather than exhibiting micropolar behaviour in which sample stiffness increases with reducing size the opposite is observed; the samples become more compliant as size decreases. Interestingly, the rate of decrease in the latter case where the voids intersect the surface is exactly equal to the rate of increase in the former case where the surfaces are smooth. Mechanical testing of a real material, bovine cortical bone, reveals a stiffness variation consistent with that of a heterogeneous material with corrugated surfaces, the smaller bone samples are more compliant than their larger counterparts. The observed rate of change of stiffness is then used to determine the value of an additional elastic constant present within micropolar elasticity theory, the characteristic length. The value obtained for this parameter is shown to be consistent with the length scales associated with the largest scale heterogeneity present within the bone, the Herversian canal system.
Decellularised porcine superflexor tendon (pSFT) has been characterised as a suitable scaffold for anterior cruciate ligament replacement, with dimensions similar to hamstring tendon autograft. However, decellularisation of tissues may reduce or damage extracellular matrix components, leading to undesirable biomechanical changes at a whole tissue scale. Although the role of collagen in tendons is well established, the mechanical contribution of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) is less evident and could be altered by the decellularisation process. In this study, the contribution of GAGs to the tensile and compressive mechanical properties of pSFT was determined and whether decellularisation affected these properties by reducing GAG content or functionality.PSFTs were either enzymatically treated using chondroitinase ABC to remove GAGs or decellularised using previously established methods. Native, GAG-depleted and decellularised pSFT groups were then subjected to quantitative assays and biomechanical characterisation. In tension, specimens underwent stress relaxation and strength testing. In compression, specimens underwent confined compression testing.The GAG-depleted group was found to have a significantly lower GAG content than native and decellularised groups. There was no significant difference in GAG content between native and decellularised groups. Although stress relaxation testing discovered a reduction in the time-independent relaxation modulus in the decellularised group, there were no other significant differences between any of the groups for any of the remaining parameters assessed with stress relaxation or strength testing in tension. In compression testing, the aggregate modulus was found to be significantly lower in the GAG-depleted group than the native and decellularised groups, while the permeability was significantly higher in the GAG-depleted group than the decellularised group.The results indicate that GAGs significantly contribute to the mechanical properties of pSFT in compression, but not in tension. Furthermore, the content and function of GAGs in pSFTs are unaffected by decellularisation and the mechanical properties of the tissue are retained.
Clinical laxity tests are frequently used for assessing knee ligament injuries and for soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Current routine methods are highly subjective with respect to examination technique, magnitude of clinician-applied load and assessment of joint displacement. Alignment measurements generated by computer-assisted technology have led to the development of quantitative TKA soft tissue balancing algorithms. However to make the algorithms applicable in practice requires the standardisation of several parameters: knee flexion angle should be maintained to minimise the potential positional variation in ligament restraining properties; hand positioning of the examining clinician should correspond to a measured lever arm, defined as the perpendicular distance of the applied force from the rotational knee centre; accurate measurement of force applied is required to calculate the moment applied to the knee joint; resultant displacement of the knee should be quantified. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether different clinicians could reliably assess coronal knee laxity with a standardised protocol that controlled these variables. Furthermore, a secondary question was to examine if the experience of the clinician makes a difference. We hypothesised that standardisation would result in a narrow range of laxity measurements obtained by different clinicians. Six consultant orthopaedic surgeons, six orthopaedic trainees and six physiotherapists were instructed to assess the coronal laxity of the right knee of a healthy volunteer. Points were marked over the femoral epicondyles and the malleoli to indicate hand positioning and give a constant moment arm. The non-invasive adaptation of a commercially available image-free navigation system enabled real-time measurement of coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles. This has been previously validated to an accuracy of ±1°. Collateral knee laxity was defined as the amount of angular displacement during a stress manoeuvre. Participants were instructed to maintain the knee joint in 2° of flexion whilst performing a varus-valgus stress test using what they perceived as an acceptable load. They were blinded to the coronal MFT angle measurements. A hand-held force application device (FAD) was then employed to allow the clinicians to apply a moment of 18Nm. This level was based on previous work to determine a suitable subject tolerance limit. They were instructed to repeat the test using the device in the palm of their right hand and to apply the force until the visual display and an auditory alarm indicated that the target had been reached. The FAD was then removed and participants were asked to repeat the clinical varus-valgus stress test, but to try and apply the same amount of force as they had been doing with the device. Maximum MFT angular deviation was automatically recorded for each stress test and the maximum moment applied was recorded for each of the tests using the FAD. Means and standard deviations (SD) were used to compare different clinicians under the same conditions. Paired t-tests were used to measure the change in practice of groups of clinicians before, during and after use of the FAD for both varus and valgus stress tests. All three groups of clinicians initially produced measurements of valgus laxity with consistent mean values (1.5° for physiotherapists, 1.8° for consultants and 1.6° for trainees) and standard deviations ( We have successfully standardised the manual technique of coronal knee laxity assessment by controlling the subjective variables. The results support the hypothesis of producing a narrow range of laxity measurements but with valgus laxity appearing more consistent than varus. The incorporation of a FAD into assessment of coronal knee laxity did not affect the clinicians9 ability to produce reliable and repeatable measurements, despite removing the manual perception of laxity. The FAD also provided additional information about the actual moment applied. This information may have a role in improving the balancing techniques of TKA and the management of collateral ligament injuries with regard initial diagnosis and grading as well as rehabilitation. Finally, the results suggest that following use of the FAD, more experienced clinicians returned to applying their usual manual force, while trainees appeared to use this augmented feedback to adapt their technique. Therefore this technique could be a way to harness the experience of senior clinicians and use it to enhance the perceptive skills of more junior trainees who do not have the benefit of this knowledge.
Knee alignment is a fundamental measurement in the assessment, monitoring and surgical management of patients with OA. In spite of extensive research into the consequences of malalignment, there is a lack of data regarding the potential variation between supine and standing (functional) conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore this relationship in asymptomatic, osteoarthritic and prosthetic knees. Our hypothesis was that the change in alignment of these three groups would be different. Infrared position capture was used to assess knee alignment for 30 asymptomatic controls and 31 patients with OA, before and after TKA. Coronal and sagittal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) angles in extension (negative values varus/hyperextension) were measured supine and in bi-pedal stance and changes analysed using a paired t-test. To quantify this change in 3D, vector plots of ankle centre displacement relative to the knee centre were produced. Alignment in both planes changed significantly from supine to standing for all three groups, most frequently towards relative varus and extension. In the coronal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was 0.1±2.5/−1.1±3.7 for asymptomatic (p=0.001), −2.5±5.7/−3.6±6.0 for osteoarthritic (p=0.009) and −0.7±1.4/ −2.5±2.0 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). In the sagittal plane, the mean±SD(°) of the supine/standing MFT angles was −1.7±3.3/−5.5±4.9 for asymptomatic (p<0.001), 7.7±7.1/1.8±7.7 for osteoarthritic (p<0.001) and 6.8±5.1/1.4±7.6 for prosthetic knees (p<0.001). The vector plots showed that the trend of relative varus and extension in stance was similar in overall magnitude and direction between the groups. The similarities between each group did not support our hypothesis. The consistent kinematic pattern for different knee types suggests that soft tissue restraints rather than underlying joint deformity may be more influential in dynamic control of alignment from lying to standing. This potential change should be considered when positioning TKA components on supine limbs as post-operative functional alignment may be different.